Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Exhibit B — DV Diamond Club v. SBA (Dkt. 32-2, E.D. Mich.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Exhibit B — DV Diamond Club v. SBA (Dkt. 32-2, E.D. Mich.)

Summary

Exhibit B in DV Diamond Club of Flint, LLC v. U.S. Small Business Administration (E.D. Mich.), Case No. 4:20-cv-10899, filed April 29, 2020 as ECF No. 32-2. It is an April 29, 2020 letter from the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division, to Bradley J. Shafer and Matthew J. Hoffer, responding to the plaintiffs' April 23, 2020 notice of deposition. It sets out some of the grounds on which the SBA objects to the noticed topics and states that many of them are irrelevant and overly broad. It objects to Topic 1, on the meaning of "prurient sexual nature," as overly broad and as calling for a legal conclusion, calls the administration topics irrelevant to the facial challenge to 13 C.F.R. § 120.110(p), and states that SBA, not a lender, makes the final decision on eligibility. The signature block names Indraneel Sur, Trial Attorney.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 727 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name32-att2-exhibit-b-sba-objections-to-notice-of-30b6-deposition.pdf
SHA-256722aaf996320440262824dd829c973f9ac7c23ff11991bdf7a60d2aee9e90bff
Size744,216 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
32-att2-exhibit-b-sba-objections-to-notice-of-30b6-deposition.pdf
Size
744,216 bytes
SHA-256
722aaf996320440262824dd829c973f9ac7c23ff11991bdf7a60d2aee9e90bff
Our copy
32-att2-exhibit-b-sba-objections-to-notice-of-30b6-deposition.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top