Declaration of Garrett M. Lindsey in Support of Stipulation to Set Briefing Schedule and Set Hearing
Summary
Declaration of Garrett M. Lindsey, a Deputy Attorney General with the California Department of Justice and counsel of record for Plaintiff the State of California, in State of Michigan, State of California, et al. v. DeVos, Case No. 3:20-cv-04478-JD, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Document 62-2, filed July 29, 2020. The declaration supports a stipulation to set a briefing schedule and set a hearing for plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction. It states that the stipulated schedule would delay filing of the opposition by one day and the reply by two days, and that the parties agreed to expedite the hearing date. It is signed /s/ Garrett Lindsey and states it was executed on July 29, 2020, at Los Angeles, California.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Declaration of Garrett M. Lindsey in Support of Stipulation to Set Briefing Schedule and Set Hearing.”
Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/declaration-of-lindsey-in-support-of-stipulation-to-set-briefing-sched-114faf6446/
, SHA-256 da3ab7b4beb5df90734459ef3ac21c7901af30335dfc73b498daa757576d5f20.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 3:20-cv-04478-JD Document 62-2 Filed 07/29/20 Page1of3 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California MICHAEL NEWMAN Senior Assistant Attorney General SARAH E. BELTON Supervising Deputy Attorney General REBEKAH A. FRETZ JAMES F. ZAHRADKA II GARRETT M. LINDSEY (SBN 293456) Deputy Attorneys General 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Telephone: (213) 269-6402 E-mail: Garrett.Lindsey@do}.ca.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff State of California IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF Case No. 3:20-cv-04478-JD CALIFORNIA, et al., DECLARATION OF GARRETT M. Plaintiffs, | LINDSEY IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING v. SCHEDULE AND SET HEARING FOR PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ELISABETH D. DEVOS, in her official capacity as the United States Secretary of Judge: Hon. James Donato Education, and UNITED STATES Trial Date: —§ None set DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Action Filed: July 7, 2020 Defendants. 1 Lindsey Decl. in Supp. of Stip. to Set Briefing Sched. and Set Hearing (3:20-cv-04478-JD) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 3:20-cv-04478-JD Document 62-2 Filed 07/29/20 Page 2 of 3 I, Garrett M. Lindsey, declare as follows: 1. Ihave personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration. If called as a witness, I could and would testify competently to the matters set forth below. 2. [ama Deputy Attorney General with the California Department of Justice, and am counsel of record for Plaintiff the State of California in this matter. 3. In Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction (PI Motion) (ECF No. 35), Plaintiffs assert a likelihood of success on numerous statutory and constitutional claims, contesting Defendants’ unlawful actions in promulgating guidance and regulations relating to public schools’ and state educational entities’ funding of “equitable services” for private school students using moneys appropriated by Congress to address the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on schools. Plaintiffs contend that Defendants have violated separation of powers principles, the Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution, acted ultra vires and in excess of statutory authority in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner in further violation of the APA, and failed to comply with the notice-and-comment requirements of rulemaking in violation of the APA. 4. Inthe PI Motion, Plaintiffs assert that Plaintiffs, their schools, and their students face imminent irreparable harm without a preliminary injunction. The PI Motion asserts that Plaintiffs and their schools will either lose significant emergency COVID-19 pandemic response funding or be significantly restricted in using those funds to respond to the challenges presented by the pandemic. Plaintiffs submitted 15 declarations from state education agencies and local school districts in support (ECF No. 35-2). 5. In the PI Motion, Plaintiffs assert that the balance of equities are in their favor and that an injunction is in the public interest. 6. As described in the stipulation, the parties agreed to a modified briefing schedule to accommodate the Defendants’ request to file their opposition on July 30. On July 20, the Court ordered to the parties to proceed via an expedited briefing schedule (ECF No. 30), wherein the opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction would be filed on July 29, and the reply in 2 Lindsey Decl. in Supp. of Stip. to Set Briefing Sched. and Set Hearing (3:20-cv-04478-JD) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case 3:20-cv-04478-JD Document 62-2 Filed 07/29/20 Page 3 of 3 support would be filed on August 3. The stipulated briefing schedule would delay filing of the opposition by one day and delay filing of the reply by two days. 7. The parties further agreed to expedite the hearing date for Plaintiffs’ PI Motion to address the imminent irreparable harm asserted by Plaintiffs. Quick resolution of Plaintiffs’ PI Motion is imperative as the 2020-2021 school year commences in many school districts within the Plaintiff Jurisdictions in August and clarity is needed to determine how CARES Act funding may be expended to prepare for the school year. 8. The modified briefing schedule and expedited hearing date would not otherwise affect the schedule for the case. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 29, 2020, at Los Angeles, California. /s/ Garrett Lindsey GARRETT LINDSEY DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL 3 Lindsey Decl. in Supp. of Stip. to Set Briefing Sched. and Set Hearing (3:20-cv-04478-JD)
File and source
- File
- 62-att2-declaration-of-lindsey-in-support-of-stipulation-to-set-brie.pdf
- Size
- 136,422 bytes
- SHA-256
- da3ab7b4beb5df90734459ef3ac21c7901af30335dfc73b498daa757576d5f20
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com