Plea Agreement — United States v. Tracy Kirkland (Southern District of Georgia, Document 18)
Summary
A Plea Agreement filed March 19, 2021, in United States v. Tracy Kirkland, Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Statesboro Division (Document 18). Defendant agrees to enter a plea of guilty to Count One of the Information, which charges Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), and the agreement states facts about false loan applications to the SBA for an EIDL and to Financial Institution 1 for a PPP loan. It lists a maximum possible sentence of 20 years' imprisonment, and the parties agree to recommend a loss amount of more than $40,000 but less than $95,000. Defendant also agrees to an Order of Forfeiture reflecting a money judgment in the amount of $66,400. A closing order states that the plea of guilty is accepted and the Plea Agreement ratified and confirmed.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Plea Agreement — United States v. Tracy Kirkland (Southern District of Georgia, Document 18).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-s-d-ga-no-6-21-cr-00002-dkt-18-acabbbc59a/
, SHA-256 db00a048d13e834e5a3c52c648937892a0bec5e47286c63213eb67c86219cec3.Full text
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 1 of 18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
V. CR:
TRACY KIRKLAND
PLEA AGREEMENT
Defendant Tracy Kirkland, represented by her counsel Malone Hart, and the
United States of America, represented by Assistant United States Attorney Steven
H. Lee, have reached a plea agreement in this case. The terms and conditions of that
agreement are as follows.
I. Guilty Plea
Defendant, having been advised of the right to be charged by Indictment,
agrees to waive that right and enter a plea of guilty to Count One of the Information,
which charges Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343).
2. Elements and Factual Basis
The elements necessary to prove the offense charged in Count One are (1) the
Defendant knowingly devised or participated in a scheme to defraud, or to obtain
money or property by using false pretenses, representations, or promises;(2)the false
pretenses, representations, or promises were about a material fact;(3) the Defendant
acted with the intent to defraud; and (4) the Defendant transmitted or caused to be
transmitted by wire some communication in interstate commerce to help carry out
the scheme to defraud.
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 2 of 18
Defendant agrees that she is, in fact, guilty of this offense. She agrees to the
accuracy of the following facts, which satisfy each of the offense's required elements:
At all times relevant to this case:
Financial Institution 1 was a federally insured financial institution based in
Georgia. Financial Institution 1 was an SBA Preferred Lender and participated as a
PPP lender to small businesses.
The Small Business Administration and the CARES Act
The United States Small Business Administration ("SBA") was an executive-
branch agency of the United States government that provided support to
entrepreneurs and small businesses. The mission of the SBA was to maintain and
strengthen the nation's economy by enabling the establishment and viability of small
businesses and by assisting in the economic recovery of communities after disasters.
As part of this effort, the SBA enabled and provided for loans through banks,
credit unions, and other lenders that had government-backed guarantees. The SBA
also provided direct loans.
In or around March 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
("CARES")Act was enacted to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions
of Americans suffering adverse economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The CARES Act established several new temporary programs and provided for
expansion of others, including programs created and/or administered by the SBA.
-xx.
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 3 of 18
The Paycheck Protection Prosfram
One source of relief provided by the CARES Act was the authorization of up to
$349 billion in forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other
expenses,through a program referred to as the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP").
In or around April 2020, Congress authorized over $300 billion in additional PPP
funding.
In order to obtain a PPP loan, a qualifjdng business was required to submit a
PPP loan application, which was signed by an authorized representative of the
business. The PPP loan application required the business (through its authorized
representative) to acknowledge the program rules and make certain affirmative
certifications in order to be eligible to obtain the PPP loan. In the PPP loan
application, the small business(through its authorized representative) was required
to state, among other things, its: (i) average monthly payroll expenses; and (ii)
number of employees. These figures were used to calculate the amount of money the
small business was eligible to receive under the PPP.In addition, businesses applying
for a PPP loan were required to provide documentation showing their pajrroll
expenses.
