Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents ARP ESSER State Plan - New Jersey

ARP ESSER State Plan - New Jersey

Summary

This is New Jersey's State Plan for the American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund, on the Department of Education template. The template says ARP ESSER provides nearly $122 billion to States and that each SEA must submit its plan by June 7, 2021. In its response on progress, the NJDOE describes ESSER I and ESSER II set-aside funds, a minimum allocation of $25,000 per LEA for academic enrichment grants, and $100 million from the Coronavirus Relief Fund for reopening schools. It states that as of May 18, 2021, of the 810 LEAs and receiving schools surveyed, 367 (45%) were operating in a hybrid learning model.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Issuer
Congressional materials
Document type
Department Of Education Pdf Www Ed Gov 79597A51F3
Case
Department Of Education Pdf Www Ed Gov 79597A51F3

Cite this document

“ARP ESSER State Plan - New Jersey.” Original at www.ed.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/department-of-education-pdf-www-ed-gov-79597a51f3/, SHA-256 f070fb356a3db7b4f39a0572da7a549c19f410fa96c1e1368bb638ef455e593f.

Full text

Introduction
The American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (“ARP
ESSER”) Fund, authorized under the American Rescue Plan (“ARP”) Act of 2021, provides
nearly $122 billion to States to support the Nation’s schools in safely reopening and sustaining
safe operations of schools while meeting the academic, social, emotional, and mental health
needs of students resulting from the coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic. It is
particularly important that ARP ESSER funding will enable States and local educational
agencies (“LEAs”), and more directly schools, to support students who have been most severely
impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and are likely to have suffered the most because of
longstanding inequities in our communities and schools that have been exacerbated by the
COVID-19 pandemic.

The U.S. Department of Education (“Department”) is committed to working in partnership with
States so that these unprecedented resources are quickly put to work to ensure students have
sustained access to in-person instruction and that the resources are used to provide the effective
support students need as they persist through and recover from the impacts of the COVID-19
pandemic. The thoughtful and timely use of these funds will have a lasting impact on our
Nation’s schools and help to address the inequities in resources, services, and opportunities
available to our students.

This template presents an opportunity for States to share their plans for the use of ARP ESSER
funds with the public. The Department must approve a State educational agency’s (“SEA’s”)
plan in order to make the State’s remaining ARP ESSER allocation available for use. Please note
that the Department intends to issue ARP ESSER reporting requirements separately.

Instructions
Each SEA must provide descriptions and other information that address each requirement listed
below. An SEA may use this template or another format as long as every item and element is
addressed in the SEA’s response. Throughout this document, questions that refer to an SEA’s
ARP ESSER funding are referencing the total allocation to be received by the SEA, including
that which it allocates to its LEAs.

Each SEA must submit to the Department by June 7, 2021, either: (1) its ARP ESSER plan or
(2) the State requirements that preclude submission of the plan by that date and a date by which
it will be able to submit its complete ARP ESSER plan.

To submit the SEA’s plan, please email the plan to your Program Officer at
[State].OESE@ed.gov (e.g., Alabama.OESE@ed.gov).

In order to ensure transparency, the Department will post each plan on the Department’s website
when it is received and will indicate each plan’s approval status.

This template also allows States to fulfill the requirement of the Coronavirus Response and
Relief Supplemental Appropriations (“CRRSA”) Act ESSER II 6-month reporting requirement
in section 313(f) of the CRRSA Act.


                                                                                                     2
A. Describing the State’s Current Status and Needs

The Department recognizes the extraordinary efforts made by States, LEAs, and educators to
support students during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this section, SEAs will describe the
progress they have made, the priorities and student needs guiding their ARP ESSER funding
decisions, and their current and projected operating status.

          1. Progress and Promising Practices:

              Provide your assessment of the top 2–3 strategies that have been most effective in
              supporting the needs of students in your State during the COVID-19 pandemic,
              especially for students most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Please
              include, if applicable, how your State will submit and encourage its LEAs to
              submit lessons learned and best practices to the Department’s Safer Schools and
              Campuses Best Practices Clearinghouse so that they can be shared with other
              States and LEAs.

              [begin response]

              Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the NJDOE has developed and
              implemented a series of coordinated policy strategies that dramatically expanded
              the State’s and LEAs’ efforts to identify and address the academic and mental
              health impacts of the pandemic on New Jersey students and educators. These
              efforts help pave the way forward for our education community, investing heavily
              in the recovery and resiliency of all our students, schools, and educators,
              particularly those most disproportionately impacted by COVID-19.

              Key strategies have included:

              Strategy 1: Targeting federal COVID-19 relief funds to specific, high-impact
              programs and activities, including the following:

                  •   ESSER I State set-aside funds were made available to:
                      o Support formula grants to LEAs for the purchase of 1:1 instructional
                        devices (e.g. Chromebooks, iPads) and connectivity;
                      o Develop a Memorandum of Understanding with Rutgers, the State
                        University of New Jersey to implement a program to address the
                        social-emotional learning needs of students impacted by COVID-19;
                      o Support competitive grants for LEAs prioritizing activities that address
                        learning loss in students, the need for additional summer instruction,
                        compensatory education for students with Individualized Education
                        Programs (IEPs), Social Emotional Learning, and support for students
                        experiencing homelessness;


                                                                                               4
    o Support grants for LEAs that were not eligible for an allocation from
      the formula portion of the grant as a result of not having received
      funds under Title I, Part A of the ESEA in the 2019-20 school year
      (see the NJDOE’s formula grant allocation table here. Such LEAs are
      marked with an asterisk);
    o Support grants for public educational institutions, in which public
      school students are educated, that were not eligible for an allocation
      from the formula portion of the grant as a result of not being an LEA.
      Specifically, these subgrants were provided to: Special Services
      School Districts (SSSDs); educational institutions run by State
      agencies including the Department of Children and Families (DCF),
      the Department of Corrections (DOC); the Juvenile Justice Centers;
      and Juvenile Detention Centers; and
    o Districts that received funds under Title I, Part A of the ESEA in the
      2019-2020 school year, if applicable, to fund the difference between
      (1) the portion of its ESSER allocation the district must actually
      dedicate to equitable services for nonpublic schools (based on a
      nonpublic school’s share of total enrollment in the LEA, in accordance
      with guidance issued by the U.S. Department of Education), and (2)
      the portion of its ESSER allocation the district would have to dedicate
      to equitable services if equitable shares were based on a nonpublic
      school’s share of Title I-eligible students residing in the LEA.
•   ESSER II State set-aside funds supported:
    o Grants to LEAs to support research-based academic enrichment
      activities and strategies to support learning acceleration such as
      summer learning academies, school year learning acceleration
      academies, 1:1 tutoring, and professional learning for educators
      regarding the use of universal screening assessments and the use of
      extended day instructional time to effectively scaffold students’
      learning. These grants prioritized academic enrichment activities in
      content areas most impacted by COVID-19, such as STEM.
      Allocations of these funds were made in the same manner as the
      ESSER II allocations with a minimum allocation of $25,000 per LEA.
      Both Title I, Part A and non-Title I LEAs received an allocation.
    o Grants to LEAs to support the provision of mental health services and
      supports. These funds will be used to increase access to school-based
      mental health services and supports for both students and educators.
      Allocations of these funds were based upon total LEA enrollment with
      a minimum of $45,000 per LEA.
    o Grants to LEAs that were ineligible for an allocation from the formula
      portion of the grant as a result of not having received funds under Title
      I, Part A of the ESEA in the 2020-21 school year; and


                                                                               5
       o Grants to public educational institutions, in which public school
         students are educated, that were ineligible for an allocation from the
         formula portion of the grant as a result of not being an LEA.
         Specifically, these subgrants were provided to: SSSDs; educational
         institutions run by State agencies including the DCF and the DOC; the
         Juvenile Justice Centers; Juvenile Detention Centers; and County
         Jointure Commissions.
   •   New Jersey allocated $100 million from the Coronavirus Relief Fund to
       assist LEAs with defraying costs associated with reopening schools for the
       2020-2021 school year in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. The
       NJDOE ensured that all LEAs had access to these funds by providing an
       allocation for each student, while targeting funds to low-income
       communities that have been disproportionately impacted by the COVID-
       19 pandemic, by determining LEA allocations with a supplemental per
       pupil amount for each low income pupil.

Strategy 2: Enhancing efforts to identify and collect data regarding student
performance and access to learning opportunities that may be used to target
resources and supports, including:

Digital Divide Data
In summer 2020, the NJDOE launched a grant program to support LEAs in
purchasing digital learning devices and internet connectivity in order to ensure
that all students had access to remote instruction as necessary. At that time, the
NJDOE estimated that over 230,000 students were identified as in need of a
device or connectivity. In October 2020, to better track the state of the digital
divide and to provide more targeted supports to districts, the NJDOE released a
weekly student device and connectivity survey and required LEAs to provide data
to the NJDOE on the availability of devices and connectivity for every student.
By March 2021, each LEA reported zero students currently needing a device
and/or internet connection. Thus, the State was able to effectively use ESSER and
CRF funds and close the digital divide for New Jersey’s students.

Learning Environment Data
The NJDOE added new data fields to its existing student data collection to
capture the learning environment of each public school student, and the
attendance rate of each student in each learning environment. The new data fields
allow the NJDOE to determine the number of students receiving instruction in-
person, via a hybrid model, or in a remote environment, and whether the remote
environment was in response to a parent request. This data collection provided the
NJDOE with the insight necessary to assist LEAs with reopening and continuity
of educational services. This summer, the new data fields will provide the NJDOE
insight into the difference in attendance rates on days of in-person instruction
compared to days of remote instruction.


                                                                                 6
The NJDOE also maintains a daily dashboard of operating status for all LEAs and
approved private schools for students with disabilities. The dashboard provides a
regularly updated listing of the instructional model being employed in each LEA,
which are categorized as either hybrid, full in-person, remote, or a combination
model.

Interim Assessment Data Collection
To fill data gaps caused by interrupted statewide assessment administration and to
ensure that students are making meaningful growth toward grade-level standards,
LEAs provided the NJDOE with a snapshot of student learning during this school
year through the submission of district-level interim assessment data denoting
whether students were performing below, on, or above grade level for
mathematics, ELA, and science.

Screener Assessment
In fall 2020, the NJDOE made available an optional suite of beginning of year
screener assessments known as Start Strong. Based on student performance on
prior year standards, Start Strong determines the level of support that a student
might need to master the current year’s prerequisite skills and concepts. Start
Strong data helped LEAs effectively target resources and supports and develop
instruction and intervention plans. Pursuant to the U.S. Department of
Education’s April 6, 2021 correspondence, the NJDOE will administer Start
Strong in fall 2021 to meet ESSA general assessment requirements.

Strategy 3: Promoting sharing of information and successful practices
between LEAs:

Superintendent Advisory Groups
The NJDOE, in its ongoing efforts to learn from stakeholders, formed regional
district superintendent advisory groups in January 2021. The goal of convening
these groups is to provide the NJDOE and New Jersey superintendents with a
platform for the open exchange of thoughts and concerns regarding LEAs’ on-
going needs and challenges. LEA leads have been encouraged to share their
current challenges and forecast potential problems. There is one Short-Term
Group and one Long-Term Group in each region of the state that each meet
approximately every 2-3 weeks. These exchanges have provided the NJDOE with
real-time updates and insight on short and long-term needs from school district
superintendents in the field.

Clearinghouse of Successful Practices
On February 19, 2021, the NJDOE launched its clearinghouse of successful
practices that LEAs have identified as notable achievements in mitigating the
challenges posed by COVID-19. District-reported successes are categorized by
county, district size, and topic area to facilitate meaningful collaboration and
learning opportunities between similarly-situated districts. These data provide
                                                                                    7
   focused, tested, and context-specific practices to help LEAs develop strategies to
   address issues related to learning gaps, attendance, lack of access to nutrition,
   housing, other critical needs, and LEA operations.

   ESSER Technical Assistance
   In an effort to support the effective use of the ESSER funds the NJDOE has
   conducted multiple technical assistance sessions for LEAs. Sessions were
   conducted in partnership with stakeholder groups as well. Each session provides
   an opportunity for LEAs to ask questions and share information on how best to
   utilize the funding to address issues related to COVID-19. The NJDOE has also
   developed a series of webpages with guidance for LEAs and is in the process of
   finalizing an FAQ document that responds to common questions from the field.

   [end response]

2. Overall Priorities

   Provide your assessment of the top 2–3 issues currently facing students and
   schools across your State as a result of or in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
   including, to the extent possible, data illustrating why these are the most critical
   and/or most widespread issues facing schools and students.

