Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Criminal Information — United States v. Olivia Ware (N.D. Ga., Document 1, March 16, 2021)Search ⌕

Criminal Information — United States v. Olivia Ware (N.D. Ga., Document 1, March 16, 2021)

Summary

A criminal information in United States v. Olivia Ware, No. 1:21-CR-098, Case 1:21-cr-00098-ELR-JKL, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, filed March 16, 2021 as Document 1. Count 1 charges bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1344 against Bank OZK, and Count 2 charges money laundering under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957. The information alleges that Ware submitted false tax forms and payroll records for Let’s Talk About the Family, Inc. claiming fifty-four (54) employees, and that Bank OZK funded a $323,100 PPP loan on or about May 13, 2020. It alleges the proceeds went to personal uses, including approximately $23,800 for an in-ground swimming pool and payment of a residential mortgage. Count 2 cites checks totaling $23,800 dated June 24, 2020.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Criminal Information — United States v. Olivia Ware (N.D. Ga., Document 1, March 16, 2021).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/criminal-information-no-1-21-cr-00098-dkt-1-n-d-ga-f773569258/, SHA-256 b2c3fbf8f0c09a7db7986c9a8a36aec0c933d74fde35386b8ae2dbda9a86c4b5.

Full text

    Case 1:21-cr-00098-ELR-JKL Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 1FILED
                                                                 of 10IN OPEN COURT
                                                                            U.S.D.C. Atlanta
                                                                                     -




                                                                            MAR 162021
                                                                        JAMES N. FlATTEN, Clerk
                                                                      By:         I’i7/W1
                                                                                  UI • beputy Clerk


                 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
                          ATLANTA DIVISION


   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                             Criminal Information

   OLIVIA WARE                               No. 1:21-CR-098


THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHARGES THAT:

                                    COUNT 1
                          (Bank Fraud —18 U.S.C. § 1344)
      1. Beginning on a date unknown, but from at least in or about April 2020,
and continuing until May 13, 2020, in the Northern District of Georgia and
elsewhere, the defendant, OLIVIA WARE, knowingly executed and attempted to
execute a scheme and artifice to defraud Bank OZK, a financial institution
headquartered in Litfie Rock, Arkansas, and insured by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), and to obtain, by means of materially false and
fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, and by omissions of
material fact, money, funds, and other property owned by and under the custody
and control of Bank OZK, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1344.
                                   Background
   It is relevant to the Information that during the above-listed time period:
      2. The defendant, OLiVIA WARE, was a resident of the Northern District
of Georgia.
     Case 1:21-cr-00098-ELR-JKL Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 2 of 10




       3. WARE was the registered agent and Chief Executive Officer of Let’s
Talk About the Family, Inc., a Georgia corporation headquartered at WARE’s
residence.
       4. The United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) was an
executive branch agency of the United States government that provided support
to entrepreneurs and small businesses. The mission of the SBA was to maintain
and strengthen the nation’s economy by enabling the establishment and viability
of small businesses and by assisting in the economic recovery of communities
after disasters.
      5. As part of this effort, the SBA enabled and provided for loans through
banks, credit unions, and other lenders. These loans had government-backed
guarantees.
       6. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act
was a federal law enacted in or about March 2020 and designed to provide
emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans who are suffering
the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
      7. One source of relief provided by the CARES Act was the authorization
of up to $349 billion in forgivable loans to small businesses for payroll, mortgage
interest, rent/lease, and utilities, through a program referred to as the Paycheck
Protection Program (“PPP”). In April 2020, Congress authorized over $300
billion in additional PPP funding.
      8. The PPP allowed qualifying small businesses and other organizations
to receive PPP loans. Businesses must use PPP loan proceeds for payroll costs,

                                         2
    Case 1:21-cr-00098-ELR-JKL Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 3 of 10




interest on mortgages, rent/lease, and utilities. The PPP allowed the interest and
principal on the PPP loan to be entirely forgiven if the business spent the loan
proceeds on these expense items within a designated period of time and used a
certain percentage of the PPF loan proceeds for payroll expenses.
      9. The amount of a PPP loan that a small business may have been entitled
to receive was determined by the number of employees employed by the
business and the business’s average monthly payroll costs.
      10. To obtain a PH’ loan, a qualifying business must submit a PPP loan
application, signed by an authorized representative of the business. The PPP
loan application required the business (through its authorized representative) to
acknowledge the program rules and make certain affirmative certifications to be
eligible to obtain the PPP loan. In the PPP loan application, the small business
(through its authorized representative) must state, among other things, its: (a)
average monthly payroll expenses, and (b) number of employees. These figures
were used to calculate the amount of money the small business was eligible to
receive under the PPP. In addition, businesses applying for a PPP loan had to
provide documentation showing their payroll expenses.
      11. The SBA oversaw the PPP. However, individual PPP loans were issued
by private, approved lenders who received and processed PPP applications and
supporting documentation, and then made loans using the lenders’ own funds,
which were 100% guaranteed by the SBA. Data from the application, including
information about the borrower, the total amount of the loan, and the listed