A PPP loan application was required to be processed by a participating
financial institution ("lender"). If a PPP loan application was approved, the lender
funded the PPP loan using its own monies, which were 100% guaranteed by the SBA.
Data from the application, including information about the borrower, the total
amount of the loan, and the listed number of employees, was transmitted by the
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 4 of 18
lender to the SBA in the course of processing the loan.
PPP loan proceeds were required to be used by the business on certain
permissible expenses: payroll costs, interest on mortgages, rent, and utilities. The
PPP allowed the interest and principal on the PPP loan to be entirely forgiven if the
business Spent the loan proceeds on these expense items within a designated period
of time after receiving the proceeds and used a certain amount of the PPP loan
proceeds on payroll expenses.
The Economic Iniurv Disaster Loan Prosfram
The Economic Injury Disaster Loan ("EIDL") program was an SBA program
that provided low-interest financing to small businesses, renters, and homeowners in
regions affected by declared disasters.
The CARES Act authorized the SBA to provide EIDLs to eligible small
businesses experiencing substantial financial disruptions due to the COVID-19
pandemic. In addition, the CARES Act authorized the SBA to issue advances of up to
$10,000 to small businesses. The amount of the advance was determined by the
number of employees the applicant certified having. The advances did not have to be
repaid.
In order to obtain an EIDL and advance, a qualifying business was required to
submit an application to the SBA and provide information about its operations, such
as the number of employees, gross revenue for the 12-month period preceding the
disaster, and cost of goods sold in the 12-month period preceding the disaster. In the
case of EIDLs for COVID-19 relief, the 12-month period was that preceding January
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 5 of 18
31, 2020. The applicant was also required to certify that all of the information in the
application was true and correct to the best of the applicant's knowledge.
EIDL applications were submitted directly to the SBA and processed by the
agency with support from a government contractor, Rapid Finance. The amount of
the loan, if the application was approved, was determined based, in part, on the
information provided in the application concerning the number of employees, gross
revenue, and cost of goods, as described above. Any funds issued under an EIDL or
advance were issued, directly by the SBA. EIDL funds were permitted to be used for
pa5n:oll expenses,sick leave, production costs, and business obligations,such as debts,
rent, and mortgage payments. If the applicant also obtained a loan under the PPP,
the EIDL funds were not permitted to be used for the same purpose as the PPP funds.
The Scheme to Defraud
From in or around May 2020, continuing up to and including at least in or
around August 2020, Defendant KIRKLAND devised a scheme to defraud by
submitting and causing to be submitted false and fraudulent loan applications (i) to
the SBA in order to obtain funds through the EIDL program and (ii) to Financial
Institution 1 in order to obtain funds through the PPP.
Purpose of the Scheme to Defraud
It was the purpose ofthe scheme for Defendant KIRKLAND to unjustly enrich
herself and others by obtaining EIDL and PPP loan proceeds under false and
misleading pretenses, including by making false statements that she operated a she
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 6 of 18
operated a business named "Kirklands Hair N Beauty" located in Swainsboro,
Georgia, when she did not.
Manner and Means
On or about July 30, 2020, Defendant KIRKLAND applied electronically for
an EIDL from the SBA ("SBA Loan #6059798202). In connection with her EIDL
Application, Defendant KIRKLAND falsely affirmed, among other information, that
she operated a business named "Kirklands Hair N Beauty" located in Swainsboro,
Georgia, and that the business had three employees, and in the twelve months prior
to the disaster, had $253,423 in gross revenues and $120,673 in cost of goods sold.
On or about August 10, 2020, EIDL Application was approved for an EIDL loan in
the amount of $66,400.
On or about August 12, 2020, approximately $66,400 in PPP funds were
deposited into an account controlled by Defendant KIRKLAND at Financial
Institution 1.
