Exhibit D (Camelot Banquet Rooms) — DV Diamond Club (E.D. Mich.)

Summary

Exhibit D in DV Diamond Club of Flint, LLC v. U.S. Small Business Administration (E.D. Mich.), Case No. 4:20-cv-10899, filed April 17, 2020 as ECF No. 12-5. It reproduces the Court Minutes of Conference from Camelot Banquet Rooms, Inc. v. United States Small Business Administration, Case No. 20-CV-601, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, for a telephonic status conference on April 15, 2020 before Judge Lynn Adelman. The minutes record an oral ruling granting the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and direct the defendants to refrain from enforcing 13 CFR § 120.110(p) and SBA SOP 50 10 5(k), Ch. 2(III)(A)(15) as to those plaintiffs. The defendants must restore the plaintiffs to their place in the application queue, the restraints expire in 14 days unless extended, and no security is required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c).

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Case 4:20-cv-10899-MFL-DRG ECF No. 12-5 filed 04/17/20              PageID.553     Page 1 of 2




                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

 CAMELOT BANQUET ROOMS, INC.,
 DOWNTOWN JUNEAU INVESTMENTS, LLC,
 MIDRAD, LLC, and
 PPH PROPRTIES I, LLC,
                  Plaintiffs,

          v.                                               Case No. 20-CV-601

 UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS
 ADMINISTRATION; JOVITA CARRANZA,
 in her Official Capacity as Administrator of
 the Small Business Administration;
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and
 STEVEN MNUCHIN, in his Official Capacity
 as United States Secretary of Treasury,
                     Defendants.


                             COURT MINUTES OF CONFERENCE

 Judge Lynn Adelman, presiding                     Date: 4/15/20
 Time Commenced: 3:17 p.m.                         Concluded: 4:00 p.m.
 Deputy Clerk: TR                                  Court Reporter: Susan Armbruster

 APPEARANCES:

 Plaintiff:       Jeff Scott Olson
 Defendant:       Emily Constantine, Carter Stewart, and Jim Gilligan
 Nature of Conference: Telephonic Status Conference
 Notes:
     •    The parties discussed the pending motion for a TRO. The Court, finding that
          Plaintiffs demonstrated irreparable harm absent preliminary injunctive relief,
          inadequate existing remedies at law, and Plaintiffs having a reasonable likelihood
          of success on the merits, and, determining that the balance of the potential harm
          to the Plaintiffs outweighs the harm to other parties or the public interest, issued
          an oral ruling GRANTING the Plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order
          (ECF No. 8). Defendants and their agents are ORDERED to:
              o (1) Refrain from enforcing 13 CFR § 120.110(p) and SBA SOP 50 10 5(k),
                  Ch. 2(III)(A)(15) as to the plaintiffs in this action; and


                                                                                        EXHIBIT D
                                                                                            Page 1
               Case 2:20-cv-00601-LA Filed 04/15/20 Page 1 of 2 Document 13
Case 4:20-cv-10899-MFL-DRG ECF No. 12-5 filed 04/17/20            PageID.554     Page 2 of 2



           o (2) Restore Plaintiffs to their place in the application queue as if their
               applications submitted April 3 have not been denied.
    •   The restraints contained in the Court’s order expire 14 days from the date of the
        order unless the Court, for good cause, extends them for a like period or
        Defendants consent to a longer extension.
    •   The Court also determined that Plaintiffs were not required to file a security under
        Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c), as such security is unnecessary given the nature of this
        case. The Court also GRANTED Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file excess pages
        ECF No. 11).
    •   The Court and parties set out deadlines for response and reply briefs (and
        supporting materials) for the motion for preliminary injunction. See scheduling
        order.
    •   See transcript for further details.




                                                                                      EXHIBIT D
                                                                                          Page 2
          Case 2:20-cv-00601-LA Filed 04/15/20 Page 2 of 2 Document 13


File and source

File

12-att5-exhibit-d-order-granting-tro-in-sister-case-camelot-banquet.pdf

Size

744,610 bytes

SHA-256

20ae897598a2f497fc3fc015b8cc08a6d6e946ce2a7d5de36800e8a153a1626f

Our copy

12-att5-exhibit-d-order-granting-tro-in-sister-case-camelot-banquet.pdf

Original

archive.org