                                         3
    Case 1:21-cr-00098-ELR-JKL Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 4 of 10




number of employees, was transmitted by the lender to the SBA while processing
the loan.
      12. Bank OZK was an FDIC-insured financial institution headquartered in
Little Rock, Arkansas. Bank OZK was a PPP lender, and was authorized to lend
funds to eligible borrowers under the terms of the PPP.
                         Purpose of the Scheme to Defraud
      13. The purpose of the scheme was for WARE, by submitting false and
fraudulent information about her business Let’s Talk About the Family, Inc., to
unlawfully obtain a PPF loan from Bank OZK and to use the fraudulently-
acquired loan proceeds to benefit herself and others who did not work for Let’s
Talk About the Family, Inc., in violation of the terms of the PPP loan agreement.
                                Manner and Means
      14. The manner and means by which WARE carried out the scheme to
defraud included the following:
      15. WARE submitted, and caused to be submitted, to Bank OZK false and
fraudulent documents concerning Let’s Talk About the Family, Inc. The false
and fraudulent documents generally created the appearance that the business
earned millions of dollars in revenue, paid more than a million dollars in payroll,
and had fifty-four (54) employees. For example, WARE submitted, and caused
to be submitted, the following records to Bank OZK in connection with her
application of a PPP loan:
            a. A false and fraudulent 2018 IRS Form 11209 (“U.S. Income Tax
              Return for an S Corporation”) for Let’s Talk About the Family, Inc.

                                         4
    Case 1:21-cr-00098-ELR-JKL Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 5 of 10




             that claimed that the company had gross receipts of $5,943,228
             against a cost of goods sold of $5,140,927.
         b. A false and fraudulent 2019 IRS Form 940 (“Employer’s Annual
             Federal Unemployment (FUTA) Tax Return”) for Let’s Talk About
             the Family, Inc. that claimed that the company paid $1,551,057 to its
             employees.
         c. A false and fraudulent 2020 IRS Form 941 (“Employer’s
             QUARTERLY Federal Tax Return”) for Let’s Talk About the Family,
             Inc. that claimed that in the first tax quarter, the company: (1) paid a
             total of $329,950.51 in wages, tips, or other compensation, (2) had
             fifty-four (54) employees, and (3) withheld $39,594.06 in federal
             income tax.
         d. A payroll document that purported to show the salaries of Let’s Talk
             About the Family, Inc.’s fifty-four (54) employees.
      16. In fact, from 2019 through the first quarter of 2020, Let’s Talk About the
Family, Inc. did not: (1) make any tax filings with the IRS, (2) pay unemployment
tax to the IRS, (3) withhold federal income tax for any employee, or (4) have fifty-
four (54) employees.
      17. It was also part of the scheme to defraud that WARE submitted a PPP
loan application to Bank OZK in which WARE sought a loan of approximately
$323,100. In the PPP loan application, WARE falsely certified that any PPP funds
loaned to Let’s Talk About the Family, Inc. would be used to retain workers, to
fund payroll, and to make mortgage interest payments, lease payments, and

                                          5
    Case 1:21-cr-00098-ELR-JKL Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 6 of 10




utility payments. In fact, as WARE well knew, when she submitted the PPP loan
application, she intended to spend (and did spend) the PPP money to benefit.
herself and others who did not work for Let’s Talk About the Family, Inc.
      18. On or about May 13, 2020, based on WARE’s false and fraudulent
misrepresentations, Bank OZK approved and funded a PPP loan for Let’s Talk
About the Family, Inc. in the amount of $323,100. Bank OZK transferred the PPP
loan to an account at Bank OZK, opened by WARE, and ending in the numbers
9520. WARE also transferred, and caused the transfer of, some of the PPP funds
from the 9520 account to a second account at Bank OZK, also opened by WARE,
and ending in the numbers 5245.
      19. By way of example only, using the PPP money in the 9520 account and
the 5245 account as follows, WARE:
         a. wrote checks totaling tens of thousands of dollars to individuals
            who were not employees of Let’s Talk About the Family, Inc.,
            including apparent family members;
         b. paid approximately $23,800 for an in-ground swimming pool for
            WARE’s residence;
         c. paid off the principal on the mortgage of her residence;
         d. spent tens of thousands of dollars on furniture, video equipment,
            light fixtures, and other home improvement items; and
         e. paid bills that were personal and otherwise unrelated to Let’s Talk
            About the Family, Inc.



