Decision and Order with Respect to the Computation of the Allowed Claim of Alah Shehadeh — No. 22-10943 (MEW) (Dkt. 1502, Bankr. S.D.N.Y.)
Summary
A decision and order by Bankruptcy Judge Michael E. Wiles in the Chapter 11 cases of Voyager Digital Holdings, Inc., Case No. 22-10943 (MEW) in the Southern District of New York bankruptcy court, filed 06/30/23 as Doc 1502. Customer Alah Shehadeh disputed how Voyager computed the monthly rewards on his cryptocurrency account, which the Customer Agreement calculated by the daily balance method. After a hearing on April 5, 2023 the court had Voyager declarant Mark Renzi reconstruct every rewards calculation; it finds the customer’s own figures erroneous (an average daily ADA balance for December 2021 of 3520.9 tokens, not 3512.5) and holds under 11 U.S.C. § 502 that he cannot claim a reward for July 2022 because Voyager filed for bankruptcy on July 6, 2022. The order overrules the objections, directs distributions on the scheduled claim amounts and takes effect immediately.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
22-10943-mew Doc 1502 Filed 06/30/23 Entered 06/30/23 12:44:04 Main Document
Pg 1 of 5
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
)
In re: ) Chapter 11
)
VOYAGER DIGITAL HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,1 ) Case No. 22-10943 (MEW)
)
Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered)
)
DECISION AND ORDER WITH RESPECT TO THE COMPUTATION
OF THE ALLOWED CLAIM OF ALAH SHEHADEH
Alah Shehadeh was a customer of Debtor Voyager Digital, LLC (“Voyager”) at the time
these bankruptcy cases were commenced. Voyager filed schedules of its assets and liabilities that
listed certain obligations owing to Mr. Shehadeh and that stated that the amounts owed were not
regarded by Voyager as disputed, unliquidated or contingent. However, Mr. Shehadeh has
questioned whether Voyager has correctly computed the amounts owed to him. His complaints
relate to the computation of interest earnings on items held by Mr. Shehadeh.
Voyager had a program in place under which Mr. Shehadeh and other customers earned
monthly rewards based on their average daily cryptocurrency balances. The Customer Agreement
that governed Mr. Shehadeh’s account states that Voyager would use “the daily balance method
to calculate the Rewards on the Account. This method applies a daily periodic rate to the specific
principal in the Account each day. The daily periodic rate is calculated by dividing the applicable
interest rate by three hundred sixty-five (365) days, even in leap years.” The Customer Agreement
further stated that reward rates for a given month would be announced on or prior to the first
1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification
number, are: Voyager Digital Holdings, Inc. (7687); Voyager Digital, Ltd. (7224); and Voyager Digital, LLC
(8013). The location of the Debtors’ principal place of business is 33 Irving Place, Suite 3060, New York, NY
10003.
22-10943-mew Doc 1502 Filed 06/30/23 Entered 06/30/23 12:44:04 Main Document
Pg 2 of 5
business day of that month. Voyager reserved the right to designate the reward rates in its “sole
discretion.” Voyager also had the right to use “tiered” rates, pursuant to which specified rates
would be applied only to specific portions of amounts on deposit in a customer’s account.
The Voyager website also contained a FAQ that explained how the rewards calculations
would work. It stated:
We take a daily snapshot of all of your eligible holdings. Your monthly
annual rewards are calculated based on the average of your daily balance.
All Voyager reward rates are annual. In order to find the monthly rate you
will receive, please make sure to divide the annual rate by 12.
For example, if you hold 5,000 Voyager Tokens for 15 days of a 30 day
month, you will have a monthly average balance of ~ 2,500 Voyager Tokens
and will be eligible for reward payments on that accordingly.
The website also included a FAQ regarding the manner in which reward rates were
announced and changed:
Our annual reward rates are announced once a month typically on or before
the first business date of each month. The reward rate may be tiered, with
specified rates in effect at any time only applied to specific portions of
amounts on deposit.
The foregoing provisions of the Customer Agreement are not in dispute. There is also no
dispute as to the underlying purchases and sales of cryptocurrencies that were credited to Mr.
Shehadeh’s account. The issues raised by Mr. Shehadeh relate to the application of the
principles stated above and to the accuracy of the rewards calculations for Mr. Shehadeh’s
account.
Voyager has filed papers that explain its calculations of Mr. Shehadeh’s rewards,
including the Declaration of Mark Renzi dated April 3, 2023. The manner in which the average
daily balance calculations were performed was discussed with Mr. Shehadeh during a hearing on
April 5, 2023. During that hearing the Court also asked Mr. Renzi to reconstruct all of
2
22-10943-mew Doc 1502 Filed 06/30/23 Entered 06/30/23 12:44:04 Main Document
Pg 3 of 5
Voyager’s rewards calculations and to file the reconstructed calculations on the docket. The
Court also informed Mr. Shehadeh that he would have the opportunity to respond to the
calculations if he continued to question them.