   [begin response]

   Issue 1: Variation in Learning Models

   As of May 18, 2021, of the 810 LEAs and receiving schools surveyed by the
   NJDOE: 367 (45%) were operating in a hybrid learning model, enrolling 682,448
   (50%) students; 391 (48%) were operating in an in-person model, enrolling
   469,743 (35%) students; 9 (1%) in a remote model, enrolling 44,272 (3%)
   students; and 43 (5%) employing a variety of models across school buildings,
   enrolling 156,937 (12%) students. This variation in learning models across the
   state raises concerns regarding the impact of school closures on academic and
   social emotional health of students and educators, as well as concerns regarding
   the ability of the NJDOE and LEAs to effectively share actionable, comparable
   strategies and data to target resources and supports.

   Research has made clear that the more time that a student spends outside of the
   classroom, the greater the risk of missed learning opportunities and of negative
   social, emotional, and mental health impacts. Research has also suggested that
   these setbacks are not spread evenly amongst all students, with students with
   disabilities, English learners, low-income students, Black and Hispanic students,
   and students experiencing homelessness or in foster care hardest hit by the
   disruptions of school closures. Addressing the impact of reduced access to in-
   person learning is among the NJDOE’s most urgent priorities. According to data
   collected by the NJDOE, in mid-October 2020, roughly half of the State’s
   students were enrolled in school districts that offered some form of in-person
                                                                                        8
instruction (52.3% versus 47.7% in school districts that were remote-only).
School districts that offered some form of in-person instruction in mid-October
served a disproportionate share of the State’s White students (70.4%). Similarly,
school districts that were remote-only in mid-October served a disproportionate
share of the State’s Black or African American students (70.7%), English
Learners (65.5%) and economically disadvantaged students (65.1%).

Beyond the impact on students and educators, variations in learning models across
the State also complicate State and local efforts to share success stories and data
regarding the impact of COVID-19, as the specific contexts in which strategies
would be implemented and data extracted vary so considerably, hindering
comparability.

Issue 2: Unfinished Learning

COVID-19 presented unprecedented challenges to PreK–12 public education.
Among the most significant is unfinished learning as a result of students and
educators struggling with different instructional models, shortened instructional
days, and other effects of the public health emergency. When the crisis began,
students across the State, particularly those in low-income communities, already
lacked access to the computers and connectivity that would make remote learning
possible. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated equity gaps that already existed.
National research conducted by the NWEA (previously the Northwest Evaluation
Association) has indicated that learning gaps resulting from COVID 19 pandemic
may result in learning deficits of 30% in reading and up to 50% in math. It is also
clear that learning gaps existed prior to the pandemic and that gaps are likely to
grow without well-defined plans and execution of targeted interventions.
According to a 2021 NAEP survey, 31% of fourth graders and 51% of eighth
graders in New Jersey receive more than 5 hours of live instruction per day; 20%
of fourth graders receive 1–2 hours of live instruction daily; and only 3% of
eighth graders are receiving the same.

Issue 3: Social, Emotional, and Mental Health Needs

The NJDOE recognizes the events of the past 15 months have been severely
stressful and traumatic for students. As of May 18, 2021, over 23,000 New
Jerseyans have died as a result of COVID-19 and over 2 million New Jerseyans
lost their employment as a result of the virus. The impact of these losses, of both
life and financial security, have been deeply felt by students throughout the State.

The physical isolation required to combat the virus, especially in the early months
of the pandemic, undoubtedly took a toll on the social emotional well-being of
students, but it also presented an increased risk for child abuse or neglect.
Unfortunately, the full extent of the increase in child abuse and neglect is
unknown because students were not reporting to school and interacting with
adults from outside of their household who could have intervened and/or reported

                                                                                    9
   allegations or suspicions of abuse. Beginning in spring 2020, the New Jersey
   Department of Children and Families reported an approximate 60% decrease in
   the number of referrals to the State’s child abuse hotline from the previous year.
   Since school district staff continue to be New Jersey’s primary reporters of
   allegations of child abuse, the decline in cases likely correlates to schools being
   closed for in-person instruction. By March 2021, referrals of child abuse
   allegations were significantly closer to numbers seen before the pandemic, which
   suggests the increase of in-person instruction and interaction has helped to bring
   attention to concerns of abuse. The significant decrease in referrals is of great
   concern and the impact of any untreated abuses will require support from school
   districts and other providers.

   The isolation of quarantining and social distancing, uncertainties, hardships, and
   decrease in typical support structures during the pandemic have impacted the
   mental health and well-being of students. In a survey conducted of New Jersey
   superintendents by the New Jersey School Boards Association from November
   16, 2020 to January 8, 2021, 47.73% of those surveyed indicated that, “[w]e don’t
   see more students in crisis, but in general students are more anxious and
   depressed.” Even more alarming are anecdotal reports from our sister agencies
   and community partners that are in alignment with the CDC’s national findings
   that mental health-related visits to hospital emergency departments increased
   sharply from mid-March 2020 and continued into October 2020. The CDC
   reported mental health-related visits to hospital emergency departments increased
   24% among children aged 5–11 years and 31% among adolescents aged 12–17
   years, compared with the same period in 2019. Data from the New Jersey
   Hospital Association’s Center for Health Analytics, Research, and Transformation
   found that a higher percentage of youth presented with a mental, behavioral, or
   drug/substance use disorder diagnosis during the pandemic compared to prior
   years.

   While it will take time before there is a comprehensive understanding of the
   pandemic’s impact on the well-being of youth, the data above suggest that many
   students are likely to return to their classrooms in 2021-2022 burdened by
   stressors and trauma that shake the sense of safety and wellbeing necessary for
   academic learning. It is imperative, therefore, that educators recognize that social,
   emotional, and mental health supports are critical to reduce stressors, mitigate the
   impact of trauma, and develop coping and resiliency skills to support the well-
   being of students.

   [end response]

3. Identifying Needs of Underserved Students

   Describe your State’s 2–3 highest priority academic, social, emotional, and/or
   mental health needs for the remainder of the 2020-2021 school year (if applicable)
   and for the 2021-2022 school year related to the impact of the COVID-19
   pandemic on each of the following student groups:
                                                                                      10
                i.     Students from low-income families,
                ii.    Students from each racial or ethnic group (e.g., identifying disparities and
                       focusing on underserved student groups by race or ethnicity),
                iii.   Gender (e.g., identifying disparities and focusing on underserved student
                       groups by gender),
                iv.    English learners,
                v.     Children with disabilities (including infants, toddlers, children, and youth
                       with disabilities eligible under the Individuals with Disabilities Education
                       Act (“IDEA”)),
                vi.    Students experiencing homelessness,
                vii.   Children and youth in foster care,
                viii. Migratory students, and
                ix.    Other groups disproportionately impacted by the pandemic that have been
                       identified by the SEA (e.g., youth involved in the criminal justice system,
                       students who have missed the most in-person instruction during the 2019-
                       2020 and 2020-2021 school years, students who did not consistently
                       participate in remote instruction when offered during school building
                       closures, and LGBTQ+ students).
                To the extent possible, this description should include data on indicators such as
                estimates of the academic impact of lost instructional time,1 chronic absenteeism,
                student engagement, and social-emotional well-being.

                [begin response]

                The NJDOE prioritized the needs of the identified student groups through its
                targeted use of the ESSER Fund State set-aside funds as described throughout
                NJ’s ARP ESSER State Plan. To further inform this work, the NJDOE will utilize
                a variety of data sources to explore the impact of COVID-19 on the identified
                student groups. This review will be an extension of work already being conducted
                throughout the NJDOE in an attempt to identify and mitigate the negative impact
                of COVID-19 on New Jersey students, families and educators.

                For example, the NJDOE will analyze chronic absenteeism and learning
                environment data. Early in the pandemic, the NJDOE recognized that student
                learning environment data would be critical in understanding how students were
                being impacted by school closures. As a result, learning environment fields were


1
 For the purposes of the plan, “academic impact of lost instructional time” refers to “learning loss”
experienced by students as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, as referenced in the ARP Act and the
CRRSA Act.
                                                                                                        11
added to the NJDOE’s student information data collections. Updated data will be
available to the NJDOE in August and will be disaggregated by student group at
the school, district and state level so that it can inform the NJDOE’s initiatives.
Additionally, the NJDOE will utilize graduation rate and retention data which will
be available in fall 2021 to further analyze the impact of COVID-19 on the
identified student groups. Another important data point will be the results of the
2020-2021 DLM and ACCESS for ELLs assessments, both of which were
administered in spring 2021. This data will be available in the late fall and will
play a critical role in informing instructional design and decision-making.

Additionally, earlier this year the NJDOE collected LEA-level interim assessment
data denoting the percentage of students in the LEA performing below, on, or
above grade level for mathematics, ELA, and science. These data provided a mid-
year snapshot of student performance based on local, interim assessments
administered by the LEA between November 16, 2020 and February 19, 2021.
Districts reported assessment participation and performance, disaggregated by
subgroup, for grades K–10 in ELA, K–8 and course-level performance in math,
and K–11 and course-level performance in science.

While the types of assessments used to determine grade-level performance, the
point in time at which those assessments were administered, and other important
factors varied across LEAs, the below state-level snapshot may help identify
performance trends, gaps, and opportunities.




                                                                                12
                        NJDOE's Interim Assessment Data Collection
                                          ELA
                                    Statewide Results

Student Group                # Participant   % Below     % At Grade   % Above
                             Scores          Grade Level Level        Grade Level
                             Reported
All Students                 945,969         37%        38%           25%
White                        399,076         27%        44%           29%
Black or African
American                     137,804         51%        33%           16%
Hispanic                     258,797         52%        31%           17%
Asian                        104,514         18%        38%           44%
American Indian or
Alaska Native                2,000           37%        42%           22%
Native Hawaiian or
Pacific Islander             2,209           29%        43%           28%
Two or More Races            41,569          32%        40%           28%
Economically
Disadvantaged                296,835         54%        30%           16%
English Learners             70,719          65%        22%           12%
Students with Disabilities   130,878         57%        31%           13%
Migrant Students             365             48%        35%           16%
Military-Connected
Students                     5,810           34%        47%           18%
Homeless Students            4,584           62%        27%           11%




                                                                              13
                        NJDOE's Interim Assessment Data Collection
                                          Math
                                    Statewide Results

Student Group                # Participant   % Below     % At Grade   % Above
                             Scores          Grade Level Level        Grade Level
                             Reported
All Students                 1,016,551       37%        38%           24%
White                        434,095         28%        45%           27%
Black or African
American                     146,154         56%        30%           14%
Hispanic                     279,335         52%        31%           17%
Asian                        108,588         16%        37%           47%
American Indian or
Alaska Native                2,130           36%        40%           24%
Native Hawaiian or
Pacific Islander             2,456           31%        43%           26%
Two or More Races            43,793          34%        40%           26%
Economically
Disadvantaged                317,875         55%        29%           16%
English Learners             77,560          60%        24%           16%
Students with Disabilities   142,572         55%        31%           14%
Migrant Students             400             54%        31%           15%
Military-Connected
Students                     6,221           33%        50%           17%
Homeless Students            4,902           61%        28%           11%




                                                                              14
                         NJDOE's Interim Assessment Data Collection
                                          Science
                                     Statewide Results

Student Group                # Participant   % Below     % At Grade   % Above
                             Scores          Grade Level Level        Grade Level
                             Reported
All Students                 793,852         21%         45%          33%
White                        352,619         13%         51%          36%
Black or African
American                     99,191          37%         40%          23%
Hispanic                     206,353         34%         41%          24%
Asian                        97,951          8%          41%          52%
American Indian or
Alaska Native                1,476           22%         47%          32%
Native Hawaiian or
Pacific Islander             2,257           19%         45%          35%
Two or More Races            34,005          18%         48%          34%
Economically
Disadvantaged                223,175         38%         38%          24%
English Learners             50,511          42%         35%          22%
Students with Disabilities   113,331         33%         45%          22%
Migrant Students             345             31%         43%          26%
Military-Connected
Students                     5,373           18%         60%          22%
Homeless Students            3,437           46%         37%          17%

        [end response]




                                                                              15
4. Understanding the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

   Describe how the SEA will support its LEAs in identifying the extent of the
   impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student learning and student well-being,
   including identifying the groups of students most impacted by the pandemic.
   Where possible, please identify the data sources the SEA will suggest its LEAs
   use in thoughtfully diagnosing areas of need, including data on the academic,
   social, emotional, and mental health impacts of lost instructional time.

   [begin response]

   The NJDOE will provide a variety of supports to its LEAs to aid their
   identification of the extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student
   learning and student well-being.

