Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment — United States v. Alicia Ayers (Document 98)
Summary
This is a Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment against Alicia Ayers in 21 Cr. 440(NSR)-01, filed 12/12/23. It recites that she was charged in a four-count Indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, false statements and aggravated identity theft, and that on or about March 7, 2023 she pled guilty to Counts One through Three. She consents to a money judgment of $1,690,000 in United States currency, representing proceeds traceable to Counts One and Two that she personally obtained, for which she is jointly and severally liable with co-defendants Andrea Ayers and Traci Proctor. Payments go to the United States Marshals Service, and the United States may seek substitute assets under Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment — United States v. Alicia Ayers (Document 98).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-s-d-n-y-no-7-21-cr-00440-dkt-98-s-d-n-y-bfdb58b8fc/
, SHA-256 8ba3ad6885a91e395a8f75c1018b92db72618b7c786c3d1ce71451e930938c7e.Full text
Case 7:21-cr-00440-NSR Document 98 Filed 12/12/23 Page 1 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 12/12/2023
X
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER
- V. - OF FORFEITURE/
MONEY JUDGMENT
ALICIA AYERS,
21 Cr. 440(NSR)-01
Defendant.
X
WHEREAS, on or about July 6, 2021, ALICIA AYERS (the “Defendant”), and
another, was charged in a four-count Indictment, 21 Cr. 440 (NSR)(the “Indictment”), with
conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation ofTitle 18, United States Code,Section 1349(Count
One); wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2(Count Two);
false statements, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1001(a)(2) and 2(Count
Three); and aggravated identity theft, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections
1028A(a)(l)and 2(a)(Count Four);
WHEREAS,the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One and
Two ofthe Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States
Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any and all
property, real and personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the
commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment, including but not
limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable
to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment;
WHEREAS,on or about March 7, 2023, the Defendant pled guilty to Counts One
through Three of the Indictment;
Case 7:21-cr-00440-NSR Document 98 Filed 12/12/23 Page 2 of 5
WHEREAS. pursuant to an agreement with the Government, wherein the
Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Counts One and Two of the Indictment
and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18. United States Code. Section
981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28. United States Code. Section 2461(c). a sum of money equal to
$1,690,000 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the
commission of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment;
WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the
amount of$1.690.000 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to
the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment that the Defendant personally
obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with co-defendants Andrea Ayers
and Traci Proctor (the "Co-defendants"), to the extent a forfeiture money judgment is entered
against the Co-defendants in this case; and
WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the
Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the
Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due
diligence.
IT IS 1 lEREB Y STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States
of America, by its attorney Damian Williams, United States Attorney. Assistant United States
Attorneys Jeffrey C. Coffman and Courtney Heavy,ofcounsel, and the Defendant and her counsel.
Deveraux Cannick. Esq., that:
As a result of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the
Indictment, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of SI.690,000 in
United Slates currency (the "Money Judgment")- representing the amount of proceeds traceable to
Case 7:21-cr-00440-NSR Document 98 Filed 12/12/23 Page 3 of 5
the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment that the Defendant personally
obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with the Co-defendants, to the
extent a forfeiture money judgment is entered against the Co-defendants in this case, shall be
entered against the Defendant.
9 Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this
Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiturc/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant ALICIA
AYERS, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the
judgment of conviction therewith.
3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal
money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals
Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's OfTice. Southern District of New
York, Attn; Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit. One St. Andrew's
Plaza. New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.
4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments
on the Money Judgment into the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear
title to such forfeited property.
5. Pursuant to Title 21. United States Code. Section 853(p), the United States
is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount
of the Money Judgment.
6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the
United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate
or dispose of forfeitable properly, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production
of documents and the issuance ofsubpoenas.
Case 7:21-cr-00440-NSR Document 98 Filed 12/12/23 Page 4 of 5
7. The Court shall retain jurisdiciion to enforce this Consent Preliminar>' Order
of Korleilure/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal
Rules of Criminal Procedure.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONAI.LY LEFT BLANK]
Case 7:21-cr-00440-NSR Document 98 Filed 12/12/23 Page 5 of 5
8. The sij£nature page of this Consent >*0:11111113^ Order of Forfeiiurt/Mone>’
Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deoned an onginal
but all of which together w ill cOTStilutc one and the same instrument.
AGREF-D AND CONSENTED TO;
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
10/24/23
By;
JEFFREY C. COFFMAN DATE
COURTNEY HEAVY
Assistant United Stales Anomeys
One SL Andrew’s Plaza
New York, NY 10007
(914)993-1940/(214)637-2413
ALICIA AYERS
I
/
-●v
By:
-ALICIA AYERS DATC ‘
I
DEVERAUX CANNICK, ESQ. DATE
Attorney for Defendant
69-06 Grand Avenue
Maspeth. NY 11378
SO ORDERED;
12/12/2023
HONORABLE NELSON S. ROMAN DATE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
File and source
- File
- 98.pdf
- Size
- 258,489 bytes
- SHA-256
- 8ba3ad6885a91e395a8f75c1018b92db72618b7c786c3d1ce71451e930938c7e
- Our copy
- 98.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.