COUNT ONE
Wire Fraud
U.S.C. § 1343
Beginning in or about May 2020,and continuing until in or about August 2020,
within the Southern District of Georgia, and elsewhere, the defendant,
TRACY KIRKLAND,
and others known and unknown to the grand jury, aided and abetted by each other,
having knowingly devised and intended to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud,
and to obtain money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent
6
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 7 of 18
pretenses, representations, and promises, did transmit and cause to be transmitted
by means of wire communications in-interstate commerce, writings, signs, signals,
pictures, and sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice, as set
forth below:
Count Approximate Date Description
1 August 12, 2020 Wire transfer of $66,400 that the SBA, in
Colorado, caused to be routed in interstate
commerce to Defendant KIRKLAND's
account at Financial Institution 1.
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 and 2.
3. Possible Sentence
Defendant's guilty plea will subject her to the following maximum possible
sentence: 20 years' imprisonment, 3 years' supervised release, and a $250,000 fine;
but if the violation occurs in relation to, or involving any benefit authorized,
transported, transmitted, transferred, disbursed or paid in connection with a
presidentially declared major disaster or emergency, such person shall be subject to
a maximum possible sentence of 30 years'imprisonment, 3 years'supervised release
and a $1,000,000 fine. The defendant will also be subject to such restitution as may
be ordered by the Court, and forfeiture of all forfeitable assets. The Court
additionally must impose a $100 special assessment per count of conviction.
4. No Promised Sentence
No one has promised Defendant that the Court will impose any particular
sentence or a sentence within any particular range. The Court is not bound by any
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 8 of 18
estimate of sentence given or recommendations made by Defendant's counsel, the
government, the U.S. Probation Office, or anyone else. The Court may impose a
sentence up to the statutory maximum. Defendant will not be allowed to withdraw
her plea of guilty if she receives a more severe sentence than she expects.
5. Court's Use of Sentencing Guidelines
The Court is obligated to use the United States Sentencing Guidelines to
calculate the applicable guideline range for Defendant's offense. The Sentencing
Guidelines are advisory; the Court is not required to impose a sentence within the
range those Guidelines suggest. The Court will consider that range, possible
departures under the Sentencing Guidelines, and other sentencing factors under 18
U.S.C. § 3553(a), in determining the Defendant's sentence. The Sentencing
Guidelines are based on^of Defendant's relevant conduct, pursuant to U.S.S.G. §
1B1.3, not just the conduct underl5dng the particular Count or Counts to which
Defendant is pleading guilty.
6. Agreements Regarding Sentencing Guidelines
a. Use of Information
Nothing in this agreement precludes the government from providing full and
accurate information to the Court and U.S. Probation Office for use in calculating the
applicable Sentencing Guidelines range.
b. Acceptance of Resnonsibilitv
If the Court determines that Defendant qualifies for an adjustment under
U.S.S.G. § 3El.l(a), and the offense level prior to operation of § 3El.l(a) is 16 or
8
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 9 of 18
greater, the government will move for an additional one-level reduction in offense
level pursuant to Section 3El.l(b) based on Defendant's timely notification of her
intention to enter a guilty plea.
c. Amount of Loss
The government and Defendant agree to recommend to the U.S. Probation
Office and the Court at sentencing that the amount of loss, for purposes of Section
2B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines, is more than $40,000 but less than $95,000.
d. Low End of Guidelines Range
The government will recommend that Defendant be sentenced to the low end
of the advisory Guidelines range determined by the Court at sentencing.
7. Cooperation
a. Complete and Truthful Cooperation Required
Defendant must provide full, complete, candid, and truthful cooperation in the
investigation and prosecution of the offenses charged in her Indictment and any
related offenses. Defendant shall fully and truthfully disclose her knowledge of those
offenses and shall fully and truthfully answer any question put to her by law
enforcement officers about those offenses.
This agreement does not require Defendant to "make a case" against any
particular person. Her benefits under this agreement are conditioned only on her
cooperation and truthfulness, not on the outcome of any trial, grand jury, or other
proceeding.
b. Motion for Reduction in Sentence Based on Cooperation
vTvC
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 10 of 18
The government, in its sole discretion, will decide whether Defendant's
cooperation qualifies as "substantial assistance" pursuant to U.S.S.G.§ 5K1.1 or Fed.
