Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Court Minutes, Criminal Motion Hearing — United States v. Bock et al. (D. Minn., Doc. 271)Search ⌕

Court Minutes, Criminal Motion Hearing — United States v. Bock et al. (D. Minn., Doc. 271)

Summary

Court Minutes for a Criminal Motion Hearing on March 11, 2024, filed 03/11/24 as Doc. 271 in United States v. Aimee Marie Bock et al., Case No. 22-cr-223 (NEB/TNL), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, before U.S. Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung. The minutes list nine defendants, their counsel and the government attorneys Chelsea A. Walcker, Harry Jacobs and Joseph H. Thompson, and a total hearing time of 1 hour and 52 minutes. They record that Ahmed Mohamed Artan and his counsel did not appear, that Salim Ahmed Said withdrew a request to join a motion, and that the court asked for post-hearing briefing and a joint letter by March 18. An order and an R&R are to be issued.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Court Minutes, Criminal Motion Hearing — United States v. Bock et al. (D. Minn., Doc. 271).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-united-states-v-bock-dkt-271-d-minn-eb24a7d284/, SHA-256 588d3fc183a46c047d1d1379f959cf66605f0e89b3187037a488a785e1844b20.

Full text

               CASE 0:22-cr-00223-NEB-TNL Doc. 271 Filed 03/11/24 Page 1 of 2


                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

                                  CRIMINAL MOTION HEARING
                                                                    COURT MINUTES
United States of America,                                          BEFORE: Tony N. Leung
                                                                    U.S. Magistrate Judge
                     Plaintiff,
                                                      Case No:        22-cr-223 (NEB/TNL)
v.                                                    Date:           March 11, 2024
                                                      Court Reporter: Renee Rogge
Aimee Marie Bock (1),                                 Courthouse:     Minneapolis
Salim Ahmed Said (3),                                 Courtroom:      9W
Abdulkadir Nur Salah (4),                             Time: 10:46 a.m.-12:08 p.m.
Abdi Nur Salah (6),                                            12:34 p.m.-1:04 p.m.
Abdihakim Ali Ahmed (7).                              Total Time in Court: 1 Hour & 52 Minutes
Ahmed Mohamed Artan (8),                              Sealed Hearing Time: N/A
Abdikadir Ainanshe Mohamud (9),
Ahmed Abdullahi Ghedi (13), and
Abdirahman Mohamud Ahmed (14),

                     Defendants.


APPEARANCES:
 Plaintiff:    Chelsea A. Walcker, Harry Jacobs, and Joseph H. Thompson, United States Attorney’s Office
 Defendant Aimee Marie Bock (1): Kenneth U. Udoibok, Kenneth Ubong Udoibok, P.A.
                                     ☐ FPD ☐ CJA ☒ Retained ☐ Appointed
 Defendant Salim Ahmed Said (3): Adrian Scott LaFavor-Montez, Colich & Associates
                                     ☐ FPD ☐ CJA ☒ Retained ☐ Appointed
 Defendant Abdulkadir Nur Salah (4):        Surya Saxena, Greene Espel PLLP
                                             ☐ FPD ☐ CJA ☒ Retained ☐ Appointed
 Defendant Abdi Nur Salah (6):       Brian N. Toder, Chestnut Cambronne PA
                                     ☐ FPD ☐ CJA ☒ Retained ☐ Appointed
 Defendant Abdihakim Ali Ahmed (7):         JaneAnne Murray, Murray Law LLC
                                             ☐ FPD ☐ CJA ☒ Retained ☐ Appointed
 Defendant Ahmed Mohamed Artan (8):         No appearance
 Defendant Abdikadir Ainanshe Mohamud (9):       Robert A. Lengeling, Law Office of Robert A. Lengeling,
                                                 PLLC
                                                 ☐ FPD ☒ CJA ☐ Retained ☐ Appointed
 Defendant Ahmed Abdullahi Ghedi (13):      Glenn P. Bruder, Mitchell, Bruder & Johnson
                                             ☐ FPD ☒ CJA ☐ Retained ☐ Appointed
 Defendant Abdirahman Mohamud Ahmed (14):          Peter B. Wold, Wold Morrison Law
                                                   ☐ FPD ☒ CJA ☐ Retained ☐ Appointed
                   CASE 0:22-cr-00223-NEB-TNL Doc. 271 Filed 03/11/24 Page 2 of 2


NON-DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS HEARD: 187, 190, 195, 196, 197, 200 as it relates to 194,
                               202, 204, 206, 208, 209, 214, 217, 219, 220

DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS HEARD:                                        194, 203, 207, 221


REMARKS:
Defendant Ahmed Mohamed Artan (8) and his counsel did not appear. At the hearing, the Government advised
that Defendant Ahmed Mohamed Artan (8) had filed a letter withdrawing his request to join certain motions of
his co-defendants. See ECF No. 265; see also ECF No. 264.

At the hearing, the Court noted that Defendant Asad Mohamed Abshir (11) previously requested that he be
excused from this hearing and that his motion be determined on the papers and taken under advisement at the
same time as the Court takes other non-dispositive motions filed under advisement following this hearing, and
that this request had been granted. ECF No. 251; see also ECF No. 211.

At the hearing, Salim Ahmed Said withdrew his request to join in Defendant Abdulkadir Nur Salah (4)’s
Motion to Define the Scope of the Prosecution Team and Request Require Disclosures, ECF No. 190.

As for any post-hearing briefing, the Court specifically sought briefing from Defendant Abdulkadir Nur Salah
(4) and the Government. The parties were further directed to submit a joint letter on or before Monday,
March 18, either affirmatively stating that no additional briefing will be needed or proposing a joint post-
hearing briefing schedule to include the motions that are before this Court and the motions that are before
Magistrate Judge Cowan Wright. Any proposed briefing schedule should specifically identify those motions for
which briefing will be submitted and take into account the preparation of any hearing transcripts to the extent
such transcripts are needed.


☒ORDER TO BE ISSUED ☐NO ORDER TO BE ISSUED                           ☒R&R TO BE ISSUED ☐ NO R&R TO BE ISSUED
☒ Exhibits retained by the Court ☐ Exhibits returned to counsel




                                                                                   s/Emily
                                                                             Law Clerk to Magistrate Judge Leung


File and source

File
271.pdf
Size
177,047 bytes
SHA-256
588d3fc183a46c047d1d1379f959cf66605f0e89b3187037a488a785e1844b20
Our copy
271.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top