Order, Magistrate Judge Rush's Report and Recommendation — United States v. Derges (W.D. Mo., Document 112)

Summary

An Order dated February 1, 2022 and filed as Document 112 in United States of America v. Patricia Ashton Derges, Case No. 6:21-CR-03016-01-BCW, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Southern Division, signed /s/ Brian C. Wimes. The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Rush's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #110), noting that no objections were filed. For the reasons in the Report and Recommendation, it denies the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment for Prejudicially Compromising 6th Amendment Rights of Defendant to Speedy Trial (Doc. #48). It orders that the Report and Recommendation be attached to and made part of the Order.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
                         WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
                              SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                    )
                                             )
                      Plaintiff,             )
                                             )
v.                                           )       Case No. 6:21-CR-03016-01-BCW
                                             )
PATRICIA ASHTON DERGES,                      )
                                             )
                      Defendant.             )

                                            ORDER

       Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Rush’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. #110)

denying Defendant Patricia Ashton Derges’ Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment for

Prejudicially Compromising 6th Amendment Rights of Defendant to Speedy Trial (Doc. #48). No

objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. After an independent review of the

record, the applicable law, and the parties’ arguments, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Rush’s

findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, it is hereby

       ORDERED for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #110),

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment for Prejudicially Compromising 6th

Amendment Rights of Defendant to Speedy Trial (Doc. #48) is DENIED. It is further

       ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Rush’s Report and Recommendation be attached to and

made part of this Order.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.


DATED: February 1, 2022                              /s/ Brian C. Wimes
                                                     JUDGE BRIAN C. WIMES
                                                     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT




        Case 6:21-cr-03016-BCW Document 112 Filed 02/01/22 Page 1 of 1


File and source

File

112.pdf

Size

79,221 bytes

SHA-256

9230a4646b50827ab14537e65f6f05c8415d6c7b84e3eaaadb46cba824143fde

Our copy

112.pdf

Original

No public link identified.