R. Grim. P. 35 and thereby warrants the filing of a motion for downward departure
or reduction in Defendant's sentence. If such a motion is filed, the Court, in its sole
discretion, will decide whether, and to what extent, Defendant's sentence should be
reduced. The Court is not required to accept any recommendation by the government
that the Defendant's sentence be reduced.
8. Forfeiture
a. Defendant agrees to forfeit her any property constituting, or is derived
from proceeds obtained directly or indirectly, as result ofthe Title 18 offense to which
she has agreed to plead guilty. More specifically, one (1) 2019 DODGE CHARGER
VIN 2C3CDXCT8KH526749, and (2) $16,250 in U.S. Currency (collectively, the
"Subject Propertj^').
b. Defendant states that she is the sole and rightful owner of the Subject
Property that, to the best of her knowledge, no other person or entity has any interest
in the Subject Property, and that she has not transferred, conveyed, or encumbered
her interest in the Subject Property. Defendant waives and abandons all right, title,
and interest in the Subject Property. Defendant agrees to take all steps requested by
the government to facilitate transfer of title of the Subject Property to the
government. Defendant further agrees not to file any claim, answer, or petition for
remission or mitigation in any administrative or judicial proceeding pertaining to the
10
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 11 of 18
Subject Property. If any such document has already been filed, Defendant hereby
withdraws that filing.
c. Defendant hereby agrees to the entry of an Order of Forfeiture reflecting
a money judgment in the amount of $66,400,said sum constituting the gross proceeds
Defendant obtained as a result of the offense to which she has agreed to plead guilty,
as determined by the Court at sentencing.
d. Defendant agrees to hold the government and its agents and employees
harmless from any claims made in connection with the seizure, forfeiture, or disposal
of property connected to this case. Defendant further agrees to waive the
requirements of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 32.2 and 43(a) regarding
notice of the forfeiture in the charging instrument, announcement of the forfeiture at
sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture in the judgment.
e. Defendant waives and abandons her interest in any other property that
may have been seized in connection with this case. Additionally, Defendant waives
any and all challenges on any grounds to the seizure, forfeiture, and disposal of any
property seized in connection with this case. Defendant specifically agrees to waive
any challenges arising under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment
and the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment.
9. Financial Obligations and Agreements
a. Restitution
The amount of restitution ordered by the Court shall include restitution for the
full loss caused by Defendant's total criminal conduct. Restitution is not hmited to
11
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 12 of 18
the specific counts to which Defendant is pleading guilty. Any restitution judgment
is intended to and will survive Defendant, notwithstanding the abatement of any
underl5dng criminal conviction,
b. Special Assessment
Defendant agrees to pay a special assessment in the amount of $100, payable
to the Clerk of the United States District Court, which shall be due immediately at
the time of sentencing.
c. Required Financial Disclosures
By the date that Defendant enters a guilty plea. Defendant shall complete a
financial disclosure form listing all her assets and financial interests, whether held
directly or indirectly, solely or jointly, in her name or in the name of another.
Defendant shall sign the financial disclosure form under penalty of perjury and
provide that form to the Financial Litigation Unit of the United States Attorney's
Office and to the United States Probation Office. Defendant authorizes the United
States to obtain credit reports on Defendant and to share the contents of those reports
with the Court and the United States Probation Office. Defendant also authorizes
the United States Attorney's Office to inspect and copy all financial documents and
information held by the United States Probation Office.
d. Financial Examination
Defendant will submit to an examination under oath on the issue of her
financial disclosures and assets if deemed necessary by the United States. Such
12
vX.