   ARP ESSER Needs Assessment

   As part of its application for ARP ESSER funds, each LEA will be required to
   complete a needs assessment. That assessment will prompt the LEA to undertake
   a comprehensive accounting of the specific needs of its students and educators,
   including descriptions of the root causes of those needs, the qualitative and
   quantitative data sources used to determine the needs, and how ARP ESSER
   funds will be used to meet those needs. The NJDOE regularly provides technical
   assistance and guidance for LEAs on conducting effective, thoughtful needs
   assessments, including data sources that might be considered, such as locally-
   administered assessments and statewide assessments. As part of the technical
   assistance sessions conducted for the ESSER II funds, the NJDOE provided
   examples and guiding questions for LEAs to utilize when planning for the
   effective use of the ESSER Funds, including considerations to support the social,
   emotional mental health of students and staff. The ARP ESSER technical
   assistance sessions will build on this work and encourage LEAs to view school
   improvement as a continuous, systemic and cyclical process.


   Annual School Plan System (ASPS)

   The NJDOE regularly conducts technical assistance sessions for schools required
   under the ESEA to complete annual school plans (i.e. schools identified for CSI,
   TSI, ATSI, and schools implementing Title I schoolwide programs). Those
   technical assistance sessions provide detailed guidance on how the ASPS may be




                                                                                    16
leveraged to identify and remediate the impact of COVID-19, including guidance
on identifying data to fill gaps caused by the closure schools to in-person learning.
Guidance, for example, might address the use of local assessment data to drive
strategies to remediate learning gaps, and goals and action steps for implementing
those strategies.

CARES Act ESSER Set-Aside Learning Loss Grant

In addition, the NJDOE utilized approximately $2.5 million in CARES Act
ESSER Funds to establish the Addressing Student Learning Loss grant. The goal
of projects funded under this grant is to significantly reduce students’ learning
loss resulting from school closures due to COVID-19 through the implementation
of evidence-based interventions that scale-up and enhance existing academic
and/or non-academic programs and initiatives that mitigate further learning loss
and accelerate academic progress. The application provided a comprehensive
framework for LEAs to identify the extent of the impact of COVID-19 on student
learning and student well-being. For example, successful applicants provided
specific information regarding:
   1) the achievement, performance, and/or non-academic data used to identify
      the specific student subgroups that will benefit most from programs and
      services funded under the NGO. The data must analyze performance for
      all student subgroups within the district and/or schools, targeted grade-
      levels, and content area(s) of the project; and
   2) the data-based decision-making process used to analyze data, identify
      students, and match students to specific evidence-based interventions or
      strategies.

State Implementation and Scaling-up of Evidence-Based Practices (SISEP)
Project

The NJDOE is currently partnering with the University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill through the State Implementation and Scaling-up of Evidence-Based
Practices (SISEP) project. As part of this collaboration, the NJDOE participates in
ongoing technical assistance sessions designed to improve implementation
infrastructure to advance effective education practices. The SISEP State Liaison
meets regularly with the NJDOE implementation team to provide professional
learning and coaching, and virtual support for team development and
implementation capacity efforts. This work will improve the NJDOE’s ability to
implement evidence-based interventions with fidelity which will, in turn, improve
the impact of the selected intervention. By building its internal capacity, the
NJDOE will be better situated to assist LEAs in identifying the extent of the
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student learning and student well-being.

Climate Assessment Tool

                                                                                  17
   The NJDOE will provide LEAs with the opportunity to utilize a newly designed
   comprehensive school climate assessment tool to understand the perceptions of
   students, staff, and families in order to identify and respond to the emergent and
   ongoing school climate needs in fall 2021. LEAs will be granted access to a
   provisional online platform which collects and analyzes data that can be utilized
   to facilitate the development of safe and supportive learning environments.

   School Health Assessment and Performance Evaluation

   The NJDOE will encourage LEAs to utilize the free tool from the National Center
   for School Mental Health, School Health Assessment and Performance Evaluation
   (SHAPE). SHAPE allows LEAs to: map their mental health services and
   supports; assess system quality using national performance standards; receive
   custom reports and strategic planning, guidance and resources, including access to
   the Screening and Assessment Library and Trauma-Responsive Schools
   Assessment and Resources; and access other LEAs in order to support the
   development of communities of practices.

   Screener Assessment

   As described in section A.1, the NJDOE’s Start Strong assessment will assist
   LEAs in identifying academic areas of support students may need as they begin
   the 2021-2022 school year and in effectively targeting resources and supports and
   developing instruction and intervention plans based on student needs.

   [end response]

5. School Operating Status

   It is essential to have data on how students are learning in order to support the
   goals of access and equity, especially for student groups that have been
   disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Describe the current
   status of data collection on operational status and mode of instruction of all
   schools in your State. This description must include:
      i. A description of to what extent, and how frequently, the State collects now
         and will collect in the future data for all schools in your State on:
          a. Mode of instruction: The number of schools in your State that are
             offering fully remote or online-only instruction; both remote/online
             and in-person instruction (hybrid model); and/or full-time in-person
             instruction;
          b. Enrollment: Student enrollment for all students and disaggregated for
             each of the student groups described in A.3.i–viii for each mode of
             instruction; and



                                                                                       18
c. Attendance: Student attendance for all students and disaggregated for
   each of the student groups described in A.3.i–viii for each mode of
   instruction.

[begin response]

Mode of Instruction

As described above, the NJDOE maintains a daily dashboard of operating
status for all LEAs and approved private schools for students with
disabilities. The dashboard provides a regularly updated listing of the
instructional model being employed in each LEA, which are categorized
as either hybrid, full in-person, remote, or a combination model, meaning
that the LEA employs multiple instructional models across its school
buildings. Additionally, it is worth noting that all LEAs, regardless of their
operating status, are required to offer all students the option to participate
in fulltime remote learning through the end of the 2020-2021 school year
and during 2021 summer programming.

Enrollment

The NJDOE’s student data collection, which occurs twice each school
year on October 15 and June 30, allows the NJDOE to disaggregate
school- and LEA-level student enrollment data by subgroup. As described
above, this fall, the NJDOE added data fields to this collection which
require LEAs to report the learning environment of every public school
student. The student learning environment field reflects the student’s
learning environment over the course of the school year. Students can be
fulltime in-person, hybrid, fulltime remote due to district or fulltime
remote due to family choice. For example, students who are full-time
remote due to district choice on October 15th but shift to a hybrid
schedule in the winter and to fulltime on premises by spring would be
marked as: “Fulltime remote—district” on October 15th and “Hybrid” on
June 30th because they received instruction partially in person and partially
remote over the course of their membership in the current school year. The
attendance fields, described below, provide insight into the exact number
of school days students spent in a remote learning environment.

Attendance

The NJDOE’s June 30th student data collection includes attendance data
fields that allow the NJDOE to disaggregate student attendance by
subgroup. As described above, this fall the NJDOE added new attendance
data fields to this collection in order to determine student attendance on
days of remote instruction versus days of in-person instruction. This


                                                                           19
                    information will aid the NJDOE in addressing the extent of the impact of
                    the COVID-19 pandemic on student educational trajectories.

                    [end response]

                ii. The data described in A.5.i.a. and b. using the template in Appendix A (and
                    to the extent available, the data described in A.5.i.c.) for the most recent
                    time period available. Please note that this data can be submitted separately
                    within 14 calendar days after a State submits this plan. The SEA must also
                    make this data publicly available on its website as soon as possible but no
                    later than June 21, 2021, and regularly provide updated available
                    information on its website. The Department will periodically review data
                    listed in A.5.i on SEA websites.

                   [begin response]

                   The NJDOE will provide the data to the extent available and post it to its
                   website by June 21, 2021.

                   [end response]

                iii. To the extent available, a description of the planned operational status and
                     mode of instruction for the State and its LEAs for Summer 2021 and for
                     the 2021-2022 school year.

                    [begin response]

                    In Summer 2021 and the 2021-2022 school year, the NJDOE expects that
                    school districts will operate in a full in-person model to the greatest extent
                    possible and consistent with applicable health and safety guidelines. On
                    May 17, 2021, Governor Murphy announced that school districts will be
                    required to fully open buildings beginning fall 2021, with remote learning
                    permitted only in the event that there is a localized outbreak or other
                    emergency. In the 2021-2022 school year, if buildings are open for in-
                    person instruction, parents or guardians will not be able to opt their child
                    out of in-person instruction. The NJDOE understands that in-person
                    instruction provides the greatest opportunities for learning acceleration,
                    therefore on-going support is being provided to school district leaders so
                    they can address any foreseeable challenges. From the beginning of the
                    pandemic, NJDOE guidance has encouraged districts to operate using an
                    in-person model to the extent safe and feasible, while planning as needed
                    to implement any shifts due to changes in COVID-19 risk level data.

                    [end response]

B. Safely Reopening Schools and Sustaining their Safe Operations

                                                                                                20
The Department recognizes that safely reopening schools and sustaining their safe operations to
maximize in-person instruction is essential for student learning and student well-being, and
especially for being able to address the educational inequities that have been worsened by the
COVID-19 pandemic. In this section, SEAs will describe how they will support their LEAs in
this vital area.

          1.   Support for LEAs

               Describe how the SEA will support its LEAs in safely returning to in-person
               instruction and sustaining the safe operation of schools. This description must
               include:

                  i. How the SEA will support its LEAs implementing, to the greatest extent
                     practicable, prevention and mitigation policies in line with the most up-to-
                     date guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                     (“CDC”) for the reopening and operation of school facilities to effectively
                     maintain the health and safety of students, educators, and other staff;

                      [begin response]

                      Since the State’s health and safety requirements for re-opening schools in
                      the 2020-2021 school year went into effect in summer 2020, the NJDOE
                      has provided targeted, individualized supports to LEAs unable to fully
                      reopen for in-person instruction. Supports were delivered based on the
                      specific mitigation strategy that the LEA identifies as preventing the return
                      to in-person instruction. Supports include identifying funding streams that
                      may be used to help implement mitigation strategies, distributing face
                      masks, providing technical assistance in adhering to relevant state and
                      federal rules, and identifying and sharing successful practices among
                      LEAs. The NJDOE also worked closely with the New Jersey Department
                      of Health in their development of COVID-19 public health
                      recommendations for local health departments for K–12 schools. That
                      support has helped LEAs implement mitigation policies described above;
                      as of April 26, 2021, nearly 90% of LEAs were offering at least some in-
                      person instruction. To the extent that the State imposes requirements
                      regarding implementation of health and safety protocol for the 2021-2022
                      school year, the NJDOE will continue to provide this level of
                      individualized, LEA-specific supports.

                      Additionally, the NJDOE is in the process of hiring a State School Nurse
                      Consultant, who will provide instrumental support for school nurses and
                      other school health staff in understanding and implementing health and
                      safety strategies for the return to in-person instruction. The NJDOE will
                      also make clear in its ARP ESSER guidance that ESSER funds may be
                      used to implement mitigation strategies in line with CDC guidance.

                                                                                                 21
   [end response]

ii. Any Statewide plans, policies, estimated timelines, and specific milestones
    related to reopening and operation of school facilities, including any
    mechanisms the SEA will use to track, monitor, or enforce their
    implementation;

   [begin response]

   On May 17, 2021, Governor Murphy announced that school districts will
   be required to fully open buildings beginning fall 2021. In the 2021-2022
   school year, parents or guardians will not be able to opt their child out of
   in-person instruction. The NJDOE understands that in-person instruction
   provides the greatest opportunities for learning acceleration, therefore on-
   going support is being provided to school district leaders so they can
   address any foreseeable challenges.

   [end response]

iii. To what extent the SEA and its LEAs consult with Federal, State, and
     local health officials. This description should include, if available, whether
     the SEA and its LEAs have received support for screening testing from
     their State or local health department based on funding awarded by the
     CDC; and

   [begin response]

   The NJDOE has maintained regular, ongoing consultation with the New
   Jersey State Department of Health (NJDOH) since the onset of the
   COVID-19 pandemic. All state guidance regarding health and safety
   protocol for PK–12 education services are developed, implemented, and
   enforced collaboratively by NJDOH and NJDOE. This includes the State’s
   administration of funds awarded by the CDC to support screening testing
   in K–12 schools. The state of New Jersey received $267.5 million in ELC
   Reopening Schools funds that will be used to support screening testing
   programs in K–12 schools.

   At the local level, LEAs consult regularly with local health officials; all
   NJDOE and NJDOH guidance insists that all local decision-making
   regarding health and safety operations of K–12 schools be made by LEAs
   in close consultation with community members and local health officials.

