Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Factual Proffer — U.S. v. Yunior Barrera Almaguer (S.D. Fla.)Search ⌕

Factual Proffer — U.S. v. Yunior Barrera Almaguer (S.D. Fla.)

Summary

A factual proffer in United States of America v. Yunior Barrera Almaguer, Case No. 22-80118-CR-MIDDLEBROOKS/MATTHEWMAN, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered on the docket November 9, 2022 as Document 96. It states that in or around June 2020 the defendant caused fraudulent PPP loan applications for companies including Construction47, Inc., Penas Concrete Pumping Corp. and Garcia & Son Remodeling Services, Corp., overstating employees and payroll. It states that lenders including Kabbage and TD Bank transferred approximately $8 million in PPP funds from June to July 2020. It describes blank pre-signed checks and transfers among companies in the scheme, and the defendant agrees to assisting in obtaining or laundering approximately $8.4 million. The proffer is dated 11-8-2022.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Factual Proffer — U.S. v. Yunior Barrera Almaguer (S.D. Fla.).” Original at ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-usa-v-barrera-almaguer-et-al-dkt-96-s-d-fla-12936ac1e9/, SHA-256 ca0416227c4eb7efcd4696d4c81644e99454cd5b164534a2de44b452cebb6861.

Full text

Case 9:22-cr-80118-DMM Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 1 of 5




                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                  Case No. 22-80118-CR-MIDDLEBROOKS/MATTHEWMAN



     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

     v.

     YUNIOR BARRERA ALMAGUER,

            Defendant.

                                      FACTUAL PROFFER

           If this matter had gone to trial , the United States would have proven the following

    facts beyond a reasonable doubt, which occurred in the Southern District of Florida and

    elsewhere :

          The Coronavirus Aid , Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was a

    federal law enacted in or around March 2020 , designed to provide emergency

    financial assistance to Americans who were suffering the economic effects caused

    by the COVID-19 pandemic. One source of relief provided by the CARES Act was a

    program referred to as the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which authorized

    forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses .

          In order to obtain a PPP loan , a qualifying business submitted a PPP loan

    application , which was signed by an authorized representative of the business . The

    PPP loan application required the business to acknowledge the program rules and

    make certain affirmative certifications in order to be eligible to obtain the loan. In the

    PPP loan application, the small business was required to provide, among other things ,
Case 9:22-cr-80118-DMM Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 2 of 5




    its average monthly payroll expenses and number of employees , which were used to

    calculate the amount of money the small business was eligible to receive .

          A PPP loan application was processed by a participating lender. If a PPP loan

    application was approved , the participating lender funded the PPP loan using its own

    monies, and the loan was 100% guaranteed by the SBA. PPP loan proceeds were

    required to be used by the business to pay expenses necessary to continue the

    operations of the business , including the payroll costs of employees , interest on

    mortgages , rent , and utilities. The interest and principal on the PPP loan could be

    entirely forgiven if the business spent the loan proceeds on these expense items within a

    designated period of time and used a defined portion of the loan proceeds on payroll

    expenses.

          In or around June 2020 , YUNIOR BARRERA ALMAGUER (BARRERA)

    caused the submission of fraudulent PPP loan applications on behalf of multiple

    companies.     Specifically, BARRERA gathered the owner name , social security

    number, date of birth , mailing address , and email address , and the bank account

    routing number for companies such as Construction47 , Inc. , Penas Concrete

    Pumping Corp. , Garcia & Son Remodeling Services , Corp ., and others . BARRERA

    had   an    unindicted   co-conspirator   use   interstate   wire   communications     to

    electronically view and sign a PPP Loan Application Form on behalf of these

    companies , and falsely represent that each company had more employees and a

    higher average monthly payroll than each had in order to obtain the PPP loan .

