Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment — United States v. Scher, 22 Cr. 320 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y.)
Summary
Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, Document 41, filed 01/18/24, in Case 7:22-cr-00320-PMH, concerning Elizier Scher. It recites that on or about February 1, 2023, Scher was charged in a one-count Superseding Information with theft of public funds, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, and pleaded guilty to Count One pursuant to a plea agreement. Scher agreed to forfeit, and consents to a money judgment of, $1,648,900 representing proceeds traceable to Count One. The order is final as to Scher and is deemed part of the sentence, and the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment — United States v. Scher, 22 Cr. 320 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-s-d-n-y-no-7-22-cr-00320-dkt-41-s-d-n-y-fd6db67aea/
, SHA-256 8409e8fe87c4aa25e9cf30dcad6c82eac3b98bc55883530c9e50ec9ff3ba1df5.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
Case 7:22-cr-00320-PMH Document 41 Filed 01/18/24 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER ~Ve- OF FORFEITURE/ : MONEY JUDGMENT ELIZIER SCHER, S122 Cr. 320 (PMH) Defendant. WHEREAS, on or about February 1, 2023, ELIZIER SCHER (the “Defendant”), was charged in a one-count Superseding Information, $1 22 Cr. 320 (PMH) (the “Information’”), with theft of public funds, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 641; WHEREAS, the Superseding Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461, of all property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Superseding Information; WHEREAS, on or about February 1, 2023, the Defendant pleaded guilty to Count One of the Superseding Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461, a sum of money equal to $1,648,900 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One; WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $1,648,900 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable Case 7:22-cr-00320-PMH Document 41 Filed 01/18/24 Page 2 of 4 to the offense charged in Count One of the Superseding Information that the Defendant personally obtained; and WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Superseidng Information that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney James McMahon, and the Defendant, and his counsel, Andrew Goldstein, Esq.; Michael Berkovits, Esq; Susan Necheles, Esq; and Gedalia Stern, Esq., that: 1, As a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Superseding Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $1,648,900 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant. 2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, ELIZIER SCHER, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith. 3, All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Case 7:22-cr-00320-PMH Document 41 Filed 01/18/24 Page 3 of 4 Andrew’s Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant’s name and case number. 4, The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property. 5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment. 6, Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney’s Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas. 7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Case 7:22-cr-00320-PMH Document 41 Filed 01/18/24 Page 4 of 4 8, The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument. AGREED AND CONSENTED TO: DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York JAMES/MCMAHON DATEL Assistant United States Attorney 50 Main Street, Suite 1100 White Plains, NY 10606 (914) 993-1936 ELIZIER SCHER | By: Clin. g —_ / / 7/ 2Y ELIZIER SCHER DATE (Ktorney for Defendant DATE SO ORDERED: HONORABLE PHILIP M. HALPERN DATE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
File and source
- File
- 41.pdf
- Size
- 117,111 bytes
- SHA-256
- 8409e8fe87c4aa25e9cf30dcad6c82eac3b98bc55883530c9e50ec9ff3ba1df5
- Our copy
- 41.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.