   [end response]

iv. Any guidance, professional learning, and technical assistance
    opportunities the SEA will make available to its LEAs.

   [begin response]
                                                                                22
                       As outlined above, the NJDOE will provide routine and comprehensive
                       guidance and technical assistance to its LEAs in the form of guidance on
                       the use of ESSER funds, direct supports provided by the NJDOE’s county
                       offices, and technical assistance based on the specific mitigation strategies
                       that LEAs identify as barriers to the return to in-person learning. As part
                       of its ongoing support for LEAs on the effective use of the ESSER funds,
                       the NJDOE created an interactive website that provides up to date
                       information on all grant opportunities funded through the ESSER funds as
                       well as links to relevant NJDOE and Federal guidance. The NJDOE has
                       partnered with stakeholder organizations to conduct technical assistance
                       sessions and collaborated on the development of a frequently asked
                       questions document.

                       [end response]

           2. Return to In-Person Instruction and Continuity of Services Plans

               Describe how the SEA will ensure that its LEAs that receive ARP ESSER funds
               meet the requirements in section 2001(i) of the ARP Act and the requirements
               relating to the ARP ESSER funds published in the Federal Register and available
               at https://oese.ed.gov/offices/american-rescue-plan/american-rescue-plan-
               elementary-and-secondary-school-emergency-relief/ (ARP ESSER requirements)
               to either: (a) within 30 days of receipt of the funds, develop and make publicly
               available on the LEA’s website a plan for the safe return to in-person instruction
               and continuity of services, or (b) have developed and made publicly available on
               the LEA’s website such a plan that meets statutory requirements before the
               enactment of the ARP Act, including:

                   i. How the SEA will ensure that each LEA plan includes, or will be modified
                      to include, the extent to which it has adopted policies and a description of
                      any such policies on each of the strategies listed in table B1;

                   ii. How the SEA will ensure that each LEA plan describes how it will ensure
                       continuity of services including but not limited to services to address the
                       students’ academic needs, and students’ and staff social, emotional, mental
                       health, and other needs, which may include student health and food
                       services;

                   iii. How the SEA will ensure that the LEA periodically reviews, no less
                        frequently than every six months for the duration of the ARP ESSER grant
                        period (i.e., through September 30, 2023),2 and revises as appropriate, its

2
 ARP ESSER funds are subject to the Tydings amendment in section 421(b) of the General Education
Provisions Act, 20 U.S.C. 1225(b), and are therefore available to SEAs and LEAs for obligation through
September 30, 2024. Review and revisions of these plans, if necessary, are not required during the
Tydings period.
                                                                                                     23
                        plan, and how the SEA will ensure that the LEA seeks public input, and
                        takes such input into account on (1) whether revisions are necessary and,
                        if so, (2) the revisions to the plan; and

                   iv. Describe, to the extent the SEA collects it, information about LEA
                       implementation, to the greatest extent practicable, of each element of the
                       most up-to-date CDC guidance listed in table B1 and its LEAs’ needs for
                       support and technical assistance to implement strategies consistent, to the
                       greatest extent practicable, with relevant CDC guidance.

                        [begin response]

                        The NJDOE will require that, within 30 days of the NJDOE making ARP
                        ESSER applications available to LEAs, each LEA submit to the NJDOE
                        and post to the LEA’s website the LEA’s Safe Return to In-Person
                        Instruction and Continuity of Services Plan. To ensure that each such plan
                        meets the minimum statutory requirements, and the requirements
                        described in this question, the NJDOE will provide a template that
                        incorporates all required information. The NJDOE will further require that
                        LEAs submit to the NJDOE and post to their websites any revisions of
                        such plans at least every six months through the ARP ESSER grant period.

                        Regarding question B.2.iv - prior to reopening in the 2020-2021 school
                        year, the NJDOE collected a checklist from each LEA assuring the LEA’s
                        compliance with the State’s health and safety standards if the LEA was
                        opening for in-person instruction. If any health and safety protocols are
                        required for the 2021-2022 school year, the NJDOE will support LEAs
                        providing in-person instruction in adherence to those protocols.

                        [end response]

C. Planning for the Use and Coordination of ARP ESSER Funds

The Department recognizes that seeking input from diverse stakeholders is essential to
developing plans for the use of ARP ESSER funds that are responsive to the needs of students,
families, and educators. In this section, SEAs will describe their plans for consultation and for
coordinating the use of ARP ESSER funds with other resources to meet the needs of students.

           1. SEA Consultation

               Consistent with the ARP ESSER requirements, describe how the SEA engaged in
               meaningful consultation with stakeholders, and incorporated input into its plan,
               including, but not limited to:
                  i.    students;
                  ii.   families;
                                                                                                    24
  iii.   Tribes (if applicable);
  iv.    civil rights organizations (including disability rights organizations);
  v.     school and district administrators (including special education
         administrators);
  vi.    superintendents;
  vii. charter school leaders (if applicable);
  viii. teachers, principals, school leaders, other educators, school staff, and
        their unions; and
  ix.    stakeholders representing the interests of children with disabilities,
         English learners, children experiencing homelessness, children and youth
         in foster care, migratory students, children who are incarcerated, and
         other underserved students.

The description must include how the SEA provided the public the opportunity to
provide input in the development of the plan, a summary of the input (including
any letters of support), and how the SEA took such input into account.

[begin response]

The NJDOE sought input from a broad range stakeholders in the development of
this ARP ESSER State Plan, including those identified in prompt C.1 above, state
legislators, and members of the New Jersey State Board of Education. In total, the
NJDOE reviewed this ARP ESSER State Plan with and sought input on it from 35
stakeholder associations that represent New Jersey’s diverse education
community. The NJDOE also provided the public and LEAs notice and
opportunity to provide input in the development of the plan. A full draft of the
plan and a user-friendly summary were posted to the NJDOE’s website and
distributed to LEAs in the manner in which the NJDOE customarily provides
notice and opportunity to comment to the public. The NJDOE received 42 emails
or other correspondence providing input. That input was taken into account in the
development of this plan.

Major themes of this input included:

    •    Any activities funded by the State set-aside funds should:

            o address the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on various
              underserved student groups, including English learners and
              students with disabilities;

            o support meaningful enrichment activities in a broad range of
              academic content areas, including STEM and the arts, as well as

                                                                                   25
                     non-academic enrichment such as social-emotional learning,
                     extracurricular programming, and re-socialization among students;

                o foster collaboration among interdisciplinary teams at LEAs
                  (including teachers, administrators, school nurses, school
                  librarians, counselors, and other support staff) to develop holistic
                  interventions that address students’ academic, social, emotional,
                  and health needs. Relatedly, State set-aside funds should bolster
                  supply of/access to those critical LEA staff – or high-quality
                  community providers of educational services – while considering
                  the sustainability of any programs funded by grants with a limited
                  period of availability;

        •   Should the NJDOE utilize its State set-aside to establish grants for LEAs,
            any such grants should be made on a formula, rather than competitive
            basis, to minimize burden on LEAs; and

        •   ARP ESSER implementation should be continuously informed by as
            many sources of high-quality student performance data as possible,
            potentially including student performance on LEAs’ benchmark and
            interim assessments.

    The NJDOE took this input into account in developing its uses of State set-aside
    funds. See Section D. for additional details.

    [end response]

2. Coordinating Funds

Describe to what extent the SEA has and will coordinate Federal COVID-19
pandemic funding and other Federal funding. This description must include:

i. How the SEA and its LEAs 1) are using or have used prior to the submission of
   this plan and 2) plan to use following submission of this plan, Federal COVID-19
   funding under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”)
   Act and the CRRSA Act to support a safe return to and safely maximize in-person
   instruction, sustain these operations safely, and address the disproportionate
   impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individual student groups (including
   students from low-income families, children with disabilities, English learners,
   racial or ethnic minorities, students experiencing homelessness, children and youth
   in foster care, and migratory students);




                                                                                    26
                Table C1.

                  Funding source     Prior/current SEA        Planned SEA and
                                     and LEA uses             LEA uses (including
                                     (including funding       funding amounts, if
                                     amounts, if              applicable)
                                     applicable)
                  ESSER I (CARES     Please see question      --
                  Act)               A.1 for the uses of
                                     ESSER I State set-
                                     aside funds.
                  GEER I (CARES      N/A – all GEER I         --
                  Act)               funds were dedicated
                                     to higher education
                                     and allocated by New
                                     Jersey’s Office of the
                                     Secretary of Higher
                                     Education.
                  ESSER II (CRRSA    Please see question      --
                  Act)               A.1 for the uses of
                                     ESSER II State set-
                                     aside funds.
                  GEER II (CRRSA     All CRRSA Act            CRRSA Act Section
                  Act)               Section 312(b) GEER      312(d) GEER funds
                                     II funds were            allocated to EANS
                                     dedicated to higher      will be used in
                                     education and            accordance with that
                                     allocated by New         statute for services
                                     Jersey’s Office of the   for eligible nonpublic
                                     Secretary of Higher      schools.
                                     Education.

ii. To what extent ESSER I and ESSER II funds have been awarded to LEAs and, if
    funds have not yet been made available to LEAs, when they will be. In addition,
    please provide any available information on the total dollar amounts of ESSER I
    and ESSER II funds that have been obligated but not expended by the SEA and its
    LEAs, including whether the SEA is able to track LEA obligations.

   [begin response]

    As of 4/26/2021, for ESSER I, the following amounts have been made available
    to LEAs, or obligated but not expended by the SEA:
    •   Funds made available to LEAs: $294,952,374
    •   SEA obligated but not expended: $5,994,629.31


                                                                                       27
               As of 4/26/2021, for ESSER II, the following has been made available to LEAs,
               or obligated but not expended by the SEA:
               •   Funds made available to LEAs: $1,113,953,770.00
               •   SEA obligated but not expended: $116,366,419.00

               The NJDOE keeps track of reimbursements through the twice-monthly
               reimbursement opportunities. The NJDOE does not have information on LEA
               obligations and is not able to track LEA obligations.

               [end response]

           iii. In supporting LEAs as they plan for the safe return to and continuity of in-person
                instruction and for meeting the academic, social, emotional, and mental health
                needs of students resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, the extent to which the
                SEA is also using other Federal funding sources including but not limited to under
                the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (“ESEA”), IDEA,
                Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (“WIOA”), funding for child nutrition
                services, and McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act, and the funds to support
                the needs of students experiencing homelessness provided by section 2001(b)(1) of
                the ARP Act.3

               [begin response]

               The NJDOE provided detailed guidance on how federal funds, including funds
               under ESEA, IDEA, and Perkins, can be used during the COVID-19 pandemic on
               specific student and educator needs related to reopening schools.

               Additionally, the NJDOE has used or will use funds from the following programs:

               ESEA

               Building on grants funded by ESSER II State set-aside, and on grants that will be
               funded by ARP ESSER State set-aside, the NJDOE will use funds under Part A of
               Title II of the ESEA to provide professional learning opportunities for educators
               regarding digital literacy. This professional learning will be designed to help
               educators and school leaders make student data easier to understand for students,
               parents and families. The professional supports would directly help districts that
               choose to utilize their ESSER II funds to provide professional learning on data
               literacy, growth mindset, and student, parent and educator professional learning.
               Title II-A funds also supported recent NJDOE efforts to collaborate with
               educators to develop ELA and math instructional units, to help educators better

3
  Please note that the needs of students experiencing homelessness must be addressed (along with the
other groups disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic) through the use of the ARP
ESSER SEA reservations and the required LEA reservation for the academic impact of lost instructional
time; the funding provided to support the needs of students experiencing homelessness by section
2001(b)(1) of the ARP Act is in addition to the supports and services provided with ARP ESSER funds.
                                                                                                    28
understand the ELA and math New Jersey Student Learning Standards. The
products of that work, as well as the partnerships developed with key teacher
leaders, will serve as the base to provide more professional learning around ways
to accelerate learning in math, ELA and science. Additionally, in the coming
year, Title II-A funds will be utilized to create educator “toolkits” for NJDOE’s
recently update academic standards. These resources will be created by educators
across various content areas to help educators make interdisciplinary connections
and provide authentic, project-based lesson examples that connect the various
content areas into one lesson or unit.

The NJDOE will also coordinate funds under the ESEA’s Title IV, Part A,
Student Support and Academic Enrichment Program with ESSER-supported
activities by exploring student-centered learning acceleration activities in STEM
and the arts to help educators and school leaders ensure instructional emphasis on
this interdisciplinary instructional approach.

In these ways, ESEA funds will work in tandem with ESSER funds to help level
the playing field between educators and families so students, families and
educators can better collaborate and partner to support a students’ growth mindset
and agency and to find ways to personalize and target each student’s individual
instructional needs.

