Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Preliminary injunction order — State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of Education (Doc. 2)

Preliminary injunction order — State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of Education (Doc. 2)

Summary

A preliminary injunction order, signed by the district judge, in State of New York, et al. v. U.S. Department of Education, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-02990 (ER)(BCM), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 3, 2025. The order enjoins defendants from enforcing or implementing the directives in the March 28, 2025 letter from Education Secretary Linda McMahon and in the "Dear Colleague" letter from Hayley B. Sanon, which purported to terminate liquidation periods under the Education Stabilization Fund. It requires at least thirty (30) days' notice before any modification of approved periods and directs defendants to process liquidation requests. It also requires plaintiffs to post security of $1,000.00.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Preliminary injunction order — State of New York et al. v. U.S. Department of Education (Doc. 2).” Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/document-state-of-new-york-et-al-v-u-s-department-of-education-no-25-1-d11f125518/, SHA-256 6cdeb143a9e24c5093b7a4029ceb0a54e6c8814f683bbbc5e5ad6c1c0cb73913.

Full text

       Case 1=25%a£82336181?<4= 08/88449 %E"Wé3'36@351 off;age 1 of 3




                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                    FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK


 STATE OF NEW YORK, et al.,

                             Plaintiffs,

        v.
                                                      Case No. 1:25-cv-02990 (ER)(BCM)
 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et
 al.,

                             Defendants .



                   [PROPOSED} PRELIMINARY INJUNCTON ORDER


       The Court, upon reviewing the parties' filings, including (i) Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. No.

1), (ii) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Immediate Injunctive Relief,

dated May 14, 2025 (Doc. Nos. 84-85), (iii) the declaration in support of Plaintiffs' motion (Doc.

No. 89), (iv) Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Immediate

Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 100), (v) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of

Motion for Immediate Injunctive Relief (Doc. No. 102), all papers submitted on Plaintiffs' April

II, 2025, motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. Nos. 10-28, 63, 67-69), and all other papers

and orders herein, and having heard all counsel, it is hereby ordered as follows:

       ORDERED that, sufficient reason having been shown therefor:

       1.      The Defendants are preliminarily enjoined from enforcing or implementing as

against Plaintiffs during the pendency of this litigation or until further order of the Court the

directives in the March 28, 2025, letter from Education Secretary Linda McMahon to State

Education Chiefs, Doc. No. 1-1 ("March 28 Letter"), which purported to terminate the periods of



                                                 1
        Case 1=25%a£82336181?<4= 08/88449 %E"%3-68838 ofForage 2 of 3




time for Plaintiffs to liquidate their obligations under the Education Stabilization Fund ("ESF"),

as that term is defined in the March 28 Letter, as of 5:00pm ET on March 28, 2025 .

        2.      The Defendants are preliminarily enjoined from enforcing or implementing as

against Plaintiffs during the pendency of this litigation or until further order of the Court the

directives in the May II, 2025, "Dear Colleague" letter from Hayley B. Sanon, Doc. No. 84-1

("May 11 Letter"), which purported to terminate the periods of time for Plaintiffs to liquidate their

obligations under the ESF, as that term is defined in the May 11 Letter, as of May 24, 2025 .

       3.       Defendants are preliminarily enjoined from attempting to modify ED's previously

approved periods for Plaintiffs to liquidate their obligations under the ESF without providing

notice to Plaintiffs at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such modification in order

to provide Plaintiffs sufficient time to review the bases for the attempted modification and seek

appropriate relief, as necessary, from the Court.

        4.      The Defendants are hereby directed to process Plaintiffs' outstanding and future

requests for liquidation of ESF without delay, and within one month from the issuance of this

Order shall file with the Court a status report listing for each Plaintiff the payment requests for

liquidation of ESF that are then outstanding, including the amount of each request, the date each

request was submitted, and the anticipated date by which each request will be processed.

       5.       The Defendants must provide written notice of this Order to all personnel within

the U.S. Department of Education. The written notice shall instruct all personnel that they must

comply with the provisions of this Order. Defendants shall confirm in the status report filed in

accordance with paragraph 2 of this Order that all personnel within the U.S. Department of

Education have received this notice.




                                                    2
       Case 1=25%a£823361é1?<4= 08/8é'44'3n5t= %E"%8~6a?@E§ ofF;age 3 of 3




       6.     In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. R 65(c), P1ainti8s are ordered to post security in

the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) within one week from the date of this order.




                                                   By the Court:


Dated: June 3, 2025
       New York, New York
                                                   Edgardo Ram
                                                                         ll-_
                                                                    U.S.D.J.




                                              3


File and source

File
2-district-court-preliminary-injunction-order-dated-06-03-2025.pdf
Size
789,626 bytes
SHA-256
6cdeb143a9e24c5093b7a4029ceb0a54e6c8814f683bbbc5e5ad6c1c0cb73913
Our copy
2-district-court-preliminary-injunction-order-dated-06-03-2025.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top