Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents COVID-19: The Potential Role of TANF in Addressing the Economic Effects (IN11241, Version 3, Updated April 1, 2020)

COVID-19: The Potential Role of TANF in Addressing the Economic Effects (IN11241, Version 3, Updated April 1, 2020)

Summary

A Congressional Research Service Insight, IN11241 (Version 3), by Gene Falk, Specialist in Social Policy, updated April 1, 2020, on the potential role of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant in addressing the economic effects of COVID-19. It describes TANF, created by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA, P.L. 104-193), its nonrecurrent short-term benefits of up to four months, and a $2 billion contingency fund that was exhausted in the last recession and now receives $608 million per year. It states that P.L. 116-136, the CARES Act, extends TANF funding through November 30, 2020 without additional funding or changes to work rules, and that HHS guidance says it can relieve states of penalties for failing to meet work participation standards.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                                                                                              INSIGHTi



COVID-19: The Potential Role of TANF in
Addressing the Economic Effects

Gene Falk
Specialist in Social Policy

Updated April 1, 2020
The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant provides grants to the 50 states,
District of Columbia, American Indian tribes, and certain territories with the broad purpose of
ameliorating and addressing root causes of childhood economic disadvantage. Some of the flexibility the
block grant affords to states has been used, and augmented by federal legislation, to address the fallout
from Hurricane Katrina and the deep economic recession of 2007-2009.

Overview of TANF
TANF was created by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996
(PRWORA, P.L. 104-193) and is best known as funding for state programs that provide monthly
assistance to needy families with children. PRWORA placed work requirements on states and time limits
on families that receive this assistance. TANF funds a wide range of benefits and services—including
what are known as “non-recurrent short-term benefits,” which are defined as aid that addresses a specific
episode of need and does not exceed four months. The receipt of a nonrecurrent short-term benefit does
not count toward a family’s time limit, nor other requirements such as those related to work, assigning
child support to the state, and state reporting of detailed characteristics. In crafting a response to
Hurricane Katrina in 2005, Congress enacted special rules to permit states to tap an existing fund to pay
nonrecurrent short-term benefits to families evacuated from their homes because of Hurricane Katrina.
In terms of addressing unemployment related to a recession, TANF can also fund employment services
and subsidized employment. If an individual is in subsidized employment, the requirements of assistance
(e.g., time limits) also do not count.




                                                                         Congressional Research Service
                                                                                                  7-....
                                                                                             www.crs.gov
                                                                                                  IN11241

CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress
Congressional Research Service                                                                               2




TANF Funding
The basic TANF block grant provided to states was established in PRWORA in 1996, based on spending
in its predecessor programs in the early 1990s. The basic block grant has not been adjusted for inflation or
changes in other circumstances (e.g., population growths and shifts among the states). It represents the
bulk of funding available to the states under TANF. Nationally, the assistance caseload is about 25% of
what it was in the 1990s, and states have shifted TANF funds to a wide range of activities.
PRWORA also contained a $2 billion contingency fund for economic downturns. However, that fund was
exhausted in the last recession; in recent years, Congress has provided appropriations of $608 million per
year to it. The fund is spent each year regardless of economic conditions. It is expected to be exhausted in
April of this year. Thus, there is little in the way of additional federal funding for states to meet
unexpected costs related to COVID-19.
States also have the ability to “reserve” (save) TANF funding. Some states have relatively large reserves,
others have no reserves.

Potential Legislation to Address the Effects of the COVID-19 Outbreak
The flexibility of states’ use of TANF make it a possible source of funding for them to address the
unknown and evolving needs of families resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. However, states may
not have funds to meet unexpected costs. Moreover, the fund that was tapped to provide states with help
to address Hurricane Katrina is in the process of being exhausted for the current fiscal year.
Congress responded to the economic downturn of 2007-2009 by creating a separate emergency fund.
Such a fund to provide for increased short-term benefits would be an option to address the immediate
economic needs of families resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Further, Congress might consider
addressing not only these emergency needs, but also the lack of a counter-cyclical funding mechanism for
states under TANF. That is, if the economy does go into recession, there is no automatic TANF funding to
address it. The emergency fund created for the 2007-2009 recession might be considered a model for such
a fund.
Additionally, Congress might consider addressing TANF work participation standards. These standards
are rules for states, not individuals, and states are penalized if they do not have a sufficient number of
families participating for a minimum number of hours per week. Thus, they do help guide how states set
work requirements for individual recipients.
TANF regulations require that all hours that an individual is in paid employment—including paid sick
leave—count toward meeting the hourly requirement. However, the regulations limit to 16 hours per
month excused absences from non-paid activities because of illness. States may excuse hours for
individual recipients, providing “good cause” exemptions for those who are sick or caring for family
members. However, this could disadvantage states in meeting their work participation standards. The
U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services may, but is not required to, provide a “reasonable cause”
waiver of the penalty imposed on a state for failure to meet the TANF work requirements.
P.L. 116-136, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (or CARES Act) extends TANF
funding through November 30, 2020. It does not provide additional TANF funding to states or address
TANF work rules for recipients of assistance. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has
issued guidance to states to help them respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that while it cannot
waive TANF work rules, it can relieve states of penalties for states’ failure to meet these standards and
“will exercise this authority to the maximum extent possible.”
Congressional Research Service                                   3




                                 IN11241 · VERSION 3 · UPDATED
EveryCRSReport.com

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) is a federal legislative branch agency, housed inside the
Library of Congress, charged with providing the United States Congress non-partisan advice on
issues that may come before Congress.

EveryCRSReport.com republishes CRS reports that are available to all Congressional staff. The
reports are not classified, and Members of Congress routinely make individual reports available to
the public.

Prior to our republication, we redacted phone numbers and email addresses of analysts who
produced the reports. We also added this page to the report. We have not intentionally made any
other changes to any report published on EveryCRSReport.com.

CRS reports, as a work of the United States government, are not subject to copyright protection in
the United States. Any CRS report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without
permission from CRS. However, as a CRS report may include copyrighted images or material from a
third party, you may need to obtain permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or
otherwise use copyrighted material.

Information in a CRS report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public
understanding of information that has been provided by CRS to members of Congress in
connection with CRS' institutional role.

EveryCRSReport.com is not a government website and is not affiliated with CRS. We do not claim
copyright on any CRS report we have republished.


File and source

File
IN11241.621539.pdf
Size
561,754 bytes
SHA-256
cc6fb000104e3b98afff128df0a8a377a309989f697c58b3b49a8618d3cedfa6
Our copy
IN11241.621539.pdf
Original
www.everycrsreport.com
Back to top