IDEA

The NJDOE has leveraged IDEA funding to continue its support of students with
disabilities, educators and families throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. The
NJDOE collaborated closely with its contracted state university partners,
Montclair State University, Rutgers University, and Rowan University to support
professional learning and instructional delivery statewide. The work focused on
the redesign and reimagination of professional development, technical assistance,
and resource development to facilitate the inclusion of students with disabilities in
remote instruction environments (via the NJ Inclusive Education Technical
Assistance Project); student engagement in remote and hybrid instructional
settings utilizing NJ Positive Behavior Support in Schools (NJPBSIS); and
support for our most severely disabled students and the educators who work with
them to provide remote Community-Based Instruction (CBI) resources during
community restrictions. In addition, specialists and consultants at New Jersey’s
Learning Resource Center Network continue to provide webinars, workshops and
technical assistance to LEAs and families of students with disabilities.

Perkins

NJDOE’s use of Perkins funds complements academic enrichment efforts funded
by ESSER by, for example, supporting grant opportunities for LEAs to enhance
career awareness in middle grades, supply chain management summer courses for
students, and training for coordinators of CTE programs.

                                                                                  29
               ARP-Homeless Children and Youth Fund

               New Jersey received approximately $4.5 million in ARP Homeless I Funds. In
               accordance with the legislation and with USED’s April 22, 2021 correspondence,
               the NJDOE is considering using the funds to conduct a Statewide Comprehensive
               Needs Assessment; provide training for regional coordinators and LEA Homeless
               liaisons; build SEA capacity to track/monitor and provide technical assistance to
               LEAs to ensure identification of historically underserved populations such as rural
               children and youth, tribal children and youth, students of color, children and
               youth with disabilities, English learners, LGBTQ+ youth, and pregnant, or
               caregiving students experiencing homelessness; and increase awards to existing
               McKinney-Vento grantees.

               [end response]

D. Maximizing State-Level Funds to Support Students

The Department recognizes that States have an extraordinary opportunity to address the
disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on underserved students through the ARP
Act’s required State set-asides to address the academic impact of lost instructional time, provide
summer learning and enrichment programs, and provide comprehensive afterschool programs. In
this section, SEAs will describe their evidence-based strategies for these resources.

           1. Academic Impact of Lost Instructional Time

               Describe how the SEA will use the funds it reserves under section 2001(f)(1) of
               the ARP Act (totaling not less than 5 percent of the State’s total allocation of ARP
               ESSER funds) on evidence-based interventions to address the academic impact of
               lost instructional time by supporting the implementation of evidence-based
               interventions, such as summer learning or summer enrichment, extended day,
               comprehensive afterschool programs, or extended school year programs, and
               ensure that such interventions respond to students’ academic, social, emotional,
               and mental health needs. The description must include:
                      i. A description of the evidence-based interventions (e.g., providing
                         intensive or high-dosage tutoring, accelerating learning) the SEA has
                         selected, and the extent to which the SEA will evaluate the impact of
                         those interventions on an ongoing basis to understand if they are
                         working;
                      ii. How the evidence-based interventions will specifically address the
                          disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on certain groups of students,
                          including each of the student groups listed in question A.3.i.-viii.
                          When possible, please indicate which data sources the SEA will use to
                          determine the impact of lost instructional time; and
                      iii. The extent to which the SEA will use funds it reserves to identify and
                           engage 1) students who have missed the most in-person instruction

                                                                                                30
           during the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years; and 2) students
           who did not consistently participate in remote instruction when offered
           during school building closures.

[begin response]

The NJDOE will use the funds it reserves under section 2001(f)(1) (totaling 5% of
the State’s total allocation of ARP ESSER funds) to establish an “Acceleration
Coach and Educator Support” formula grant for LEAs. LEAs will use these grant
funds to implement professional learning for educators and other school staff in
skills and topics that will empower them to better meet the needs of their students.
Permitted topics of professional learning might include, but are not limited to:

   •   Support of Intervention and Referral Services and Multi-Tiered Systems
       of Supports and Response to Intervention, that expand the LEA’s capacity
       to stand up effective, high-quality learning acceleration activities
       supported by the Learning Acceleration grant that NJDOE made available
       in March 2021;
   •   Development of positive school climates that promote the social,
       emotional, and well-being of students using universal tier I supports,
       strategies, and interventions;
   •   Implementation of social and emotional learning in classroom, schools,
       and communities;
   •   Culturally responsive teaching practices that acknowledge and affirm
       students’ cultural identities and expand educators’ understanding of the
       relationship between a student’s cultural background and their academic,
       social, and emotional needs.
   •   Digital literacy and equitable access to high quality curriculum and
       instructional technology with a focus on understanding how access differs
       for students of poverty, of color, with special needs, and English learners;
   •   Use of local and state assessment data to improve instruction;
   •   Engaging educators and parents in the community to prioritize standards,
       providing scaffolding and personalized supports through extended
       learning and ensuring equitable access to grade level standards;
   •   Identifying the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on different student
       subgroups and based on differing levels of access to in-person learning
       since March 2020; and
   •   Other professional learning that will empower educators to better meet the
       needs of their students.

Acceleration Coach and Educator Support grants will allow LEAs to provide
professional learning opportunities to a variety of school staff, including
educators and key support staff (e.g. school counselors, special education
                                                                                 31
   personnel, nurses, social workers, and psychologists) on topics tailored to the
   unique academic as well as social, emotional, and mental health needs of their
   students.

   Additionally, the NJDOE will use these funds to support the costs of assessments
   designed to measure student readiness to engage with grade-level learning,
   including the Start Strong assessments and a Kindergarten Readiness Assessment.
   These assessments are important tools in the State and LEA’s approach to
   developing evidence-based interventions to address the academic impact of lost
   instructional time. As outlined in section A.3, various data on the academic,
   social, emotional, and mental health needs of students will be available to NJDOE
   to help continuously evaluate the State’s educational needs.

   [end response]

2. Evidence-Based Summer Learning and Enrichment Programs

   Describe how the SEA will use the funds it reserves under section 2001(f)(2) of
   the ARP Act (totaling not less than 1 percent of the State’s total allocation of ARP
   ESSER funds) for evidence-based summer learning and enrichment programs,
   including those that begin in Summer 2021, and ensure such programs respond to
   students’ academic, social, emotional, and mental health needs. The description
   must include:

      i. A description of the evidence-based programs that address the academic,
         social, emotional, and mental health needs of students (e.g., providing
         intensive or high-dosage tutoring, accelerating learning) the SEA has
         selected, and the extent to which the SEA will evaluate the impact of those
         programs;
      ii. How the evidence-based programs will specifically address the
          disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on certain groups of students,
          including each of the student groups listed in question A.3. i.–viii. When
          possible, please indicate which data sources the SEA will use to identify
          students most in need of summer learning and enrichment programs; and
      iii. The extent to which the SEA will use funds it reserves to identify and
           engage 1) students who have missed the most in-person instruction during
           the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years; and 2) students who did not
           consistently participate in remote instruction when offered during school
           building closures.
   [begin response]

   The NJDOE will use the funds it reserves under section 2001(f)(2) (totaling not
   less than 1 percent of the State’s total allocation of ARP ESSER funds) to
   establish a Summer Enrichment Activities formula grant to LEAs. These grants
                                                                                     32
   will support research-based academic enrichment activities such as summer
   learning academies and 1:1 tutoring, as well as summer activities that support the
   broader learning ecosystem of students, staff, and families, such as providing time
   for re-socialization and developing social emotional skills and growth mindsets
   in students, professional learning for educators regarding the use of universal
   screening assessments, and education and training programs for parents and
   caregivers. LEAs will be required to target funds to content areas that have been
   most impacted by the disruptions of COVID-19 at that LEA, (e.g. STEM, younger
   grades, or visual and performing arts).

   [end response]

3. Evidence-Based Comprehensive Afterschool Programs

   Describe how the SEA will use the funds it reserves under section 2001(f)(3) of
   the ARP Act (totaling not less than 1 percent of the State’s total allocation of ARP
   ESSER funds) for evidence-based comprehensive afterschool programs
   (including, for example, before-school programming), and ensure such programs
   respond to students’ academic, social, emotional, and mental health needs. The
   description must include:
       i. A description of the evidence-based programs (e.g., including
          partnerships with community-based organizations) the SEA has selected,
          and the extent to which the SEA will evaluate the impact of those
          programs;
       ii. How the evidence-based programs will specifically address the
           disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on certain groups of students,
           including each of the student groups listed in question A.3.i.-viii. When
           possible, please indicate which data sources the SEA will use to identify
           students most in need of comprehensive afterschool programming; and
       iii. the extent to which the SEA will use funds it reserves to identify and
            engage 1) students who have missed the most in-person instruction during
            the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years; and 2) students who did not
            consistently participate in remote instruction when offered during school
            building closures.

   [begin response]

   The NJDOE will use the funds it reserves under section 2001(f)(3) (totaling not
   less than 1 percent of the State’s total allocation of ARP ESSER funds) to
   establish a Comprehensive Beyond the School Day Activities formula grant to
   LEAs. These grants will support research-based academic enrichment activities
   during out-of-school time (e.g. before-school, after-school, weekends, and holiday
   breaks) such as 1:1 tutoring, as well as activities that support the broader learning
   ecosystem of students, staff, and families, such as providing time for re-
                                                                                       33
  socialization and developing social emotional skills and growth mindsets in
  students, professional learning for educators in the use of universal screening
  assessments, and education and training programs for parents and caregivers.
  LEAs will be required to target funds to content areas that have been most
  impacted by the disruptions of COVID-19 at that LEA (e.g. STEM, younger
  grades, or visual and performing arts).

  [end response]

4. Emergency Needs

  If the SEA plans to reserve funds for emergency needs under section 2001(f)(4) of
  the ARP Act to address issues responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, describe
  the anticipated use of those funds, including the extent to which these funds will
  build SEA and LEA capacity to ensure students’ and staff’s health and safety; to
  meet students’ academic, social, emotional, and mental health needs; and to use
  ARP ESSER funds to implement evidence-based interventions.

  [begin response]

  The NJDOE will use funds reserved under section 2001(f)(4) for the following
  activities:

  Grants for Otherwise Unfunded Entities

  As the NJDOE did with its ESSER I and ESSER II state set-aside, make ARP
  ESSER grants available to educational entities that did not receive funds under
  Title I, Part A of the ESEA in FY2020 (e.g. non-Title I LEAs, State Agencies, and
  public receiving schools).

  MTSS Staff Grants to LEAs

  Establish a formula grant to LEAs to support hiring staff or contracting with
  service providers to develop and implement Tier II (targeted, small group
  interventions) and Tier III (intensive interventions) services in accordance with a
  multi-tiered systems of supports framework that addresses students’ and
  educators’ mental health and social emotional needs. LEAs may also use MTSS
  Staff grants to provide professional learning in effective implementation of Tier II
  and Tier III services.

  Support for High Quality Learning Management Systems

  The NJDOE is also considering using these funds to support LEAs in the
  implementation of high-quality learning management systems that include
  benchmark and interim assessment data. More widespread adoption of such
  systems across the State will not only will not only build collective assessment
  literacy among stakeholders to inform education-related decisions around
                                                                                     34
              accelerated learning, but will also improve the NJDOE’s access to comparable,
              meaningful student performance data that may assist with identifying student
              groups or content areas most in need of additional supports.

              The proposals detailed throughout Section D. of this State Plan are based on
              NJDOE’s assessment of the most effective use of State-level funds as of the
              drafting of this plan. The NJDOE recognizes, however, that it must continue to
              evaluate the State’s ever-evolving educational needs, and consistent with U.S.
              Department of Education guidance retains the flexibility to adjust its use of funds
              accordingly. To that end, these proposals are subject to revision as circumstances
              change, new health guidance is released, and additional information becomes
              available regarding the academic, social, emotional, and mental health needs of
              New Jersey students and educators. The NJDOE will continue to ensure that,
              within the relevant federal requirements, activities funded by State-level ARP
              ESSER funds are aligned to the State’s current needs and circumstances.

              [end response]

E. Supporting LEAs in Planning for and Meeting Students’ Needs

The Department recognizes that the safe return to in-person instruction must be accompanied by
a focus on meeting students’ academic, social, emotional, and mental health needs, and by
addressing the opportunity gaps that existed before – and were exacerbated by – the pandemic. In
this section, SEAs will describe how they will support their LEAs in developing high-quality
plans for LEAs’ use of ARP ESSER funds to achieve these objectives.

