Decision and Order on Motion to Sever Defendants for Trial — United States v. Aaron C. Smith, No. 19-CR-134 (Dkt. 15, E.D. Wis.)
Summary
Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph of the Eastern District of Wisconsin granted Aaron C. Smith's motion to sever the defendants for trial in United States v. Aaron C. Smith, Case No. 19-CR-134, in a decision and order dated September 9, 2019 at Milwaukee. A grand jury returned a three-count indictment on July 16, 2019 against Smith and Keanna R. King; Smith is charged with possession of a firearm as a felon and with influencing King's testimony in an official proceeding, and pleaded not guilty. Smith argued that admitting certain statements by King would prejudice the defense in ways cross-examination or jury instructions could not cure, citing Bruton v. United States. The government did not object, and the court found severance appropriate under Bruton. Objections were due September 13, 2019, ahead of the final pretrial conference on September 26, 2019 and trial on October 7, 2019.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 19-CR-134
AARON C. SMITH,
Defendant.
DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SEVER DEFENDANTS FOR TRIAL
On July 16, 2019, the grand jury returned a three-count indictment against Aaron C.
Smith and Keanna R. King. (Docket # 1.) Smith is charged with possession of a firearm as a
felon and with influencing King’s testimony in an official proceeding. (Id. at 1–2.) Smith was
arraigned on the charges and entered a plea of not guilty. (Docket # 9.) The final pretrial
conference and jury trial are scheduled before the Honorable Judge Griesbach on September
26, 2019 and October 7, 2019, respectively.
Before me is Smith’s motion to sever the defendants for trial. (Docket # 14.) Smith
argues that admission of certain statements by King would be prejudicial to his defense, which
prejudice could not be dispelled by cross-examination if King does not take the stand or by
limiting instructions to the jury. (Id. (citing Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968)) The
response date has passed with no objection to Smith’s motion from the government. Because
I also find severance of the defendants appropriate under Bruton, the motion will be granted.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Smith’s motion to sever the
defendants for trial (Docket # 14) is GRANTED.
FURTHER, to accommodate the Final Pretrial Hearing scheduled for September 26,
2019, any objections to this recommendation shall be filed September 13, 2019 and any
responses by September 19, 2019. Objections are to be filed in accordance with the Eastern
District of Wisconsin’s electronic case filing procedures. Failure to file a timely objection with
the district court shall result in a waiver of a party’s right to appeal. If no response or reply
will be filed, please notify the Court in writing.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 9th day of September, 2019.
BY THE COURT
s/Nancy Joseph____________
NANCY JOSEPH
United States Magistrate Judge
2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.wied.86407.15.0.pdf
- Size
- 61,358 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5a9107e302513f721781a8fc75f597417ff3b2b58eb91a49c6bdcd70381eae02
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.wied.86407.15.0.pdf
- Original
- archive.org