Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Court filing — S.D.N.Y. No. 7:19-cr-00844 (Dkt. 139, S.D.N.Y.)

Court filing — S.D.N.Y. No. 7:19-cr-00844 (Dkt. 139, S.D.N.Y.)

Full text

           Case 7:19-cr-00844-CS Document 139 Filed 07/27/23 Page 1 of 2




UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------X

United States of America,                                                 No. 19-CR-844 (CS)

                                                                       XXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                                       7:19-CV-844 (CS)
                              v.
                                                                             ORDER

Ameet Goyal,
                                             Defendant.
---------------------------------------------------------------X
CATHY SEIBEL, United States District Judge:

        On July 25, 2023, the Finance Department issued a deficiency notice on the ECF docket

stating: “Incorrect Payment Type received by the Finance Department on 07/25/2023, Payment

will be held by the Finance Office pending further order of the Court.” Defendant was

attempting to pay the filing fee for his appeal, but a personal check is not an acceptable form of

payment for that purpose.

        The filing fee may be paid in person by credit card or cash at the Courthouse at 500 Pearl

Street, New York, New York, or by credit card at the Courthouse at 300 Quarropas Street, White

Plains, New York. Otherwise, the fee must be paid by certified check or money order, payable

to “Clerk of Court – SDNY,” and mailed to: Cashiers Unit – Room 260, 500 Pearl Street, New

York, NY 10007. Any certified check or money order must include Defendant’s case number,

19-CR-844 (CS).

                                               CONCLUSION

        The Clerk of Court is directed to return the Defendant his personal check for $505.00. If

Defendant wishes to pursue his appeal, he must submit the fee using one of the acceptable forms

of payment described above.
          Case 7:19-cr-00844-CS Document 139 Filed 07/27/23 Page 2 of 2




       The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would

not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf.

Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates

good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue.


SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2023
       White Plains, New York

                                                           ________________________________
                                                                    CATHY SEIBEL
                                                               United States District Judge


File and source

File
139.pdf
Size
62,489 bytes
SHA-256
054dc6fe1b3ecb1f195cf968f3248ec5a812be4ece0128115233fb335c415ef4
Our copy
139.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top