           1. LEA Plans for the Use of ARP ESSER Funds

              Describe what the SEA will require its LEAs to include in LEA plans consistent
              with the ARP ESSER requirements for the use of ARP ESSER funds, how the
              SEA will require such plans to be made available to the public, and the deadline
              by which the LEA must submit its ARP ESSER plan (which must be a reasonable
              timeline and should be within no later than 90 days after receiving its ARP
              ESSER allocation). The LEA plans must include, at a minimum:

              i. The extent to which and how the funds will be used to implement prevention
                 and mitigation strategies that are, to the greatest extent practicable, in line
                 with the most recent CDC guidance, in order to continuously and safely
                 operate schools for in-person learning;
              ii. How the LEA will use the funds it reserves under section 2001(e)(1) of the
                  ARP Act (totaling not less than 20 percent of the LEA’s total allocation of
                  ARP ESSER funds) to address the academic impact of lost instructional time
                  through the implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as summer
                  learning or summer enrichment, extended day, comprehensive afterschool
                  programs, or extended school year programs;
                                                                                               35
   iii. How the LEA will spend its remaining ARP ESSER funds consistent with
        section 2001(e)(2) of the ARP Act; and
   iv. How the LEA will ensure that the interventions it implements, including but
       not limited to the interventions under section 2001(e)(1) of the ARP Act to
       address the academic impact of lost instructional time, will respond to the
       academic, social, emotional, and mental health needs of all students, and
       particularly those students disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19
       pandemic, including students from low-income families, students of color,
       English learners, children with disabilities, students experiencing
       homelessness, children and youth in foster care, and migratory students.

   [begin response]

   The NJDOE will require that, within a reasonable timeframe of the NJDOE
   making ARP ESSER applications available to LEAs, each LEA submit its plan
   for the use of ARP ESSER Funds to the NJDOE. To ensure that each such plan
   meets the minimum statutory requirements and the requirements described in this
   question, the NJDOE will provide a template that incorporates all required
   information, including LEA consultation requirements.

   [end response]

2. LEA Consultation

   Describe how the SEA will, in planning for the use of ARP ESSER funds, ensure
   that, consistent with the ARP ESSER requirements], its LEAs engage in
   meaningful consultation with stakeholders, including, but not limited to:
       i. students;
       ii. families;
       iii. school and district administrators (including special education
            administrators); and
       iv. teachers, principals, school leaders, other educators, school staff, and
           their unions.

   The LEA must also engage in meaningful consultation with each of the following
   to the extent present in or served by the LEA:
       i. Tribes;
       ii. civil rights organizations (including disability rights organizations); and
       iii. stakeholders representing the interests of children with disabilities,
            English learners, children experiencing homelessness, children and youth

                                                                                      36
             in foster care, migratory students, children who are incarcerated, and
             other underserved students.

   The description must also include how the SEA will ensure that LEAs provide the
   public the opportunity to provide input in the development of the LEA’s plan for
   the use of ARP ESSER funds and take such input into account.

   [begin response]

   See response to question E.1 above.

   [end response]

3. Describe how the SEA will support and monitor its LEAs in using ARP ESSER
   funds.

   The description must include:
     i.   How the SEA will support and monitor its LEAs’ implementation of
          evidence-based interventions that respond to students’ academic, social,
          emotional, and mental health needs, such as through summer learning or
          summer enrichment, extended day, comprehensive afterschool programs,
          or extended school year programs – including the extent to which the
          SEA will collect evidence of the effectiveness of interventions employed;

      ii.    How the SEA will support and monitor its LEAs in specifically
             addressing the disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on
             certain groups of students, including each of the student groups listed in
             question A.3.i.-viii; and

      iii.   How the SEA will support and monitor its LEAs in using ARP ESSER
             funds to identify, reengage, and support students most likely to have
             experienced the impact of lost instructional time on student learning, such
             as:
             a. Students who have missed the most in-person instruction during the
                2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years;
             b. Students who did not consistently participate in remote instruction
                when offered during school building closures; and
             c. Students most at-risk of dropping out of school.
   [begin response]

   ARP ESSER funds will be monitored as part of the NJDOE Collaborative
   Monitoring process. The NJDOE utilizes a Subrecipient Risk Assessment Tool
   which is designed to meet the requirements set forth in 2 CFR § 200.331 for pass-
                                                                                      37
     through entities of federal grant awards. Specifically, the tool determines the
     LEA’s risk of noncompliance with the terms and conditions of the federal award,
     and the level of support the LEA will receive through monitoring activities
     conducted by the State. In the current NJDOE process, all LEAs are ranked
     according to a weighted and scaled score for each indicator. LEAs then are placed
     into one of three “tiers” which determines their level of support. LEAs that are
     placed in the “intensive tier” participate in the onsite collaborative monitoring
     process. LEAs placed in the “targeted support” tier will undergo a desk
     monitoring for the ESSER funds, as well as fiscal desk audits and targeted data
     reviews. A specific desk monitoring protocol will be used to supplement the
     existing desk monitoring protocols. The remaining LEAs are placed in the
     “universal support” tier, which includes supports provided to all LEAs such as
     webinars, guidance documents, training, and technical assistance.

     The NJDOE revises its Risk Assessment Tool on an annual basis, and for the
     2021-2022 school year, an interdepartmental working group will be convened to
     review and update the tool as necessary. For the 2021-2022 school year, the tool
     will be revised to include indicators relevant to LEAs’ use of ARP ESSER funds.

     In addition to revising the Risk Assessment Tool, the NJDOE will update the
     monitoring protocols to ensure the SEA is monitoring LEA implementation of:
        •   evidence-based interventions that respond to students’ academic, social,
            emotional, and mental health needs, such as through summer learning or
            summer enrichment, extended day, comprehensive afterschool programs,
            or extended school year programs;
        •   interventions employed to specifically address the disproportionate impact
            of the COVID-19 pandemic on certain groups of students, including each
            of the student groups listed in question A.3.i.–viii; and
        •   how the LEA used ARP ESSER funds to identify, reengage, and support
            students most likely to have experienced the impact of lost instructional
            time on student learning, such as:
                o Students who have missed the most in-person instruction during
                  the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 school years;
                o Students who did not consistently participate in remote instruction
                  when offered during school building closures; and
                o Students most at-risk of dropping out of school.

     [end response]

4.      Describe the extent to which the SEA will support its LEAs in implementing
        additional strategies for taking educational equity into account in expending
        ARP ESSER funds, including but not limited to:
         i. Allocating funding both to schools and for districtwide activities based on
            student need, and
                                                                                     38
    ii. Implementing an equitable and inclusive return to in-person instruction.
        An inclusive return to in-person instruction includes, but is not limited to,
        establishing policies and practices that avoid the over-use of exclusionary
        discipline measures (including in- and out-of-school suspensions) and
        creating a positive and supportive learning environment for all students.

[begin response]

The NJDOE will provide guidance and technical assistance on the use of ESSER
funds that highlights how allowable activities may be used to advance educational
equity. As part of their application, LEAs will be required to provide information
on their plans to use ARP ESSER funds to implement an equitable and inclusive
return to in-person instruction.

[end response]




                                                                                  39
F. Supporting the Educator Workforce

The Department recognizes the toll that the COVID-19 pandemic has taken on the Nation’s
educators as well as students. In this section, SEAs will describe strategies for supporting and
stabilizing the educator workforce and for making staffing decisions that will support students’
academic, social, emotional, and mental health needs.

             1. Supporting and Stabilizing the Educator Workforce

                i. Describe the extent to which the State is facing shortages of educators,
                   education administration personnel, and other school personnel involved in
                   safely reopening schools, and the extent to which they vary by region/type of
                   school district and/or groups of educators (e.g., special educators and related
                   services personnel and paraprofessionals; bilingual or English as a second
                   language educators; science, technology, engineering, and math (“STEM”)
                   educators; career and technical education (“CTE”) educators; early childhood
                   educators). Cite specific data on shortages and needs where available.

                [begin response]

                The NJDOE 2021-2022 Teacher Shortage Area report submitted to the U.S.
                Department of Education designated the following subject matters as teacher
                shortage areas:
                   •       English as a Second Language—Bilingual Education discipline;
                   •       English as a Second Language—English as a Second Language discipline;
                   •       World Languages;
                   •       Mathematics;
                   •       Science;
                   •       Special Education; and
                   •       Career and Technical Education.

              The "Educator Workforce Data" table below displays the number of FTEs in each
              of these subject areas employed in NJ public schools in the 2019-2020 school year.

Educator Workforce Data
 Area           Data on shortages and needs
 Bilingual             •    Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas, 1,840;
 educators             •    Percent of Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas,
                            1.55%;
                       •    Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 82;
                       •    Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 0.07%
Area            Data on shortages and needs
Special         •   Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas, 23,041;
Education       •   Percent of Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas,
                    19.37%;
                •   Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 455;
                •   Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 0.38%
World           •   Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas, 4,764;
Languages       •   Percent of Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas,
                    4.00%;
                •   Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 154
English as a    •   Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas, 2,318;
second          •   Percent of Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas,
language            1.95%;
educators       •   Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 40;
                •   Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 0.03%
Math            •   Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas, 10,039;
                •   Percent of Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas,
                    8.44%;
                •   Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 236;
                •   Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 0.20%
Science         •   Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas, 7,250;
                •   Percent of Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas,
                    6.09%;
                •   Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 177;
                •   Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 0.15%
CTE educators   •   Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas, 2,202;
                •   Percent of Unduplicated Total FTE Teachers in all Certification Areas,
                    1.85%;
                •   Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 363;
                •   Unduplicated Total Out of Field Teachers, 0.31%
Early           As indicated in the NJDOE’s Teacher Shortage Area report submitted to
Childhood       USED, the NJDOE has not determined early childhood to be a teacher
educators       shortage area. Of the 346 traditional route candidates prepared in the 15-16
                school year by New Jersey Educator Preparation Programs, 189 (54.6%) of
                them were hired. This is consistent with data from years prior.




                                                                                             41
Additionally, the "Student to Staff Ratios" table below shows ratios of students and staff
members in the State for the 2019-2020 school year:

Student to Staff Ratios
 Ratio                                           State Ratio
 Students to Teachers                            12:1
 Students to Administrators                      148:1
 Teachers to Administrators                      12:1
 Students to Librarians/Media Specialists        1113:1
 Students to Nurses                              519:1
 Students to Counselors                          351:1
 Students to Child Study Team Members            240:1

[end response]

          ii. Describe how the SEA will assist its LEAs in identifying the most urgent areas of
              shortages or potential shortages, with particular plans for individual LEAs facing
              the most significant needs (e.g., by avoiding layoffs, providing high-quality
              professional learning opportunities, and addressing the impact of stress or trauma
              on educators). Include a description of how other Federal COVID-19 funding (e.g.,
              ESSER and GEER funds under the CARES Act and CRRSA Act) have already
              been used to avoid layoffs during the COVID-19 pandemic.

                 [begin response]

                 The NJDOE has used and will continue to use federal funds to support a variety
                 of initiatives for meeting LEA staffing needs:

                    •   As detailed in question D.1.iii, the NJDOE will use the funds it reserves
                        under section 2001(f)(1) (totaling 5% of the State’s total allocation of
                        ARP ESSER funds) to establish a grant for LEAs to support high-quality
                        professional learning opportunities. These opportunities may cover a range
                        of topics that will empower educators to better meet the academic and
                        social emotional needs of their students.

                    •   The NJDOE also designated $30 million from its ESSER II State set-aside
                        for the provision of mental health services and supports for students and
                        educators, including through contracted service providers to support LEA
                        students and staff, as outlined in question A.1.

                    •   The NJDOE allocated $100 million from the Coronavirus Relief Fund to
                        assist LEAs with defraying costs associated with reopening schools for the
                        2020-2021 school year, including payroll and benefit costs of those

                                                                                                  42
            employees whose services are substantially dedicated to mitigating or
            responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency.

    [end response]

iii. Describe the actions the SEA will take to fill anticipated gaps in certified teachers
     for the start of the 2021-2022 school year and to what extent the SEA will further
     support its LEAs in expanding the educator pipeline and educator diversity while
     addressing the immediate needs of students disproportionately impacted by the
     pandemic (e.g., recruiting teaching candidates to provide high-dosage tutoring or
     implementing residencies for teacher candidates).

