Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order: Pro Se Motions Seeking to Relieve Trial Counsel — United States v. Alvin Maxwell (Dkt. 246, S.D.N.Y.)

Order: Pro Se Motions Seeking to Relieve Trial Counsel — United States v. Alvin Maxwell (Dkt. 246, S.D.N.Y.)

Summary

Order, Document 246, filed 03/09/23, in 21-CR-247-04 (PAE), United States of America v. Alvin Maxwell, by District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. The Court states that it has received a series of pro se motions (Dkt. 245) from Alvin Maxwell seeking to relieve trial counsel Peter Brill, Esq., and thereafter to proceed pro se, presumably with an appeal to the Second Circuit. The Court directs Mr. Brill to respond in writing within one week, addressing whether a timely notice of appeal has been filed, the status of any appeal, and Mr. Brill's perspective on Mr. Maxwell's application. The order is marked SO ORDERED and dated March 9, 2023.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order: Pro Se Motions Seeking to Relieve Trial Counsel — United States v. Alvin Maxwell (Dkt. 246, S.D.N.Y.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-s-d-n-y-no-1-21-cr-00247-dkt-246-s-d-n-y-9979bbb08a/, SHA-256 34bb3a9ac484bfaecc4b33f5cba9d2d5d9fa6a5837b0addb33013fa714464ef7.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:21-cr-00247-PAE Document 246 Filed 03/09/23 Page 1of1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
21-CR-247-04 (PAE)

ORDER
ALVIN MAXWELL,

Defendant.

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge:

The Court has received a series of pro se motions (Dkt. 245) from defendant Alvin
Maxwell seeking to relieve trial counsel Peter Brill, Esq., and thereafter to proceed pro se,
presumably with an appeal to the Second Circuit. The Court directs Mr. Brill to respond in
writing within one week, including addressing (1) whether a timely notice of appeal has been
filed, (2) what the status, if any, is as to any appeal, and (3) Mr. Brill’s perspective on Mr.
Maxwell’s application, including whether there are colorable arguments to be pursued on appeal

and whether Mr. Maxwell would be prejudiced were he to proceed pro se on appeal.

SO ORDERED.

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER V
United States District Judge

Dated: March 9, 2023
New York, New York

File and source

File
246.pdf
Size
120,372 bytes
SHA-256
34bb3a9ac484bfaecc4b33f5cba9d2d5d9fa6a5837b0addb33013fa714464ef7
Our copy
246.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top