Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Aimee Marie Bock (District of Minnesota, Doc. 784)
Summary
Preliminary Order of Forfeiture in United States of America v. Aimee Marie Bock, Case No. 22-CR-223 (1) (NEB/DTS), Case 0:22-cr-00223-NEB-DTS, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, Doc. 784 filed 12/30/25. The order recites the Jury's verdict of Guilty on Counts 1, 2, 4, 5, 12, 15, and 40 of the Indictment and grants the United States' Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (ECF No. 780). It forfeits listed property under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), including $3,506,066.80 seized from a Bank of America account, $6,347.85 and $179,455.87 seized from US Bank accounts, a 2013 Porsche Panamera, and $13,462.00 in U.S. Currency, and enters a money judgment forfeiture of $5,241,522.79. The order says it becomes final as to the defendant at sentencing and is dated December 30, 2025, with the signature s/Nancy E. Brasel.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Aimee Marie Bock (District of Minnesota, Doc. 784).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-united-states-v-bock-dkt-784-d-minn-8b1dac5bfb/
, SHA-256 1c3ee229b21d8f30137e0a05e8d6010727712743a919d3b3ca58ea000822575f.Full text
CASE 0:22-cr-00223-NEB-DTS Doc. 784 Filed 12/30/25 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 22‐CR‐223 (1) (NEB/DTS)
Plaintiff,
v. PRELIMINARY ORDER OF
FORFEITURE
AIMEE MARIE BOCK,
Defendant.
Based on the United States’ Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture; on the
Indictment; on the evidence admitted at trial in this matter; on the Jury’s verdict of Guilty
on Counts 1, 2, 4, 5, 12, 15, and 40 of the Indictment; on the Declaration of Pauline Roase;
and on the Court having found that certain property is subject to forfeiture pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) in conjunction with 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), the United States has
established the requisite nexus between such property and the offenses to which the
Defendant has been found guilty, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The United States’ Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (ECF
No. 780) is GRANTED;
2. The following property is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 18 U.S.C. 981(a)(1)(C) in conjunction with 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c):
CASE 0:22-cr-00223-NEB-DTS Doc. 784 Filed 12/30/25 Page 2 of 3
a. $3,506,066.80 seized from Bank of America account No.
374004673156, held in the name of Feeding Our Future DBA
Teaching Our Future;
b. $6,347.85 seized from US Bank, account No. 104791224223, held in
the name of Aimee Bock;
c. $179,455.87 seized from US Bank, account No. 204788895306, held in
the name of Aimee Bock;
d. 2013 Porsche Panamera, VIN: WP0AA2A79DL015044, registered to
Aimee Bock;
e. $13,462.00 in U.S. Currency seized from Aimee Bock on January 20,
2022;
f. Miscellaneous electronics seized from 3055 Old Highway 8, St.
Anthony, Minnesota, on January 20, 2022, as described in the
attached Appendix;
g. Miscellaneous clothing, accessories and jewelry seized from 13299
Bronze Parkway, Rosemount, Minnesota (the residence of AIMEE
BOCK), on January 20, 2022, as described in the attached Appendix;
and
h. Miscellaneous electronics seized from 13299 Bronze Parkway,
Rosemount, Minnesota (the residence of AIMEE BOCK), on January
20, 2022, as described in the attached Appendix.
3. A money judgment forfeiture is entered against Defendant Aimee Marie
Bock pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) in the
amount $5,241,522.79;
4. Defendant Bock shall receive a credit against the money judgment
forfeiture for the net forfeited value of each asset that is forfeited from her
in connection with this case;
5. Defendant Bock is ordered to forfeit, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C),
28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2)(C), any property, real or
2
CASE 0:22-cr-00223-NEB-DTS Doc. 784 Filed 12/30/25 Page 3 of 3
personal, constituting or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or
indirectly, as a result of the fraud scheme and conspiracy alleged in Counts
1, 2, 4, 5, 12 of the Indictment;
6. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3) and (c)(1)(B), and 21 U.S.C. § 853(m),
the United States may conduct discovery as to Defendant Bock to identify
property subject to forfeiture under the terms of this order and to address
any factual issues raised by a third‐party petition filed pursuant to Fed. R.
Crim. P. 32.2(c);
7. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(4)(A) and (B), this Preliminary Order of
Forfeiture shall become final as to the defendant at the time of sentencing,
and shall be made a part of the sentence and included in the judgment; and
8. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend it as
necessary pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(e).
Dated: December 30, 2025 BY THE COURT:
s/Nancy E. Brasel
Nancy E. Brasel
United States District Judge
3
File and source
- File
- 784.pdf
- Size
- 119,150 bytes
- SHA-256
- 1c3ee229b21d8f30137e0a05e8d6010727712743a919d3b3ca58ea000822575f
- Our copy
- 784.pdf
- Original
- archive.org