    [begin response]

    The NJDOE has taken several actions to help fill staffing shortages throughout the
    2020-2021 school year, and will continue to evaluate whether it will be possible
    and beneficial to extend these flexibilities into 2021-2022:
        •   Temporarily extended the number of days that certificated individuals
            serving in an instructional area outside of their credentials may fill vacant
            teaching positions;
        •   Temporarily extended the time limitation in which a substitute non-
            instructional school nurse can serve in a single position within a single
            district;
        •   Recognizing that teacher candidates had inequitable test access and/or
            fewer opportunities to test due to COVID-19, authorized the issuance of
            temporary initial certifications to teacher candidates who were unable to
            take the assessments required for certification; and
        •   Provided temporary flexibility for teacher candidates who were not able to
            complete the NJDOE’s required performance assessment in the usual
            manner with national scoring.

    Additionally, in May 2021 Governor Murphy signed legislation designed to help
    alleviate staffing shortages by reducing the number of semester-hour credits
    required to receive a substitute credential for certain candidates applying for the
    credential between May 11, 2021 and June 30, 2023. Pursuant to that legislation,
    the NJDOE will examine issues and develop recommendations as to whether that
    application window should be extended.

    Building on robust and longstanding efforts to diversify the educator workforce,
    this year:
        •   In the 2020-2021 school year, the NJDOE made $750,000 in state grant
            funding available to eligible entities to recruit, train, and place new
            teachers, with special emphasis on minority teachers;

                                                                                        43
      •   Governor Murphy’s proposed FY22 budget includes $750,000 for
          Minority Teacher Development Grants and $550,000 to encourage
          retention and diversification within the teaching profession.

   [end response]

2. Staffing to Support Student Needs

   Describe the extent to which the SEA has developed or will develop strategies
   and will support its LEAs in increasing student access to key support staff within
   school buildings, including school counselors, special education personnel,
   nurses, social workers, and psychologists (e.g. hiring additional personnel or
   freeing up these staff to focus on providing services to students).

   [begin response]

   The NJDOE has developed and will continue to develop a number of strategies to
   support LEAs in increasing access to student support staff.

   ESSER II State Set-Aside Mental Health Grant

   The NJDOE designated $30 million from the State set-aside for grants to LEAs to
   provide mental health services and supports for students and educators. Among
   the allowable uses of these grant funds was contracting with community-based
   providers to increase LEA capacity to provide mental health services and supports
   based on student and staff needs.

   ARP ESSER Sate Set-Aside

   The NJDOE will use a portion of its ARP ESSER State set-aside to establish a
   grant to LEAs to support the hiring of staff to develop and implement Tier II and
   Tier III services in accordance with an MTSS framework that address students’
   and educators’ mental health and social emotional needs.

   Nursing Service Limitation Flexibility

   The NJDOE temporarily modified its regulations to extend, for the 2020-2021
   school year, the time limitation in which a substitute non-instructional school
   nurse can serve in a single position within a single district.

   Clayton Model MOU

   As part of the State set-aside from the CARES Act ESSER funds, the NJDOE
   entered into an MOU with Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey its Senator
   Walter Rand Institute for Public Affairs (WRI) for expansion of The Clayton
   Model, a universal, school-based social emotional learning (SEL) program that
                                                                                     44
serves all students within the school. The Clayton Model uses two educational
strategies that help to enhance positive youth development and academic
achievement. The first strategy teaches students about processing, integrating, and
selectively applying social and emotional skills. Social and emotional skills
include identifying emotions from social cues, goal-setting, conflict resolution,
and decision-making. Students are taught to apply these skills in developmentally,
contextually, and culturally appropriate ways. Students also learn to apply SEL
skills in order to prevent the occurrence of specific problem behaviors, such as
interpersonal violence, bullying, and school failure. The second strategy involves
fostering students’ social–emotional development by creating safe and caring
learning environments using tiered supports that incorporate peer and family
activities, improved classroom management and teaching practices, and whole-
school community-building activities. Safe and supportive school communities
allow students to feel valued, experience a greater motivation to achieve, and
develop a set of social–emotional competencies in a supportive setting that can
lead to positive outcomes.

Collaborators in this work will build capacity to train SEL coordinators and
specialists, ensure this shared services model is implemented with fidelity, and
identify systemic and structural challenges when implementing the Clayton
Model in new sites. Funding will also be used to build the capacity of
collaborating organizations to expand the Clayton Model.

Trauma Informed Training MOA

In addition, the State used $1.1 million in CARES Act ESSER Funds to enter into
a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the New Jersey Department of
Children and Families (NJDCF) to provide trauma informed training for school
districts using several approaches in a program called “Developing Resiliency
with Engaging Approaches to Maximize Success (DREAMS).” Educators and
providers throughout New Jersey have noted that, due to the pandemic, families
are identifying challenges in managing anxiety, fear, and/or stress. Those
challenges affect their ability to help their youth manage their own feelings of
anxiety, fear, and lack of connectedness. Stakeholders identify these challenges as
a high priority need, exacerbated by social distancing and reduced access to
mental/behavioral and substance use disorder supports for youth and families.
This funding opportunity will provide access to new and innovative approaches
for educators to support youth and families during the public health crisis and in
the aftermath to help youth through the recovery and resiliency process.
DREAMS will promote healthy and healing school environments by reducing
restraints and disciplinary actions and providing teachers with resources and
support to ensure job satisfaction and classrooms that are conducive for
youth/student learning.




                                                                                   45
              Comprehensive Mental Health and SEL Guidance

              To support the social and emotional competencies of educators, the NJDOE
              developed a series of professional learning modules on social and emotional
              learning (SEL). Module 1 provides participants with an overview of SEL.
              Modules 2–6 provide a deeper understanding of each SEL competency: self-
              awareness, self-management, social awareness, responsible decision-making, and
              relationship skills. The modules provide LEAs with all materials necessary to
              conduct professional development sessions and facilitate professional learning
              communities.

              As part of the NJDOE’s ongoing efforts to support LEAs in addressing mental
              health concerns, the NJDOE, as part of its interagency Mental Health Working
              Group, partnered with Northeast and Caribbean Mental Health Technology
              Transfer Center to develop a school mental health resource guide. The resource
              guide focuses on the practical application of implementing a comprehensive
              school-based mental health framework. In addition, through this partnership, the
              NJDOE will provide three regional meetings with LEAs during the summer of
              2021 which will provide an overview of comprehensive school mental health
              services, strategies for identifying needs, and ideas for how to target funds to
              specific tiers and gaps in existing services. The regional meetings will be
              followed by a series of webinars in the fall. The NJDOE will also provide
              opportunities for LEAs to apply for and receive individual district coaching
              sessions. Individual coaching sessions are designed to provide more intensive
              supports to district level teams on an as needed basis. These sessions will be
              available to all schools and districts on a first come first serve basis.

              [end response]

G. Monitoring and Measuring Progress

The Department recognizes that transparency on how ARP ESSER funds are used and their
impact on the Nation’s education system is a fundamental responsibility of Federal, State, and
local government. In this section, SEAs will describe how they are building capacity at the SEA
and LEA levels to ensure high-quality data collection and reporting and to safeguard funds for
their intended purposes.

           1. Capacity for Data Collection and Reporting

              It is important for an SEA to continuously monitor progress and make
              adjustments to its strategies, as well as to support its LEAs in making adjustments
              to LEA strategies, based on impact. Describe how the SEA will ensure its
              capacity and the capacity of its LEAs to collect data on reporting requirements,
              including but not limited to the examples of reporting requirements described in
              the SEA’s Grant Award Notification (listed in Appendix B). Describe the SEA’s
              capacity and strategy to collect data from its LEAs (disaggregated by student
              group, where applicable), to the greatest extent practicable, including any steps
                                                                                                46
the SEA will take to build its capacity in the future (which may include the use of
ARP ESSER and other Federal COVID-19 pandemic funds at the SEA and LEA
levels), on issues that may include the following:

i. Student learning, including the academic impact of lost instructional time
   during the COVID-19 pandemic;
ii. Opportunity to learn measures (e.g., chronic absenteeism; student
    engagement; use of exclusionary discipline; access to and participation in
    advanced coursework; access to technology, including educator access to
    professional development on the effective use of technology; access to high-
    quality educators; access to school counselors, social workers, nurses, and
    school psychologists; and results from student, parent, and/or educator
    surveys);
iii. Fiscal data that is comparable across the State (e.g., per-pupil expenditures at
     the LEA and school levels);
iv. Jobs created and retained (by position type);
v. Participation in programs funded by ARP ESSER resources (e.g., summer and
   afterschool programs); and
vi. Other reporting requirements reasonably required by the Secretary (please
    refer to Appendix B of this template; final requirements will be issued
    separately).

[begin response]

The NJDOE collects nearly all of the elements described in G.1.i-vi above
through existing, ongoing data collections. Relevant data elements collected by
NJDOE include:
   •   Student attendance;
   •   Use of exclusionary discipline;
   •   Access to and participation in advanced coursework;
   •   Student access to technology;
   •   Access to high-quality educators;
   •   Access to school counselors, nurses, and other support staff; and
   •   Fiscal data that is comparable across the state, including per-pupil
       expenditures.

In addition to the data elements identified above, the NJDOE developed a CARES
Act Performance Report which collected LEA data on ESSER fund expenditures.

                                                                                    47
onsite monitoring in the last two years or are scheduled to undergo monitoring via
the NJDOE’s district accountability system in the current year. LEAs with the
next highest Aggregate Risk Scores based on all applicable Risk Indicators are
placed in the Targeted Support Tier. All other LEAs are placed in the Universal
Support Tier.

The 2020-2021 Risk Assessment Tool included 12 Risk Indictors. Each indicator
has between two and seven categories for evaluating the risk level of LEA
performance. Higher numbered categories are associated with higher risk levels.
Indicators 1 through 3 are related to academic performance; the highest possible
risk level is 5 for these indicators. Indicators 4 through 12 focus on fiscal
performance. The highest possible risk level for each fiscal-related indicator is 10.
LEAs receive an Assessed Risk Level on each applicable Risk Indicator. Some
LEAs are not assessed on all risk indicators. For example, LEAs serving grades
K-8 are not assessed on Indicator 3, four- and five-year graduation rates. When an
LEA cannot be assessed on an indicator, the highest possible risk level for that
indicator is zero. To be placed in the Intensive or Targeted Support Tiers, LEAs
must be assessed on eight or more indicators.

With regard to internal controls, the NJDOE first identifies a Grantee’s risks, such
as possible misuse of funds by the subrecipients, lack of required documentation
to support costs, lack of LEA internal controls, and lack of NJDOE capacity to
complete subrecipient monitoring and application review. The NJDOE has
identified solutions for mitigating the identified risks: All LEA applications are
reviewed prior to approval, including a review of required assurances; technical
assistance will be provided to all eligible LEAs; the NJDOE Subrecipient
monitoring plan will include the use of a risk assessment tool designed to identify
the LEAs with the greatest risk. Identified LEAs will be monitored either onsite or
through a desk monitoring. Corrective Action Plans (CAPs) will be developed for
LEAs with monitoring findings. The CAPs may include, among other actions, the
revision of policies/procedures or recovery of funds if appropriate.

Primary Documentation to Prevent Improper Payments

All LEAs are awarded funds via the Electronic Web Enabled Grant System
(EWEG). The list of allowable uses in the application is linked to the budget
detail pages, so LEAs must budget funds for all selected allowable uses. LEA
draw downs of grant funds are approved by the Office of Grants Management
through EWEG. In order to receive funds, an LEA, in the ESSER Application,
must agree to the assurances outlined by USED Guidance. EWEG Internal
controls are built into the ESSER Application to assist LEAs in accurately
completing the budget process. LEAs are required to check one or more of the
allowable uses (provided by USED guidance). For each selected allowable use, a
comment box opens in which the LEA provides an explanation of the identified
need for which funds will be used. The LEA will not be able to move forward
without providing an explanation in the comment box for each selected allowable
use. The allowable uses are linked directly to the budget detail section of the
                                                                                49
ESSER Application. The LEA is required to budget funds for each selected
allowable use. The ESSER Application cannot be submitted for review and
approval until the budget matches all selected allowable uses. Applications are
reviewed and approved by staff in the Office of Grants Management.
Reimbursement requests are reviewed and approved by staff in the Office of
Grants Management.

Oversight Integrity Monitors:

In addition to the process outlined above, NJDOE also will engage the services of
a COVID-19 Oversight Integrity Monitors (“Integrity Monitors”) in relation to
these funds. The purpose of the Integrity Monitors is to identify any fraud, waste
or abuse that maybe occurring with these funds. Integrity Monitors will monitor
between 40 and 60 LEAs receiving ARP ESSER funds based on risk.
Additionally, Integrity Monitors will also be monitoring the SEA funds.

