Order Regarding Use of Video Conferencing/Teleconferencing — United States v. Sixtega-Valerio (Document 4)

Summary

A one-page order regarding use of video conferencing/teleconferencing in United States of America v. Jesus Sixtega-Valerio, Mag. No. 21-17041(SAK), in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, filed September 2, 2021 as Document 4 in Case 1:22-cr-00022-KMW. Under Standing Order 2020-06, the court finds that the defendant has consented, after consultation with counsel, to the use of video teleconferencing/teleconferencing for that day's proceeding, above the signature block of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon A. King.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Case 1:22-cr-00022-KMW                Document 4         Filed 09/02/21     Page 1 of 1 PageID: 8




                           IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                             *

                                                     *

        V.                                           *
                                                                CASENO. MAG.NO.21-17041(SAK)
                                                     *

                                                     *
JESUS SIXTEGA-VALERIO
                                                     *



  ORDER REGARDING USE OF VIDEO CONFERENCING/TELECONFERENCING

         In accordance with Standing Order 2020-06, this Court finds:

             That the Defendant (or the Juvenile) has consented to the use of video

teleconferencing/teleconferencing to conduct the proceeding(s) held today, after consultation

with counsel; and

The proceeding(s) held on this date may be conducted by:

  i:zi Video Teleconferencing
  D Teleconferencing, because video teleconferencing is not reasonably available for the
following reason:

             D The Defendant (or the Juvenile) is detained at a facility lacking video
         teleconferencing capability.

             LI Other:




Date:                                                                 LRAAr%%          L
                                                                 SHARON A. KING
                                                                United States Magistrate Judge


File and source

File

4.pdf

Size

59,323 bytes

SHA-256

a7ec6a62bd0e955fab92b7b846d2f2c5776af4663011ed2023a7a1e40934b94b

Our copy

4.pdf

Original

archive.org