Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Affidavit — Athens v. Bank of America (Dkt. 83-1, D.N.H.)Search ⌕

Affidavit — Athens v. Bank of America (Dkt. 83-1, D.N.H.)

Summary

An affidavit by plaintiff Natasha Athens, d/b/a Favorite Things, filed January 25, 2022 as Document 83-1 in Athens v. Bank of America, N.A. and Megan Scholz, Case No. 21-cv-748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. Athens swears that the PPP loan obtained at Bank of America was lawful and based on the payroll of a new business. The affidavit reproduces a Bank of America email dated 5/12/2020 about escalating the loan calculation for a new loan amount of $18625, and a notice that the loan was put through to forgiveness in full on 7/30 2021. It asserts that defendant Megan Scholz pulled the loan out of forgiveness, objects to the use of tax records it calls stolen, and cites 26 U.S. Code § 7213. The three-page affidavit is signed /s/ Natasha Athens.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Affidavit — Athens v. Bank of America (Dkt. 83-1, D.N.H.).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/exhibit-affidavit-no-1-21-cv-00748-dkt-83-1-1e5146492a/, SHA-256 0324ec11dd13ef540cd10c73baaab614c0bf6689cc57423316d9f6cef47cb987.

Full text

          Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 83-1 Filed 01/25/22 Page 1 of 3




                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

                                 Natasha Athens,

                              d/b/a Favorite Things,

                                     Plaintiff

                            v. Case No. 21-cv-748-SM

                            Bank of America, N.A. and

                                  Megan Scholz,

                                    Defendant

AFFIDAVIT
I swear under the penalties of perjury that I obtained a lawful PPP loan at Bank of
America based on my payroll with my new business.
Zahid, Naushaba <naushaba.zahid@bofa.com>
Tue 5/12/2020 4:25 PM
To: You
Good afternoon Ms. Athens,
It was a pleasure to speak with you today and to discuss your escalation for the
PPP calculations.
I just wanted to let you know I have advanced your escalation to our SBA team
to work on getting you a new loan amount of $18625 based on your 2020 941
for 1st qtr and the 2019 Schedule C based on one month of business.
Thank you for being a valued Bank of America client
Naushaba Zahid,
Vice President | Preferred and Small Business Banking
        Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 83-1 Filed 01/25/22 Page 2 of 3




Bank of America | Baltimore Area
344 Montrose Ave Laurel MD 20707
Priority Service Line: 1-888-287-4637
This email was bank of America VP Naushaba Zahid after a couple of phone calls
and email messages. She went over my PAYROLL and calcuated those payroll
numbers according to my payroll deposits.
The Forgiveness loan was in forgiveness for the full amount, as the law required,
and it was pulled out by Megan Sholz illegally.
7/30 2021 this LOAN was put through to forgiveness in full
Bank of America has submitted a decision on your Paycheck Protection Program
loan forgiveness application to the Small Business Administration
I was entitled to both the loan and forgiveness based on my payroll.
Stolen tax records were unlawfully cherry picked and put in as evidence that have
had to be sealed. There were 3 different applications filled out for PPP loans in
the 2 different tiers.
I have never committed a crime, nor taken anything that was not allotted to me,
and if I have ever made any errors in life, pleadings, taxes, business, divorce, etc, I
have owned up to them and corrected them.
The court is not privy to my taxes, nor can require answers to them, or to what I
filed. That is why 26 U.S. Code § 7213 - Unauthorized disclosure of information is
a federal law with a felony of publishing stolen records.
This court does not get to order anything other than the fact that I was legally
given a PPP loan based on what I provided. And it was in forgiveness.
Megan Scholz caught herself in a trap because she committed the crime of pulling
it out of forgiveness.
I did not obtain this loan illegally by any means.
I did not misspend the funds, and when they were illegally inside my bank
account, they could see that the funds were used in accordance with the PPP
       Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 83-1 Filed 01/25/22 Page 3 of 3




regulations and that my forgiveness application was made way in advance of
when Bank of America offered forgiveness.
The Judge is not allowed to seek data on stolen taxes, that are were pulled from
different applications, and then attempted to cover for a crime.
The judge is not allowed to COVER for those crimes and try to seek information to
which he is not entitled.
The bank was not allowed to let Megan Scholz even have different records from
an already approved loan. Thus they were sealed.
/s/ Natasha Athens
January 25, 2022

File and source

File
83-att1-exhibit-affidavit.pdf
Size
1,550,338 bytes
SHA-256
0324ec11dd13ef540cd10c73baaab614c0bf6689cc57423316d9f6cef47cb987
Our copy
83-att1-exhibit-affidavit.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top