Order, Defense Expert Witness David Duhaime, Curriculum Vitae — United States v. Ali Rashan (Dkt. 51)
Summary
Order, Document 51, filed 04/03/26, in Case 1:25-cr-00283-PAE, United States of America v. Ali Rashan, by District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The Court notes that the defense submitted Mr. Duhaime's curriculum vitae (CV), which the defense acknowledges was not appended to the expert report (Dkt. 50), after the completion of briefing on the Government's pending motion to exclude defense expert witness David Duhaime. The Court directs the Government to file a letter addressing whether the defense had previously furnished the CV to the Government, whether the CV may properly be considered on the pending motion, and the Government's assessment if it is considered. The letter is due Monday, April 6, 2026, after which the Court will determine how to proceed, including whether to convene a Daubert hearing.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order, Defense Expert Witness David Duhaime, Curriculum Vitae — United States v. Ali Rashan (Dkt. 51).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-s-d-n-y-no-1-25-cr-00283-dkt-51-s-d-n-y-2082eb36ef/
, SHA-256 68703f0a8b2f219de0925720cf7dbc75cd42ef12b0cf522af2e54d18cad26c22.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors. Page 2 of 2 is not shown because the text could not be recognized reliably.
Case 1:25-cr-00283-PAE Document51 Filed 04/03/26 Page1of2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ~v- 25 CR. 283 (PAE) ALI RASHAN, - ORDER Defendant. PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: The defense late yesterday submitted—well after the completion of briefing on the Government’s pending motion to exclude defense expert witness David Duhaime— Mr. Duhaime’s curriculum vitae (CV), which the defense acknowledges was not appended to his expert report. Dkt. 50. The defense filed this submission in response to the Court’s order yesterday noting that, in contrast to the Government’s expert witnesses, there was no reference to such a CV in Mr. Duhaime’s expert report. Dkt. 48. The Court directs the Government to file a letter addressing (1) whether the defense had otherwise previously furnished Mr. Duhaime’s CV to the Government, and if so, when and by what means; (2) if not, whether Mr. Duhaime’s CV may properly be considered on the pending motion to exclude his testimony, given that it was first submitted after the completion of briefing; and (3) if the CV is considered, the Government’s assessment of it. The Government’s letter is due Monday, April 6, 2026. Upon review of that letter, the Court will determine how to proceed, including whether to convene a Daubert hearing as to Mr. Duhaime.
File and source
- File
- 51.pdf
- Size
- 81,842 bytes
- SHA-256
- 68703f0a8b2f219de0925720cf7dbc75cd42ef12b0cf522af2e54d18cad26c22
- Our copy
- 51.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.