Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court filing — United States v. Tommy Hawkins (Dkt. 6, D.N.J.)Search ⌕

Court filing — United States v. Tommy Hawkins (Dkt. 6, D.N.J.)

Summary

An order filed 05/28/24 as Document 6 in United States of America v. Tommy Hawkins, Case No. 24-cr-358-KMW, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, issued under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and referring to the defendant's initial appearance on the 28th day of May 2024. The order confirms the United States' continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to do so. It states that failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including an order to produce information, a continuance, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions. The signature block names United States District Judge Karen M. Williams.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Court filing — United States v. Tommy Hawkins (Dkt. 6, D.N.J.).” Original at ecf.njd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-united-states-v-tommy-hawkins-dkt-6-d-n-j-0c55b3aa30/, SHA-256 972c5d911364223bd8435f7353bec1a9e73b2dd09b2e05c43f527fbecdbb42e6.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:24-cr-00358-KMW Document6 Filed 05/28/24 Page 1 of 1PagelD: 30

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 24-cr-358-KMW
TOMMY HAWKINS

Defendant.

Pursuant to Rule S5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth on

28 day of May

the record during the initial appearance of the defendant on this

2024, in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel in this matter, the Court
confirms the United States’ continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the
defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to
do so. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited
to, the Court’s order to produce information, the granting of a continuance, the exclusion of

evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions by

Hoh. Karen M. Williams
United States District Judge

File and source

File
gov.uscourts.njd.549157.6.0.pdf
Size
62,728 bytes
SHA-256
972c5d911364223bd8435f7353bec1a9e73b2dd09b2e05c43f527fbecdbb42e6
Our copy
gov.uscourts.njd.549157.6.0.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top