Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Factual Proffer — United States v. Jose Raul Amaro (S.D. Fla.)Search ⌕

Factual Proffer — United States v. Jose Raul Amaro (S.D. Fla.)

Summary

A factual proffer in United States of America v. Jose Raul Amaro, Case No. 22-80118-CR-MIDDLEBROOKS/MATTHEWMAN, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered on the docket November 17, 2022 as Document 111. It states that a PPP application for JR Amaro Flooring, LLC was submitted to Bank of America claiming 23 employees and average monthly payroll of $165,600, when the company had only one employee. It states that the bank transferred $414,000 in PPP funds on or about June 8, 2020, and that the defendant gave co-defendant Yunior Barrera Almaguer blank pre-signed checks and wrote checks at that co-defendant's direction. It states that the defendant received a portion of the funds as payment for a role in the money laundering. The proffer is dated 11-14-2022.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Factual Proffer — United States v. Jose Raul Amaro (S.D. Fla.).” Original at ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-usa-v-barrera-almaguer-et-al-dkt-111-s-d-fla-f357144681/, SHA-256 4e006af1a00ff538d08131eef593f61d2f3cb19a3174c482b3a7d5a1f4720d64.

Full text

Case 9:22-cr-80118-DMM Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 1 of 4




                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                 Case No. 22-80118-CR-MIDDLEBROOKS/MA TTHEWMAN



    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                                 ---• -~t.A•-----
                                                               FILED BY       ~              D.C.
    v.
    JOSE RAUL AMARO,
                                                                      NOV 11 2022
                                                                      ANGELA E. NOBLE
                                                                     CLERK U.S. DIST. CT.
           Defendant.                                                S.O. OF FLA. - W.P.B.



                                     FACTUAL PROFFER

         If this matter had gone to trial , the United States would have proven the following

   facts beyond a reasonable doubt, which occurred in the Southern District of Florida and

   elsewhere:

         The Coronavirus Aid , Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act was a

   federal law enacted in or around March 2020 , designed to provide emergency

   financial assistance to Americans who were suffering the economic effects caused

   by the COVID-19 pandemic. One source of relief provided by the CARES Act was a

   program referred to as the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which authorized

   forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses.

          In order to obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business submitted a PPP loan

   application , which was signed by an authorized representative of the business. The

   PPP loan application required the business to acknowledge the program rules and

   make certain affirmative certifications in order to be eligible to obtain the loan . In the

   PPP loan application , the small business was req uired to provide , among other things,




                                                                          I
Case 9:22-cr-80118-DMM Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 2 of 4

 •
     its average monthly payroll expenses and number of employees, which were used to

     calculate the amount of money the small business was eligible to receive .

           A PPP loan application was processed by a participating lender. If a PPP loan

     application was approved , the participating lender funded the PPP loan using its own

     monies, and the loan was 100% guaranteed by the SBA.          PPP loan proceeds were

     required to be used by the business to pay expenses necessary to continue the

     operations of the business , including the payroll costs of employees, interest on

     mortgages, rent, and utilities. The interest and principal on the PPP loan could be

     entirely forgiven if the business spent the loan proceeds on these expense items within a

     designated period of time and used a defined portion of the loan proceeds on payroll

     expenses.

           On or about June 4 , 2020, JOSE RAUL AMARO allowed the submission of a

     PPP loan application on behalf of his company, JR Amaro Flooring , LLC, to Bank of

     America (BofA).    Specifically, AMARO gave his name, social security number, date

     of birth, mailing address, and email address, and the bank account routing number

     for JR Amaro Flooring to co-defendant Yunior BARRERA ALMAGUER (BARRERA),

     who then had an unindicted co-conspirator use interstate wire communications to

     electronically view and sign a PPP Loan Application Form on behalf of JR Amaro

     Flooring, which falsely represented that the company had 23 employees and an

     average monthly payroll of $165,600 each month . In actuality, JR Amaro Flooring

     had only one employee, AMARO .

           On or about June 8, 2020, based on the false information provided in the loan


                                                2
Case 9:22-cr-80118-DMM Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 3 of 4




   application, the bank approved the loan and transferred $414,000 in PPP funds via

   interstate wire communication to JR Amaro Flooring's account at BofA, for which

   AMARO was the only signatory.       Bank records showed that JR Amaro Flooring's

   bank account at BofA had a balance of approximately $725 on June 5, 2020 , and

   there was no evidence of payroll payments to employees for JR Amaro Flooring prior

   to receipt of the PPP funds.   AMARO discovered that BARRERA had applied for the

   PPP loan on behalf of JR Amaro Flooring and made these false representations, but

   kept the PPP funds.

         BARRERA told AMARO to expect the PPP funds to arrive in AMARO's BofA

   account.   BARRERA instructed AMARO to give him blank, pre-signed checks drawn

   on the account so that BARRERA could access the PPP funds, which AMARO did .

   AMARO also wrote checks on the account at BARRERA's direction.           Between June

   8 and June 25, 2020, AMARO was aware that BARRERA laundered the PPP funds,

   by either writing checks (or directing AMARO to write checks) to entities or individuals

   who were not associated with JR Amaro Flooring, or by making large cash

   withdrawals.   For example, on June 17 and June 24 , 2020, BARRERA directed

   AMARO to write checks in the amounts of $14 ,800 and $11,625 respectively from

   JR Amaro Flooring's BofA account using monies from the PPP loan as described

   above to Company 1, which was controlled by an unindicted co-conspirator.         After

   receiving these checks, Company 1 deposited them in Miami-Dade County into its

   own account at BofA, followed by which Company 1 wrote checks sending the funds

   directly to BARRERA. AMARO also received a portion of the unlawfully obtained


                                              3
Case 9:22-cr-80118-DMM Document 111 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/17/2022 Page 4 of 4




   PPP funds from BARRERA as payment for his role in the money laundering .

           At all times relevant to the offense conduct, Bank of America was a bank the

   deposits of which were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation , and

   which was engaged in, and the activities of which affected , interstate and foreign

   commerce .

           The parties agree that these facts, which do not include all facts known to the

   United States and AMARO , are sufficient to prove the offense to which AMARO is

   pleading guilty.

                                            Respectfully submitted ,

                                           JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ
                                           UNITED STATES ATTORNEY


   Date:    11-14-2022               By:
                                           SUSAN OSBORNE
                                           ASSIA
                                               SThN/ . UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
                                                  I   l       ,.
                                                                   I   .,..,,_..,


                                     By:      l_,,/       ·
                                           OMAR iJOHANSSON
                                           ATTORNEY F R DEFENDANT



                                           JOSE RAUL AMARO
                                           DEFENDANT




                                              4


File and source

File
111-factual-proffer-statement-as-to-jose-raul-amaro.pdf
Size
125,737 bytes
SHA-256
4e006af1a00ff538d08131eef593f61d2f3cb19a3174c482b3a7d5a1f4720d64
Our copy
111-factual-proffer-statement-as-to-jose-raul-amaro.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top