Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Letter to the Oregon Department of Education — Reasonable Level of Tolerance (June 18, 2024)

Letter to the Oregon Department of Education — Reasonable Level of Tolerance (June 18, 2024)

Summary

A letter dated June 18, 2024 from the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, signed by Laura Jimenez, to Director Charlene Williams of the Oregon Department of Education. It responds to Oregon's amended plan for a reasonable level of tolerance in calculating maintenance of equity under the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 for fiscal year 2023, which proposes six tolerance levels from a 14 percent reduction for micro districts of 10 or fewer students to a 21 percent reduction for large virtual charters. The Department finds levels 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 reasonable but not level 4, a 1 percent tolerance for districts of 1,000 to 11,000 students. It adds that Oregon will need to make an additional payment to one district.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Issuer
Congressional materials
Document type
Department Of Education 6 18 2024 Used Response To Tolerance Proposal Fy23 Www Ed Gov 294D
Case
Department Of Education 6 18 2024 Used Response To Tolerance Proposal Fy23 Www Ed Gov 294Ddb5Fd4

Cite this document

“Letter to the Oregon Department of Education — Reasonable Level of Tolerance (June 18, 2024).” Original at www.ed.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/department-of-education-6-18-2024-used-response-to-tolerance-proposal-fy23-www-ed-gov-294ddb5fd4/, SHA-256 ab028b848f00038bd15ecf7cdfdc487716e0717c10c4f7f0b7c5066cf376f9f5.

Full text

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION

June 18, 2024

The Honorable Dr. Charlene Williams
Director

Oregon Department of Education

255 Capitol Street, N.E.

Salem, OR 97310

Dear Director Williams:

The U.S. Department of Education (Department) received your amended plan for a reasonable
level of tolerance when calculating whether the Oregon Department of Education (ODE) has met
State maintenance of equity requirements in fiscal year (FY) 2023 under the American Rescue
Plan Act of 2021 (ARP Act). This written plan applies only to a subset of Oregon’s local
educational agencies (LEAs).

The ARP Act State maintenance of equity requirements help ensure that State funding supports
LEAs with high concentrations of poverty and students who have been subject to longstanding
opportunity gaps in our education system and experienced the greatest impact from the COVID-
19 pandemic. These requirements are vital for ensuring that States maintain funding to address
the impact of the pandemic on students’ education, and for protecting students in high-need and
highest-poverty LEAs from disproportionate cuts if reductions in State effort do occur.

The Department determined that it is consistent with the State maintenance of equity
requirements to allow a State educational agency (SEA) to calculate whether it has maintained
funding equity with respect to its very small high-need and highest-poverty LEAs within a
reasonable “tolerance level.” The Department’s determination is based on the possibility of
significant volatility in the calculated per-pupil funding amounts for very small LEAs caused by
small changes in student enrollment, which may be unrelated to whether an SEA has achieved
the intent of the requirements. (See Frequently Asked Questions, American Rescue Plan
Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Program, Maintenance of Equity
Requirements, July 26, 2022, Question 21(a).)

According to materials provided by ODE, Oregon’s State funding formula (the State School
Fund) includes a base allocation for all students, as well as weighted funding for students who
require additional services. Oregon also provides supplemental funding, the Small School
Correction (SSC), to LEAs that did not receive sufficient funding through the State School Fund
to operate their small schools. In the context of the funding weights and the SSC, ODE asserts
that calculated per-pupil funding amounts for its very small LEAs are significantly affected by
small changes in attendance rates. Furthermore, ODE’s proposal notes that the State is seeing an
unprecedented enrollment shifts among LEAs in response to the pandemic, which has also
contributed to variations in per-pupil funding. Together, these factors make the annual per-pupil
funding amounts in Oregon’s small LEAs an imperfect indicator of whether the SEA has
achieved the intent of maintaining equity in funding across LEAs.
Accordingly, ODE proposes six tolerance levels. Implications for LEAs identified by the State as
high-need or highest-poverty in FY 2023 are described below:

1) For “Micro Districts” with 10 or fewer students, Oregon proposes to tolerate a 14 percent
reduction in per-pupil funding from year to year. This tier relates to one LEA that served
0.001 percent of Oregon’s students.

2) For “Extremely Small Districts” with enrollments of greater than 10 to 251 students,
Oregon proposes to tolerate a 19 percent reduction in per-pupil funding from year to year.
This tier relates to nine LEAs that served 0.1 percent of Oregon’s students.

3) For “Small Districts” with enrollments of greater than 251 to 1,000 students, Oregon
proposes to tolerate a 6 percent reduction in per-pupil funding from year to year. This tier
relates to six LEAs that served 0.4 percent of Oregon’s students.

4) For “Other Districts Experiencing Reductions” with enrollments of greater than 1,000 to
11,000 students, Oregon proposes to tolerate a 1 percent reduction in per-pupil funding
from year to year. This tier relates to one LEA that served 1.8 percent of Oregon’s
students.

5) For virtual charters with enrollments of fewer than 1,000 students that had extreme shifts
in student enrollment due to increased attendance in a virtual school within the same
LEA, Oregon proposes to tolerate a 2 percent reduction in per-pupil funding from year to
year. This tier relates to one LEA that served 0.2 percent of Oregon’s students.

6) For virtual charters with enrollments of 1,000 to 3,354 students that had extreme shifts in
student enrollment due to increased attendance in a virtual school within the same LEA,
Oregon proposes to tolerate a 21 percent reduction in per-pupil funding from year to year.
This tier relates to five LEAs that served 1.9 percent of Oregon’s students.

After reviewing ODE’s tolerance proposal and accompanying data, the unique circumstances in
the State, and our further State-specific analysis, we have determined that tolerance levels 1, 2, 3,
5, and 6 include reasonable levels of tolerance when calculating whether Oregon has maintained
equity for small LEAs in FY 2023. We do not find extending tolerance to Level 4 LEAs, Other
Districts Experiencing Reductions, to be reasonable, as it is unclear how changes in enrollment
in LEAs of this size would affect per-pupil funding in ways that are unrelated to maintaining
equity as compared to an LEA with many fewer students.

ODE’s proposal indicates that Oregon will need to make an additional payment to one LEA that
experienced a disproportionate reduction in per-pupil funding in FY 2023 and is not captured by
this small LEA tolerance proposal. Please advise the Department when this additional payment
has been made.

We appreciate your diligence in developing this proposal. If you have any questions, please
contact your program officer at Oregon. OESE@ed.gov.

Sincerely,

Laura Jimenez
Director, Office of State and Grantee Relations

File and source

File
department-of-education-6-18-2024-used-response-to-tolerance-proposal-fy23-www-ed-gov-294ddb5fd4.pdf
Size
209,895 bytes
SHA-256
ab028b848f00038bd15ecf7cdfdc487716e0717c10c4f7f0b7c5066cf376f9f5
Our copy
department-of-education-6-18-2024-used-response-to-tolerance-proposal-fy23-www-ed-gov-294ddb5fd4.pdf
Original
www.ed.gov
Back to top