Voyager filed a supplemental declaration by Mr. Renzi on April 8, 2023 that reviewed
Voyager’s rewards calculations in detail. Mr. Renzi concluded that the rewards had properly
been calculated and that the scheduled claim for Mr. Shehadeh was accurate. In this regard, Mr.
Shehadeh’s primary complaints about the calculations were his contentions that the average daily
balances in his account had been miscalculated. Mr. Shehadeh contended, for example, that the
average daily balances for his Bitcoin holdings in November 2021 had been miscalculated.
However, the records show (and Mr. Shehadeh did not deny) that he deposited Bitcoin into his
account at Voyager on November 9, 2021. He held 0.281017 BTC in his account for a portion
of November 2021, but rewards were payable only with respect to the “average daily balance,”
not the “ending” balance in his account.
Mr. Renzi’s supplemental declaration explained the average daily balance calculations
and the monthly reward rates that were applied, and did so with respect to every reward
calculation. On April 12, 2023, the Court extended Mr. Shehadeh’s time to file a response. Mr.
Shehadeh filed a further response on April 20, 2023, in which he continued to object to
Voyager’s calculations.
I have now reviewed the detailed calculations submitted by Mr. Renzi and the objections
to them that Mr. Shehadeh has filed. Mr. Renzi’s calculations show that rewards were added to
Mr. Shehadeh’s account on the second day of each month; for example, the reward with respect
to Mr. Shehadeh’s ADA holdings in November 2021 was added to his account balance on
December 2, 2021. Mr. Shehadeh’s calculations with respect to ADA are carried to the seventh
3
22-10943-mew Doc 1502 Filed 06/30/23 Entered 06/30/23 12:44:04 Main Document
Pg 4 of 5
decimal point whereas Mr. Renzi’s calculations were rounded to a single decimal point, which
makes a comparison more difficult. I note, however, that Mr. Shehadeh’s calculations of his
ADA balances are erroneous. In this submission he alleged (for example) that his average daily
ADA balance for December 2021 was 3512.5. In fact, he had deposited 3512.5 ADA tokens in
his account in November 2021 and had earned a reward for November 2021 of 8.8 ADA tokens;
the reward was added to his account balance on December 2, 2021, which meant that his actual
average daily account balance for the entire month of December 2021 was 3520.9 ADA tokens.
Mr. Shehadeh’s calculations also assumed an interest rate of 4.5% with respect to ADA in
February 2021, whereas it appears the correct rate was 4%. The largest discrepancy in the
parties’ calculations is for July 2022, as to which Mr. Shehadeh believes he was entitled to a
reward of 8.99193568 ADA tokens. However, Voyager filed for bankruptcy on July 6, 2022.
Mr. Shehadeh is entitled to a claim based on what his actual account balances were at the time
the bankruptcy occurred. See 11.U.S.C. § 502. He is not entitled to add amounts that he might
have earned if the bankruptcy filing had not occurred and if rewards had been paid, in August
2022, for the month of July 2022.
Mr. Shehadeh also contends that he deposited 4.03768 ETH on November 9, 2021. He
believes that his December 2021 reward should have increased his holding to 4.05315777 ETH.
However, Mr. Renzi’s calculations show that Mr. Shehadeh earned ETH rewards of .01031 for
November 2021 (which were added to his account on December 2, 2021) and ETH rewards of
.01551 for December 2021 (which were added to his account on January 2, 2022). The post-
December 2021 ETH balance that Voyager showed is 4.06351, which is higher than Mr.
Shehadeh’s calculations suggested.
4
22-10943-mew Doc 1502 Filed 06/30/23 Entered 06/30/23 12:44:04 Main Document
Pg 5 of 5
Mr. Shehadeh did not offer other calculations, but I have reviewed Mr. Renzi’s
calculations and they appear to be entirely in order. I therefore conclude that Voyager’s
calculations of Mr. Shehadeh’s account balances are correct. It is therefore
ORDERED, that Mr. Shehadeh’s objections to his scheduled claims are overruled; and it
is further
ORDERED, that Voyager shall make distributions available to Mr. Shehadeh based on
the scheduled amounts of his claims; and it is further
ORDERED, that this Order shall take effect immediately and shall not be subject to any
stay.
Dated: New York, New York
June 30, 2023
/s/ Michael E. Wiles
Honorable Michael E. Wiles
United States Bankruptcy Judge
5
File and source
- File
- 1502.pdf
- Size
- 169,874 bytes
- SHA-256
- 0509ba1ade9389235a36bfd104ddd1633dc2179c2b8a90af9e60d81143e91df8
- Our copy
- 1502.pdf
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com