Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE Document 15 Filed 05/04/21 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :
:
-v- : 21CR247
:
MACKENZY TOUSSAINT, : ORDER
:
Defendant. :
:
---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
KATHARINE H. PARKER, United States Magistrate Judge:
This Order is entered, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) and the Due
Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No 116–182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020), to confirm the
Government’s disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its
progeny, and to summarize the possible consequences of violating those obligations.
The Government must disclose to the defense all information “favorable to an accused”
that is “material either to guilt or to punishment” and that is known to the Government. Id. at 87.
This obligation applies regardless of whether the defendant requests this information or whether
the information would itself constitute admissible evidence. The Government shall disclose such
information to the defense promptly after its existence becomes known to the Government so
that the defense may make effective use of the information in the preparation of its case.
As part of these obligations, the Government must disclose any information that can be
used to impeach the trial testimony of a Government witness within the meaning of Giglio v.
United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and its progeny. Such information must be disclosed
Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE Document 15 Filed 05/04/21 Page 2 of 3
sufficiently in advance of trial in order for the defendant to make effective use of it at trial or at
such other time as the Court may order. 1
The foregoing obligations are continuing ones and apply to materials that become known
to the Government in the future. These obligations also apply to information that is otherwise
subject to disclosure regardless of whether the Government credits it.
In the event the Government believes that a disclosure under this Order would
compromise witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement
technique, or any other substantial government interest, it may apply to the Court for a
modification of its obligations, which may include in camera review or withholding or subjecting
to a protective order all or part of the information otherwise subject to disclosure. 2
For purposes of this Order, the Government has an affirmative obligation to seek all
information subject to disclosure under this Order from all current or former federal, state, and
local prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and other officers who have participated in the
prosecution, or investigation that led to the prosecution, of the offense or offenses with which the
defendant is charged.
If the Government fails to comply with this Order, the Court, in addition to ordering
production of the information, may:
(1) specify the terms and conditions of such production;
(2) grant a continuance;
(3) impose evidentiary sanctions;
(4) impose contempt or other sanctions on any lawyer responsible for violations of the
Government’s disclosure obligations, or refer the matter to disciplinary authorities;
1
This Order does not purport to set forth an exhaustive list of the Government’s disclosure obligations.
2
The Classified Information Procedures Act sets forth separate procedures to be followed in the event that the
Government believes matters relating to classified information may arise in connection with the prosecution. See 18
U.S.C. app. 3 §§ 1 et seq.
Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE Document 15 Filed 05/04/21 Page 3 of 3
(5) dismiss charges before trial or vacate a conviction after trial or a guilty plea; or
(6) enter any other order that is just under the circumstances.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 4, 2021
New York, New York
______________________________
KATHARINE H. PARKER
United States Magistrate Judge