Order — United States v. Mackenzy Toussaint, 1:21-cr-00247 (S.D.N.Y., Document 310)
Summary
Document 310, filed 07/31/26, in Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE, is an order by Paul A. Engelmayer, District Judge, in United States of America against Mackenzy Toussaint. It recites that on May 6, 2026, the Court issued a preliminary order of forfeiture of substitute assets of Toussaint and denied the defendant's motion for the return of the property at issue. It states that on July 1, 2026, Toussaint filed a new submission that in substance largely tracked two earlier submissions and sought the same relief. The Court denies the latest motion as meritless and tardy, states that its earlier order remains in effect, and directs the Clerk of Court to terminate all pending motions relating to Toussaint. It states that the case remains closed.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order — United States v. Mackenzy Toussaint, 1:21-cr-00247 (S.D.N.Y., Document 310).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-usa-v-bella-dkt-310-s-d-n-y-43d841c80d/
, SHA-256 f2b9e8c7ca0eca93b9079e3693d029ec7e3658441519fb11d30f786ab289e78c.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE Document 310 Filed 07/31/26 Page1of2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 21-CR-247-02 (PAE) ~ ORDER MACKENZY TOUSSAINT, Defendant. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: On May 6, 2026, the Court, following briefing from the parties, issued a preliminary order of forfeiture of substitute assets of defendant Mackenzy Toussaint, and denied the defendant’s motion for the return of the property at issue. See Dkt. 305; see also Dkt. 301 (defendant’s motion for return of property); Dkt. 302 (Government’s motion in support of order and opposition to defendant’s motion for return of property); Dkt. 303 (defendant’s opposition to government’s motion proposed such order and motion in further support of return of property). On July 1, 2026, nearly two months after the Court’s order, Toussaint filed a new submission that in substance largely tracked his two earlier submissions and sought the same relief. See Dkt. 309. The Court denies Mackenzy’s latest motion as meritless and tardy. The Court’s order at Dkt. 305 remains in effect. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate all pending motions relating to Toussaint. This case remains closed. SO ORDERED. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER United States District Judge Dated: July 31, 2026 New York, New York
File and source
- File
- 310.pdf
- Size
- 164,877 bytes
- SHA-256
- f2b9e8c7ca0eca93b9079e3693d029ec7e3658441519fb11d30f786ab289e78c
- Our copy
- 310.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.