Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order of Detention — United States v. Margaryan (C.D. Cal., Document 53)

Order of Detention — United States v. Margaryan (C.D. Cal., Document 53)

Summary

Order of Detention dated May 28, 2025, in United States of America v. Vahe Margaryan, Central District of California, entered after the defendant's initial appearance on the criminal complaint. The Court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required or the safety of any person or the community. On risk of non-appearance it cites unverified and inconsistent background information, a history of foreign travel, apparent access to substantial financial resources, and insufficient bond resources. On danger it cites the allegations in the complaint, alleged threats, and a search of the defendant's residence at the time of arrest that revealed two fully loaded handguns and $20,000 in cash.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order of Detention — United States v. Margaryan (C.D. Cal., Document 53).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-united-states-v-margaryan-dkt-53-c-d-cal-58479b22a7/, SHA-256 8a74e4041efe9b4c77b3ac9ba7d375a6e9d511aa30feeb9c8810c1b2b96810e9.

Full text

     Case 2:25-cr-00458-CV         Document 53   Filed 05/28/25   Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:262

      "
 1
 2
                                                                               FILED
                                                                   CLERK, U.S . DISTRICT COURT
 3
 4                                                                       MAY 28 al!5
 5                                                                CENTRAL DIST. ICT   F CALIFORNIA
                                                                  BY                       DEPUTY
 6
 7
 8
                IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
 9
             FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12                                               Case No. 25-MJ-3132
     UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
13                                               ORDER OF DETENTION
                      Plaintiff,
14
                 V.
15
     VAHEMARGARYAN,
16
17                    Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
     Case 2:25-cr-00458-CV       Document 53      Filed 05/28/25   Page 2 of 5 Page ID #:263


 .
 1                                                I.
 2         On May 28, 2025, Defendant Vahe Margaryan made his initial appearance
 3   on the criminal complaint filed in this case. Defendant was represented by retained
 4   counsel, Michael Zweiback and Lillian Chu. The government was represented by
 5   Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Avies. A detention hearing was held.
 6
 7         □      On motion of the Government [18 U.S.C. § 3142(±)(1)] in a case
 8   allegedly involving a narcotics or controlled substance offense with maximum
 9   sentence of ten or more years.
10                On motion by the Government or on the Court's own motion
11   [18 U.S.C. § 3142(±)(2)] in a case allegedly involving a serious risk that the
12   defendant will flee.
13         The Court concludes that the Government is not entitled to a rebuttable
14   presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure
15   the defendant's appearance as required and the safety or any person or the
16   community [18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(2)].
17                                               II.
18         The Court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will
19   reasonably assure: IX! the appearance of the defendant as required.
20                          IX! the safety of any person or the community.
21                                             III.
22         The Court has considered: (a) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s)
23   charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, a Federal crime of
24   terrorism, or involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive,
25   or destructive device; (b) the weight of evidence against the defendant; (c) the
26   history and characteristics of the defendant; and (d) the nature and seriousness of
27   the danger to any person or the community. [18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)] The Court also
28
     Case 2:25-cr-00458-CV     Document 53      Filed 05/28/25   Page 3 of 5 Page ID #:264



1    considered the information reported by United States Probation and Pretrial

2    Services in the report that was prepared for the Court.
3
4                                            IV.
 5         The Court bases its conclusions on the following:
6          As to risk of non-appearance:
 7         IXl    Certain background information is unverified and inconsistent
 8   (Defendant reports that he lives with his ex-wife and minor children at a residence
 9   that he is the sole owner; but his ex-wife reports that Defendant has been residing
10   at an unknown residence in Sunland, California and occasionally spends the night
11   at their residence; Defendant reports that he has been divorced from his ex-wife for
12   two years but his ex-wife reports that they have been divorced for five years).
13   Neither Defendant nor his ex-wife provided information regarding Defendant's
14   finances, assets or liabilities, mental health or substance use.
15          IXl   History of foreign travel, including travel in 2024 to Armenia
16                use of multiple name variations and aliases, two dates of birth and two
17   social security numbers
18          IXl   Given the allegations in the criminal complaint, indictment, Defendant
19   appears to have access to substantial financial resources, including multiple bank
20   accounts in the names of businesses (shell companies) and other individuals, and
21   caused the proceeds of the alleged fraud to be deposited into, and transferred
22   among, these accounts. The allegations in the complaint include significant
23   transfers of fraud proceeds to foreign countries, including Armenia. Defendant's
24   unwillingness to provide information about his finances suggests that he has access
25   to significant financial resources, including in foreign countries.
26          IXl   Insufficient bond resources: Defendant's proffered surety is a target in
27   the investigation.
28

                                                2
     Case 2:25-cr-00458-CV        Document 53       Filed 05/28/25   Page 4 of 5 Page ID #:265


 1             As to danger to the community:
 2             ~     Seriousness of allegations in the criminal complaint which charges
 3   Defendant with master-minding a fraud conspiracy relating to government claims,
 4   submitting false and fictitious applications for millions of dollars in government
 5   loan relief programs, wire fraud, bank fraud, conspiracy to commit money
 6   laundering and money laundering. The proceeds of the alleged fraud involving
 7   millions of dollars are unaccounted for. Defendant was in the process of obtaining
 8   a fraudulent loan in 2025, indicating that release would pose a continued economic
 9   threat.
10             ~    Defendant is alleged to have threatened an individual who questioned
11   whether the actions Defendant was directing the individual to take were legal, and
12   also threatened another person with a baseball bat and gun.
13             ~    A search of Defendant's residence at the time of his arrest revealed
14   two fully loaded handguns, $20,000 in cash, cash wrappers, a cash counting
15   machines, and a baseball bat, which support a finding that Defendant was involved
16   in laundering money, and threatening others.
17   II
18   II
19   II
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

                                                3
     Case 2:25-cr-00458-CV      Document 53        Filed 05/28/25     Page 5 of 5 Page ID #:266



 1                                           V.
 2
 3         The defendant will be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for
 4   confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from
 5   persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.
 6   The defendant will be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation
 7   with counsel. On order of a Court of the United States or on request of any
 8   attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in
 9   which defendant is confined will deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal
1O   for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.
11   [18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)]
12
     Dated: May 28, 2025
13
                                                                Isl
14                                                    ALKASAGAR
                                              UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

                                               4


File and source

File
53.pdf
Size
298,675 bytes
SHA-256
8a74e4041efe9b4c77b3ac9ba7d375a6e9d511aa30feeb9c8810c1b2b96810e9
Our copy
53.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top