On July 17, 2020, Governor Murphy signed Executive Order 166 (“EO 166”),
which, among other things, established the COVID-19 Compliance and Oversight
Task Force (the “Taskforce”) and the Governor’s Disaster Recovery Office
(GDRO). The purpose of the Taskforce is to advise each principal department and
agency of this State, as well as each independent State authority COVID-19
Recovery Program participant, that receive or administer COVID-19 Recovery
Funds regarding compliance with federal and State law and direction as to how to
mitigate the risks of waste, fraud, and abuse.

Pursuant to EO 166, the Taskforce has issued guidelines regarding the
appointment and responsibilities of Integrity Monitors. State Agencies may retain
and appoint Integrity Monitors to oversee the disbursement of COVID-19
Recovery Funds and the administration of a COVID-19 Recovery Program.
Integrity Monitors are intended to serve as important parts of the State’s
accountability infrastructure while working with NJDOE in developing measures
to prevent, detect, and remediate inefficiency and malfeasance in the expenditure
of COVID-19 Recovery Funds.

EO 166 requires State Agencies to identify an Accountability Officer to serve as
central point of contact for tracking COVID-19 funds within each agency or
authority and is responsible for working with and serving as a direct point of
contact for the GDRO and the Taskforce.

The Integrity Monitors support monitoring and oversight and ensure that NJDOE
administers COVID-19 Recovery Funds in compliance with program, financial,
and administrative requirements set forth in the federal-state grant agreement, the
State-Recovery Program Participant sub-grant agreement, and applicable federal
and state laws, regulations, and guidelines.

[end response]

                                                                                  50
Appendix A: School Operating Status and Instructional Mode Data Template

Indicate the date or time period represented by the following data.

[begin response]

The NJDOE will submit this data to the U.S. Department of Education and post it to the
NJDOE’s website by June 21, 2020.

[end response]

Table 1

In the most recent time period available, how many schools in your State offered each mode of
instruction or learning model described below? Each row should account for all schools in your
State, so that, for each row, the sum of the numbers in the “offered to all students,” “offered to
some students,” and “not offered” columns is equal to the number in the “all schools” column.

Add or change rows as needed

 Number of schools            All schools       Offered to all    Offered to         Not offered
                                                students          some students
 Remote or online only        #                 #                 #                  #

 School buildings open        #                 #                 #                  #
 with both remote/online
 and in-person instruction
 (hybrid)




 School buildings open        #                 #                 #                  #
 with full-time in-person
 instruction




To the extent data are available, please complete the above table for 1) all schools in the State,
and 2) separately for each instructional level (e.g., pre-kindergarten/elementary schools, middle
schools, high schools).




                                                                                                 51
Table 2

In the most recent time period available, what was the enrollment and mode of instruction for the
schools in your State?

Add or change rows as needed

 Number of students         Total              Remote or         Both               Full-time in-
                            enrollment         online only       remote/online      person
                                                                 and in-person      instruction
                                                                 instruction
                                                                 (hybrid)
 Students from low-         #                  #                 #                  #
 income families


 White, not Hispanic        #                  #                 #                  #

 Black or African           #                  #                 #                  #
 American, not Hispanic


 Hispanic, of any race      #                  #                 #                  #

 Asian, not Hispanic        #                  #                 #                  #

 American Indian or         #                  #                 #                  #
 Alaskan Native, not
 Hispanic


 Native Hawaiian or         #                  #                 #                  #
 Pacific Islander, not
 Hispanic


 Two or more races, not     #                  #                 #                  #
 Hispanic

 Race/Ethnicity             #                  #                 #                  #
 information not
 available
                                                                                              52
Number of students      Total        Remote or     Both            Full-time in-
                        enrollment   online only   remote/online   person
                                                   and in-person   instruction
                                                   instruction
                                                   (hybrid)
English learners        #            #             #               #

Children with           #            #             #               #
disabilities

Students experiencing   #            #             #               #
homelessness


Children and youth in   #            #             #               #
foster care

Migratory students      #            #             #               #




                                                                             53
Appendix B: Reporting Language Included in the Grant Award Notification (“GAN”)

As described in the Grant Award Notification (“GAN”), the SEA will comply with, and ensure
that its LEAs comply with, all reporting requirements at such time and in such manner and
containing such information as the Secretary may reasonably require, including on matters such
as:
   •   How the State is developing strategies and implementing public health protocols
       including, to the greatest extent practicable, policies and plans in line with the CDC
       guidance related to mitigating COVID-19 in schools;
   •   Overall plans and policies related to State support for return to in-person instruction and
       maximizing in-person instruction time, including how funds will support a return to and
       maximize in-person instruction time, and advance equity and inclusivity in participation
       in in-person instruction;
   •   Data on each school’s mode of instruction (fully in-person, hybrid, and fully remote) and
       conditions;
   •   SEA and LEA uses of funds to meet students’ social, emotional, and academic needs,
       including through summer enrichment programming and other evidence-based
       interventions, and how they advance equity for underserved students;
   •   SEA and LEA uses of funds to sustain and support access to early childhood education
       programs;
   •   Impacts and outcomes (disaggregated by student subgroup) through use of ARP ESSER
       funding (e.g., quantitative and qualitative results of ARP ESSER funding, including on
       personnel, student learning, and budgeting at the school and district level);
   •   Student data (disaggregated by student subgroup) related to how the COVID-19
       pandemic has affected instruction and learning;
   •   Requirements under the Federal Financial Accountability Transparency Act (“FFATA”);
       and
   •   Additional reporting requirements as may be necessary to ensure accountability and
       transparency of ARP ESSER funds.




                                                                                                 54
Appendix C: Assurances

By signing this document, the SEA assures all of the following:

   •   The SEA will conduct all its operations so that no person shall be excluded from
       participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under the ARP
       ESSER program or activity based on race, color, national origin, which includes a
       person’s limited English proficiency or English learner status and a person’s actual or
       perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics; sex; age; or disability. These non-
       discrimination obligations arise under Federal civil rights laws, including but not limited
       to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of
       1972, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of
       1975. In addition, the SEA must comply with all regulations, guidelines, and standards
       issued by the Department under any of these statutes;

   •   The SEA will comply with all ARP Act and other ARP ESSER requirements and all
       requirements of its Grant Award Notification, including but not limited to:
           o Complying with the maintenance of effort provision in section 2004(a)(1) of the
             ARP Act, absent a waiver by the Secretary pursuant to section 2004(a)(2) of the
             ARP Act; and
           o Complying with the maintenance of equity provisions in section 2004(b) of the
             ARP Act, and ensuring its LEAs comply with the maintenance of equity provision
             in section 2004(c) of the ARP Act (please note that the Department will provide
             additional guidance on maintenance of equity shortly);

   •   The SEA will allocate ARP ESSER funds to LEAs in an expedited and timely manner
       and, to the extent practicable, not later than 60 days after the SEA receives ARP ESSER
       funds (i.e., 60 days from the date the SEA receives each portion of its ARP ESSER
       funds). An SEA that is not able to allocate such funds within 60 days because it is not
       practicable (e.g., because of pre-existing State board approval requirements) will provide
       an explanation to the Department within 30 days of receiving each portion of its ARP
       ESSER funds (submitted via email to your Program Officer at [State].OESE@ed.gov
       (e.g., Alabama.OESE@ed.gov)), including a description of specific actions the SEA is
       taking to provide ARP ESSER funds to LEAs in an expedited and timely manner and the
       SEA’s expected timeline for doing so;

   •   The SEA will implement evidence-based interventions as required under section 2001(f)
       of the ARP Act and ensure its LEAs implement evidence-based interventions, as required
       by section 2001(e)(1) of the ARP Act;

   •   The SEA will address the disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on
       underserved students (i.e., students from low-income families, students from racial or
       ethnic groups (e.g., identifying disparities and focusing on underserved student groups by
       race or ethnicity), gender (e.g., identifying disparities and focusing on underserved
       student groups by gender), English learners, children with disabilities, students
       experiencing homelessness, children and youth in foster care, and migratory students), as
                                                                                               55
    required under section 2001(f) of the ARP Act, and ensure its LEAs address the
    disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on underserved students (i.e.,
    students from low-income families, students from racial or ethnic groups, gender, English
    learners, children with disabilities, students experiencing homelessness, children and
    youth in foster care, and migratory students), as required by section 2001(e)(1) of the
    ARP Act; and

•   The SEA will provide to the Department: (1) the URL(s) where the public can readily
    find data on school operating status and (2) the URL(s) for the SEA and/or LEA websites
    where the public can find the LEA plans for a) the safe return to in-person instruction and
    continuity of services required under section 2001(i) of the ARP Act, and b) use of ARP
    ESSER funds. SEAs should consider ensuring a standardized URL format in all cases
    (e.g., xxx.gov/COVIDplan).




                                                                                            56
Appendix D

                                               OMB Control No. 1894-0005 (Exp. 06/30/2023)

                                              Notice to All Applicants

The purpose of this enclosure is to inform            beneficiaries with special needs. This
you about a new provision in the                      provision allows applicants discretion in
Department of Educations General                      developing the required description. The
Education Provisions Act ("GEPA") that                statute highlights six types of barriers that
applies to applicants for new grant awards            can impede equitable access or participation:
under Department programs. This provision             gender, race, national origin, color,
is Section 427 of GEPA, enacted as part of            disability, or age. Based on local
the Improving America's Schools Act of                circumstances, you should determine
1994 (Public Law (P.L.) 103-382).                     whether these or other barriers may prevent
                                                      your students, teachers, etc. from such
To Whom Does This Provision Apply?                    access to, or participation in, the Federally-
                                                      funded project or activity. The description in
Section 427 of GEPA affects applicants for            your application of steps to be taken to
new grant awards under this program. All              overcome these barriers need not be lengthy;
applicants for new awards must include                you may provide a clear and succinct
information in their applications to                  description of how you plan to address those
address this new provision in order to                barriers that are applicable to your
receive funding under this program.                   circumstances. In addition, the information
                                                      may be provided in a single narrative, or, if
(If this program is a State-formula grant             appropriate, may be discussed in connection
program, a State needs to provide this                with related topics in the application.
description only for projects or activities that
it carries out with funds reserved for State-         Section 427 is not intended to duplicate the
level uses. In addition, local school districts       requirements of civil rights statutes, but
or other eligible applicants that apply to the        rather to ensure that, in designing their
State for funding need to provide this                projects, applicants for Federal funds
description in their applications to the State        address equity concerns that may affect the
for funding. The State would be responsible           ability of certain potential beneficiaries to
for ensuring that the school district or other        fully participate in the project and to achieve
local entity has submitted a sufficient               high standards. Consistent with program
section 427 statement as described below.)            requirements and its approved application,
                                                      an applicant may use the Federal funds
                                                      awarded to it to eliminate barriers it
What Does This Provision Require?
                                                      identifies.
Section 427 requires each applicant for
funds (other than an individual person) to
include in its application a description of the
steps the applicant proposes to take to
ensure equitable access to, and participation
in, its Federally-assisted program for
students, teachers, and other program
                                                                                                  57
What are Examples of How an Applicant
Might Satisfy the Requirement of This
Provision?

The following examples may help illustrate
how an applicant may comply with Section
427.

  (1) An applicant that proposes to carry
      out an adult literacy project serving,
      among others, adults with limited
      English proficiency, might describe
      in its application how it intends to
      distribute a brochure about the
      proposed project to such potential
      participants in their native language.

  (2) An applicant that proposes to develop
      instructional materials for classroom
      use might describe how it will make
      the materials available on audio tape
      or in braille for students who are
      blind.

  (3) An applicant that proposes to carry
      out a model science program for
      secondary students and is concerned
      that girls may be less likely than boys
      to enroll in the course, might indicate
      how it intends to conduct "outreach"
      efforts to girls, to encourage their
      enrollment.

  (4) An applicant that proposes a project
      to increase school safety might
      describe the special efforts it will take
      to address concerns of lesbian, gay,
      bisexual, and transgender students,
      and efforts to reach out to and involve
      the families of LGBT students.

We recognize that many applicants may
already be implementing effective steps to
ensure equity of access and participation in
their grant programs, and we appreciate your
cooperation in responding to the
requirements of this provision.




                                                  58
                   Estimated Burden Statement for GEPA Requirements

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a
collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public
reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3 hours per
response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain or retain
benefit (Public Law 103-382). Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other
aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the
U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20210-4537 or
email ICDocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1894-0005.


File and source

File
department-of-education-pdf-www-ed-gov-79597a51f3.pdf
Size
708,424 bytes
SHA-256
f070fb356a3db7b4f39a0572da7a549c19f410fa96c1e1368bb638ef455e593f
Our copy
department-of-education-pdf-www-ed-gov-79597a51f3.pdf
Original
www.ed.gov
Back to top