Defendant Aimee Bock's Motion in Limine No. 7 — United States v. Bock (D. Minn., Doc. 447)
Summary
Defendant Aimee Bock's Motion in Limine No. 7, filed 01/13/25 as Doc. 447 in United States v. Aimee Marie Bock (1), Criminal No. 22-CR-223 (NEB/DTS), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota. Through counsel Kenneth Udoibok, Bock asks the court to bar the government from offering undisclosed expert opinions. She lists topics on which she says no expert was disclosed, including vendor profit and food costs under the food program, how many meals or children a site could serve, sponsors' legal obligations and the adequacy of Feeding Our Future's policies and procedures. She argues that these are matters of expert opinion that require disclosure before trial. She also reserves the right to file more motions in limine. The motion is dated January 13, 2025.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Defendant Aimee Bock's Motion in Limine No. 7 — United States v. Bock (D. Minn., Doc. 447).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-united-states-v-bock-et-al-feeding-our-future-dkt-447-d-m-1d4ac288c9/
, SHA-256 1651b8680b51bcce0ecbea52e8ca121ff6f1a20b054d792cb4356e75c0311164.Full text
CASE 0:22-cr-00223-NEB-DTS Doc. 447 Filed 01/13/25 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CRIMINAL NO: 22-CR-223 (NEB/DTS)
United States of America,
Plaintiff, DEFENDANT AIMEE BOCK’S
MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 7
vs.
Aimee Marie Bock (1),
Defendant.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Aimee Marie Bock (hereinafter “Defendant”), through her counsel,
Kenneth Udoibok, respectfully moves this Court to preclude the Government from
introducing certain evidence and making certain arguments. Bock reserves the right to
file additional motions in limini once she has reviewed the Government’s recently
produced witnesses and exhibits list.
MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 7
(undisclosed expert testimony)
The Government should be precluded from offering any undisclosed expert
opinions. For example, the Government did not disclose any experts or analysis about: (i)
how much profit vendors and distributors could reasonably anticipate making on the food
program; (ii) how much vendors and distributors can reasonably expect to pay for the
food that qualifies for reimbursable meals under the food program; (iii) how much
vendors and distributors can reasonably expect to incur in overhead costs to participate in
1
CASE 0:22-cr-00223-NEB-DTS Doc. 447 Filed 01/13/25 Page 2 of 2
the food program; (iv) how many meals a site could reasonably expect to serve in a given
day; (v) how many children a site could reasonably expect to serve; (vi) the legal
responsibilities and obligations of sponsors; or (vii) the adequacy of Feeding Our Future’s
policies and procedures. Those are matters of expert opinion and beyond the common
experience of lay people and require disclosure before they can be admitted at trial.
The Government should be precluded from offering any opinion testimony not timely
disclosed.
Respectfully Submitted
KENNETH UBONG UDOIBOK, P.A.
January 13, 2025 /s/Kenneth U. Udoibok
Kenneth U. Udoibok (#0262523)
Flour Exchange Building, Suite
5010 310 Fourth Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Phone: (612) 808-6031
k@kenulaw.com
ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT
AIMEE MARIE BOCK
2
File and source
- File
- 447.pdf
- Size
- 122,516 bytes
- SHA-256
- 1651b8680b51bcce0ecbea52e8ca121ff6f1a20b054d792cb4356e75c0311164
- Our copy
- 447.pdf
- Original
- archive.org