Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation — United States v. Leticia Arceneaux (Document 20)

Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation — United States v. Leticia Arceneaux (Document 20)

Summary

Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, Document 20, filed 04/28/25, in Case 5:25-cr-00172-XR, Western District of Texas, San Antonio Division, against Leticia Arceneaux. It states that the Court referred the administration of the guilty plea and allocution to the Magistrate Judge, that Defendant consented, and that the Court finds the Memorandum and Recommendation neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. It orders that the Memorandum and Recommendation be accepted and that the guilty plea is ACCEPTED. The order is dated the 28th day of April, 2025, and its signature block names Xavier Rodriguez, United States District Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order Accepting Magistrate Judge's Recommendation — United States v. Leticia Arceneaux (Document 20).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-united-states-v-arceneaux-dkt-20-w-d-tex-f5068a5a6c/, SHA-256 3323e82a2bb325c3171ef020f11e501fbeea2d3830b9f806187b847e653c2264.

Full text

        Case 5:25-cr-00172-XR         Document 20        Filed 04/28/25     Page 1 of 2




                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                            SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                       §
                                               §
vs.                                            §      NO: SA:25-CR-00172(1)-XR
                                               §
(1) LETICIA ARCENEAUX                          §


         ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

       On this date came on to be considered the Memorandum and Recommendation of the

United States Magistrate Judge, filed in the above-styled and numbered cause. Pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §636(b), this Court referred to the Magistrate Judge the administration of Defendant's

guilty plea and allocution under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. See United

States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir. 1997). Defendant consented to the administration of the

guilty plea and allocution by the Magistrate Judge.

       The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation and finds it to be neither

clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Accordingly,

       IT IS ORDERED that the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge filed in this cause be and is accepted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) such

that Defendant's guilty plea is ACCEPTED.

       Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations

must serve and file his written objections within ten days after being served with a copy of them.

If objections are filed within fourteen (14) days, this order will be rescinded and the Court may

conduct a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de

novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and
        Case 5:25-cr-00172-XR       Document 20       Filed 04/28/25   Page 2 of 2




recommendations to which objection is made.").

       IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of April, 2025.




                                                 ______________________________
                                                 XAVIER RODRIGUEZ
                                                 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

File and source

File
20.pdf
Size
124,280 bytes
SHA-256
3323e82a2bb325c3171ef020f11e501fbeea2d3830b9f806187b847e653c2264
Our copy
20.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top