                                        6
    Case 1:21-cr-00098-ELR-JKL Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 7 of 10




                             Execution, of the Scheme
      20. On or about the date set forth below, in the Northern District of Georgia
and elsewhere, the defendant, OLIVIA WARE, knowingly executed and
attempted to execute a scheme and artifice to defraud Bank OZK, the deposits of
which were then insured by the FDIC, and to obtain, by means of materially false
and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, and by omission of
material facts, money, funds, and other property owned by and under the
custody and control of Bank OZK, a financial institution,



 April 28, 2020
                          IIIIIIIUUIII!1N~IlII~
                    Submission of PPP   $ 323,100                    May 13, 2020
                    Loan Application
   all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344.
                                   COUNT 2
                       (Money Laundering 18 U.s.c. § 1957)
                                           -




      21. The United States Attorney re-alleges and incorporates herein by
reference the factual allegations set forth in paragraphs 1 through 19 of this
Information.
      22. On or about the date set forth below, in the Northern District of
Georgia, the defendant OLIVIA WARE, knowingly engaged and attempted to
engage in the following monetary transaction by, through, and to a financial
institution, affecting interstate and foreign commerce, in criminally derived
property of a value greater than $10,000, that is, the deposit withdrawal, and
transfer of United States currency as described below, such property having been


                                          7
    Case 1:21-cr-00098-ELR-JKL Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 8 of 10




derived from a specified unlawful activity, that is, bank fraud, as charged in
Count 1 of the Information,

      1I~1ILI~~UIII1D1I ~
         June 24, 2020    Check numbers 1051, 1058, 1059, 1060, and 1065,
                          •each for $4,760 (for a total of $23,800) drawn
                          against the Bank OZK account number ending
                          in 9520, and payable to a person with the initials
                          of J.D., the owner of Pools for Less, LLC, a
                          Florida-based company.
   all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1957.
                                   FORFEITURE

      23. Upon conviction of the offense alleged in Count One of the Information,

the defendant, OLIVIA WARE, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title

18, United States Code, Section 982(a) (2), any property constituting, or derived

from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of said violation,

including, but not limited to, the following:

         a. MONEY JUDGMENT: A sum of money in United States currency,

             representing the amount of proceeds obtained as a result of the

             offense alleged in Count One of this Information.

      24. Upon conviction of the offense alleged in Count Two of the

Information, the defendant OLIVIA WARE, shall forfeit to the United States,

pursuant to Tile 18, United States Code, Section 982(a) (1), any property, real or

personal, involved in such offense, or any property traceable to such property,

including, but not limited to, the following:


                                          8
    Case 1:21-cr-00098-ELR-JKL Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 9 of 10




         a. MONEY JUDGMENT: A sum of money in United States currency,

            representing the amount of proceeds obtained as a result of the

            offenses alleged in Count Two of this Information.

      25. If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act

or omission of the defendant:

      a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;

      b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;

      c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court;

      d. has been substantially diminished in value; or

      e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided

         without difficulty;




                               [Intentionally left blank]




                                           9
   Case 1:21-cr-00098-ELR-JKL Document 1 Filed 03/16/21 Page 10 of 10




it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code,

Section 853(p), as incorporated by Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(b)(1)

and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), to seek forfeiture of any other

property of said defendant up to the value of the forfeitable property described

above.


KURT R. ERSKINE
 Acting United States Attorney

3wta 7H~4
BERNITA MALL~Y
 Assistant United States Attorney
Georgia Bar No. 718905

~
TREVOR C. WILMOT
 Assistant United States Attorney
Georgia Bar No. 936961
600 U.S. Courthouse
75 Ted Turner Drive SW
Atlanta, GA 30303
404-581-6000; Fax: 404-581-6181




                                          10


File and source

File
1-criminal-information-olivia-ware.pdf
Size
298,359 bytes
SHA-256
b2c3fbf8f0c09a7db7986c9a8a36aec0c933d74fde35386b8ae2dbda9a86c4b5
Our copy
1-criminal-information-olivia-ware.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top