Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Detention Order — United States v. Cecilia Navil Aquino, No. 1:21-cr-00144 (Dkt. 8, E.D. Cal.)

Detention Order — United States v. Cecilia Navil Aquino, No. 1:21-cr-00144 (Dkt. 8, E.D. Cal.)

Summary

A detention order in United States v. Cecilia Navil Aquino, No. 1:21-cr-00144, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, signed June 2, 2021 by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto after a detention hearing under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). The court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure Aquino's appearance, and by clear and convincing evidence that none will reasonably assure the safety of any other person and the community. The charged crimes are mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, which the order calls a serious crime carrying a maximum penalty of 20 years/$250,000, and it finds the weight of the evidence high. Aquino is committed to the custody of the Attorney General, with reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                                    EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                    No. 1:21-cr-00144 NONE SKO

                           Plaintiff,

         v.                                                   DETENTION ORDER

 CECILIA NAVIL AQUINO,

                        Defendant.

A. Order For Detention
   After conducting a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) of the Bail Reform Act, the Court orders the
   above-named defendant detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and (i).

B. Statement Of Reasons For The Detention
   The Court orders the defendant’s detention because it finds:
    X By a preponderance of the evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably
         assure the appearance of the defendant as required.
   X     By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably
         assure the safety of any other person and the community.

C. Findings of Fact
   The Court’s findings are based on the evidence which was presented in Court and that which was contained in the
   Pretrial Services Report, and includes the following:
    X     (1) Nature and Circumstances of the offense charged:
            X (a) The crime, 18 U.S.C. § 1341 - Mail Fraud and 18 U.S.C. § 1343 - Wire Fraud, is a serious crime
                 and carries a maximum penalty of 20 years/$250,000
                 (b) The offense is a crime of violence.
                 (c) The offense involves a narcotic drug.
                 (d) The offense involves a large amount of controlled substances.
          (2) The weight of the evidence against the defendant is high.
          (3) The history and characteristics of the defendant including:
                 (a) General Factors:
                      unk        The defendant appears to have a mental condition which may affect whether the
                                 defendant will appear.
                      unk        The defendant has no known family ties in the area.
                      unk        The defendant has no known steady employment.
                      unk        The defendant has no known substantial financial resources.
                      unk        The defendant is not a long time resident of the community.
                      unk        The defendant does not have any known significant community ties.
                                 Past conduct of the defendant :
                      unk        The defendant has a history relating to drug abuse.
                      unk        The defendant has a significant prior criminal record.
                                 The defendant has a prior record of failure to appear at court proceedings.
 Defendant: CECILIA NAVIL AQUINO                                                                          Page 2 or 2
 Case Number: 1:21-cr-00144 NONE SKO

              (b) Whether the defendant was on probation, parole, or release by a court;

                       At the time of the current arrest, the defendant was on:
                              Probation
                         X Parole
                              Release pending trial, sentence, appeal or completion of sentence.
             (c) Other Factors:
                              The defendant is an illegal alien and is subject to deportation.
                              The defendant is a legal alien and will be subject to deportation if convicted.
                              Other:
         (4) The nature and seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant’s release are as follows:
         (5) Rebuttable Presumptions
             In determining that the defendant should be detained, the court also relied on the following
             rebuttable presumption(s) contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e), which the court finds the
             defendant has not rebutted:
                   a.         The crime charged is one described in § 3142(f)(1).
                              (A) a crime of violence; or
                              (B) an offense for which the maximum penalty is life imprisonment or death; or
                              (C) a controlled substance violation that has a maximum penalty of ten years or
                              more; or
                              (D) A felony after the defendant had been convicted of two or more prior offenses
                              described in (A) through (C) above, and the defendant has a prior conviction of one of
                              the crimes mentioned in (A) through (C) above which is less than five years old and
                              which was committed while the defendant was on pretrial release
                   b. There is probable cause to believe that defendant committed an offense for which a
                       maximum term of imprisonment of ten years or more is prescribed
                              in the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801, et seq.,
                              the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 951, et seq.,
                              the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, 46 U.S.C. App. §§ 1901, et seq., or
                              an offense under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 956(a), or 2332b.
                              an offense involving a minor under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1201, 1591, 2241, 2242, 2244(a)(1),
                              2245, 2251, 2251A, 2252(a)(1), 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(3), 2252A(a)(1), 2252A(a)(2),
                              2252A(a)(3), 2252A(a)(4), 2260, 2421, 2422, 2423, or 2425.

D.       Additional Directives
         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)(2)-(4), the Court directs that:

        The defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility
separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal;

         The defendant be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel; and

         That, on order of a court of the United States, or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in
charge of the corrections facility in which the defendant is confined deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal
for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:       June 2, 2021                                            /s/   Sheila K. Oberto                 .
                                                        UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.caed.394755.8.0.pdf
Size
174,572 bytes
SHA-256
8433c8800f25c96d00cb00b717a357cb054320047fb11e88fd2c99c15899db66
Our copy
gov.uscourts.caed.394755.8.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top