          From June to July 2020 , based on the false information in the PPP loan


                                               2
Case 9:22-cr-80118-DMM Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 3 of 5




    applications , Bank of America (BofA) , Celtic Bank, Cross River Bank, Kabbage , and

    TD Bank approved the loans and transferred approximately $8 million in PPP funds

    via interstate wire communication to the companies . For example , on or about July

    1, 2020 , based on the false information provided in the PPP loan applications ,

    Kabbage approved loans and transferred the following amounts in PPP funds via

    interstate wire communication : $505 ,952 to Construction47's BofA account, for which

    co-defendant EDUARDO RAMOS LEYVA (RAMOS) was the only signatory;

    $720 ,860 to Penas Concrete's BofA account, for which co-defendant LEINER PENA

    INFANTE (PENA) was the only signatory; and $515,873 to Garcia & Son 's BofA

    account, for which VANDRE GARCIA HERNANDEZ (GARCIA) was the only

    signatory.

          Bank records showed that the companies had low balances and no evidence

    of payroll payments prior to receipt of the PPP funds. For example, immediately prior

    to receipt of the PPP funds , Construction47's BofA account had a balance of

    approximately $19 ,930 .73 , of which $10 ,000 was an Economic Injury Disaster Loan

    payment from the SBA, Penas Concrete 's BofA account had a balance of

    approximately $3 ,200 , and Garcia & Son 's BofA account had a balance of

    approximately $41.87. After these companies received their PPP loans, BARRERA

    instructed RAMOS, PENA, and GARCIA to give him blank, pre-signed checks drawn

    on each company BofA account so that BARRERA could access the PPP funds.

    RAMOS, PENA, and GARCIA also wrote checks on the companies' accounts at

    BARRERA's direction.


                                              3
Case 9:22-cr-80118-DMM Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 4 of 5




          For example, on July 24 , 2020 , BARRERA directed RAMOS to write a check

    to Garcia & Son in the amount of $25 ,000 from Construction47's BofA account, using

    monies in part from the PPP loan as described above. Garcia & Son deposited the

    check in Miami-Dade County into its BofA account, followed by which Garcia & Son

    wrote checks sending the funds to other companies involved in the scheme , such as

    Saihdel Trucking, Inc. , which had also received its own PPP loan in the same scheme

    with BARRERA. On October 7 , 2020 , BARRERA directed PENA to write checks to

    EBO Construction in the amounts of $22,000 and $8 ,000 respectively from Penas

    Concrete's BofA account, using monies from the PPP loan as described above. EBO

    Construction had also received its own PPP loan in the same scheme with

    BARRERA and was controlled by BARRERA. After receiving these checks , EBO

    Construction deposited them in Miami-Dade County into its Wells Fargo account,

    followed by which EBO Construction wrote checks sending the funds to BARRERA's

    company , YBA Auto .

          BARRERA       agrees    that   he   assisted   in   obtaining   and/or   laundering

    approximately $8.4 million in PPP funds through the scheme described above. At all

    times relevant to the offense conduct, BofA and Wells Fargo were banks , the deposits

    of which were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation , and which were

    engaged in , and the activities of which affected , interstate and foreign commerce .

          The parties agree that these facts , which do not include all facts known to the




                                                4
Case 9:22-cr-80118-DMM Document 96 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2022 Page 5 of 5




    United States and BARRERA , are sufficient to prove the offense to which BARRERA is

    pleading guilty.

                                          Respectfully submitted ,

                                          JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ
                                          UN ITED STATES ATTORNEY


    Date :        11-8-2022         By    ~ D:sb--
                                          SUSAN OSBORNE
                                          ASSISTANT UN ITED STATES ATTORNEY



    Date :   1,   lrf v l           By:




    Date : 11 J   ~ / vL            By:
                                          YUN R BARRERA ALMAGUER
                                          DEF NDANT




                                             5


File and source

File
96-factual-proffer-statement-as-to-yunior-barrera-almaguer.pdf
Size
169,034 bytes
SHA-256
ca0416227c4eb7efcd4696d4c81644e99454cd5b164534a2de44b452cebb6861
Our copy
96-factual-proffer-statement-as-to-yunior-barrera-almaguer.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top