Court filing — United States v. Bock et al. (Feeding Our Future) (Dkt. 743, D. Minn.)

Summary

Order on Motion to Continue Trial in United States of America v. Abdirahman Mohamud Ahmed, Case No. 22-CR-223 (14) (NEB/DTS), Case 0:22-cr-00223-NEB-DTS, in the District of Minnesota, Doc. 743 filed 07/23/25. The Court grants Defendant's Motion to Continue the Trial (ECF No. 740), which sought a three-month continuance, and notes that the Government does not oppose the motion. The order directs the defendant to provide a status update to the Court and Government by October 20, 2025 and sets a status conference on October 23, 2025 at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 13W. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), it excludes the time from July 23, 2025 until October 23, 2025 from the Speedy Trial Act computations. It is dated July 23, 2025 and signed s/Nancy E. Brasel.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

           CASE 0:22-cr-00223-NEB-DTS         Doc. 743     Filed 07/23/25    Page 1 of 2




                                UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                   DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA



    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                          Case No. 22-CR-223 (14) (NEB/DTS)

                   Plaintiff,

    v.                                                      ORDER ON MOTION TO
                                                              CONTINUE TRIAL
    ABDIRAHMAN MOHAMUD AHMED,

                   Defendant.



            This matter is before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion to Continue the Trial in

this case. (ECF No. 740.) Defendant filed a motion for a three-month continuance of the

proceedings in this case and requests a new trial date to allow the Defendant additional time

to prepare for trial. Counsel signed a statement of facts (ECF No. 741) indicating that the size

and scope of this case warrant the additional time needed to prepare for trial. The motion

indicates new counsel has met and conferred with Defendant and he supports the extension

request. The Government does not oppose the motion.

         Upon review of the motion, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Continue the

Trial in this case for Defendant Abdirahman Mohamud Ahmed. Defendant shall provide a

status update to the Court and Government by October 20, 2025. Defendant shall

communicate whether the Defendant is ready to proceed to trial or more time is needed

before setting a new trial date. The Court also sets a status conference with both parties and
           CASE 0:22-cr-00223-NEB-DTS        Doc. 743     Filed 07/23/25      Page 2 of 2




the Defendant on October 23, 2025 at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 13W of the Minneapolis Federal

Courthouse. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that, for the reasons stated

in the Defendant’s motion and statement of facts, the ends of justice served by the granting

of such a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy

trial.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time from July 23, 2025 until October 23, 2025 is

excluded from the Speedy Trial Act computations pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).


 Dated: July 23, 2025                          BY THE COURT:
                                               s/Nancy E. Brasel
                                               Nancy E. Brasel
                                               United States District Judge




                                                2


File and source

File

743.pdf

Size

111,660 bytes

SHA-256

14bed44ad4139185e70e88757e25aba41c65eb9f9d0ea8f89266c8f5b66b4348

Our copy

743.pdf

Original

archive.org