Exhibit no part of case remains in this court — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 97-3)

Summary

Appellant's Ex-Party Notice to the Court on the Defendant's Default, captioned for the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Natasha Marie Athens, d/b/a Favorite Things v. Bank of America; Megan Scholz, and filed February 5, 2022 as Document 97-3 in district court Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM. It asserts that the defendants defaulted, that no part of the case remains in the district court, and that the judge's order after default is moot. The notice quotes Rule 55 on entering a default and states that the appellant has a default ruling due for $5 Million dollars and a second for $25 Million dollars. It is signed /s/ Natasha Athens.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 97-3 Filed 02/05/22 Page 1 of 2




                       United States Court of Appeals
                            For the First Circuit
                    No. 22-1964, 1965, 1004,1083,1084
                NATASHA MARIE ATHENS, d/b/a Favorite Things,
                            Plaintiff - Appellant,
                                       v.
                    BANK OF AMERICA; MEGAN SCHOLZ,
                          Defendants - Appellees.


APPELLANT'S EX-PARTY NOTICE to the Court On The Defendant's Default
This case in all of its parts has been defaulted on. No part of the case remains in
District court.
When a party defaults on any part of a case, the entire case is defaulted.
There is not any allowance for any judge in the lower court to write an illicit order
(it's moot) after default and obstruct justice by trying to pull back the case, and
continue to write orders.
It's unconscionable and not lawful.
Rule 55. Default; Default Judgment
(a) Entering a Default. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative
relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown
by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default.
The Defendant DEFAULTED in lower court and continued to file pleadings that
were not allowed, the Appellant sought a lawful strike on those pleadings, after
court shennigans by the judge were so bias and such an obstruction.
An ANTIDOTE to default is NOT to then try to deny a lawful party her right to file a
valid claim. The case should have always been settled and the defaulted parties
refused.
        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 97-3 Filed 02/05/22 Page 2 of 2




A JUDGE has not option to obstruct justice further, while he's already being
investigated by the Chief Judge, and then attempt to bring the appealed and
WON case back to his court.
It's unheard of and should have the Judge removed permantently for this order.
The Appellant as WON this case as a matter of law and the Appellee's Failure to
file for an appearance during 7 months of a case, multiple appeals, and a 2nd case
against him personally for stealing taxes and publishing them.
It's gone past the point of insanity, and yet, the Plaintiff still has a 100% forgivable
loan, she has a default ruling due for $5 Million dollars, and a 2nd one for $25
Million dollars for Not ever serving even returned envelopes of trying to serve his
pleadings 1st class mail and harass the Appellant, he simply did nothing,
NO ONE can allow this Appellee, nor any party to bypass the rules for elecronic
filing.
The Judge's order is MOOT and is not even something that can be considered, but
it does display his own obstruction and bias, and targeting a lawful Plaintiff that
has a Constiutional right to appear in court and sue for injustice. He does not own
the legal system


/s/ Natasha Athens
Filed on February 5, 2022 in response to an order while there is no case before
the Federal District Court.
Ex-Party


File and source

File

97-att3-exhibit-no-part-of-case-remains-in-this-court.pdf

Size

792,956 bytes

SHA-256

9d2f279f54c66cc7ff8960966b8e35d57e5a2354553a901eb55fdc15743dd768

Our copy

97-att3-exhibit-no-part-of-case-remains-in-this-court.pdf

Original

archive.org