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 13 of 18
examination will occur not later than 30 days after the entry of Defendant's guilty
plea.
e. No Transfer of Assets
Defendant certifies that she has made no transfer of assets in contemplations
of this prosecution for the purpose of evading or defeating financial obligations
created by this Agreement or that may be imposed upon her by the Court at
sentencing. Defendant promises that she will make no such transfers in the future.
f. Material Change in Circumstances
Defendant agrees to notify the United States of any material change in
circumstances, as described in 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k), that occurs prior to sentencing in
this case. Such notification will be made within seven days of the event giving rise
to the changed circumstances, and in no event later than the date of sentencing.
g. Enforcement
Any payment schedule imposed by the Court is without prejudice to the United
States to take all actions and remedies available to it to collect the full amount of the
financial obligations imposed by the judgment of the Court in this case. Defendant
understands and agrees that the financial obligations and forfeiture imposed by the
judgment of the Court in this case will be placed on the Treasury Offset Program so
that any federal payment that Defendant receives may be offset and applied to the
judgment debt without regard to or affecting any payment schedule imposed by the
Court.
13
-TTVC
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 14 of 18
10. Waivers
a. Waiver of Appeal
Defendant entirely waives her right to a direct appeal of her conviction and
sentence on any ground (including any argument that the statute to which the
defendant is pleading guilty is unconstitutional or that the admitted conduct does not
fall within the scope of the statute). The only exceptions are that the Defendant may
file a direct appeal of her sentence if (1) the court enters a sentence above the
statutory maximum,(2) the court enters a sentence above the advisory Sentencing
Guidelines range found to apply by the court at sentencing; or (3) the Government
appeals the sentence. Absent those exceptions, Defendant explicitly and irrevocably
instructs her attorney not to file an appeal.
b. Waiver of Collateral Attack
Defendant entirely waives her right to collaterally attack her conviction and
sentence on any ground and by any method, including but not limited to a 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 motion. The only exception is that Defendant may collaterally attack her
conviction and sentence based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
c. FOIA and Privacv Act Waiver
Defendant waives all rights, whether asserted directly or through a
representative, to request or receive from any department or agency of the United
States any record pertaining to the investigation or prosecution of this case under the
authority of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, or the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and aU subsequent amendments thereto.
14
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 15 of 18
d. Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(f) and Fed. R. Evid. 410 Waiver
Rule 11(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and Rule 410 of the
Federal Rules of Evidence ordinarily limit the admissibility of statements made by a
defendant during the course of plea discussions or plea proceedings. Defendant
knowingly and voluntarily waives the protections of these rules. If Defendant fails
to plead guilty, or her plea of guilty is later withdrawn, all of Defendant's statements
in connection with this plea, and any leads derived therefrom, shall be admissible for
any and all purposes.
11. Defendant's Rights
Defendant has the right to be represented by counsel, and if necessary have
the court appoint counsel, at trial and at every other critical stage of the proceeding.
Defendant possesses a number of rights which she will waive by pleading guilty,
including: the right to plead not guilty, or having already so pleaded, to persist in
that plea; the right to a jury trial; and the right at trial to confront and cross-examine
adverse witnesses, to be protected from compelled self-incrimination, to testify and
present evidence, and to compel the attendance of witnesses.
13. Satisfaction with Counsel
Defendant has had the benefit of legal counsel in negotiating this agreement.
Defendant believes that her attorney has represented her faithfully, skillfully, and
diligently, and she is completely satisfied with the legal advice given and the work
performed by her attorney.
15
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 16 of 18
12. Breach of Plea Agreement
If Defendant fails to plead guilty, withdraws or attempts to withdraw her
guilty plea, commits any new criminal conduct following the execution of this
agreement, or otherwise breaches this agreement, the government is released from
all of its agreements regarding Defendant's sentence, including any agreements
regarding the calculation of Defendant's advisory Sentencing Guidelines. In addition,
the government may declare the plea agreement null and void, reinstate any counts
that may have been dismissed pursuant to the plea agreement, and/or file new
charges against Defendant that might otherwise be barred by this plea agreement.
Defendant waives any statute-of-limitations or speedy trial defense to prosecutions
reinstated or commenced under this paragraph.
15. Entire Agreement
This agreement contains the entire agreement between the government and
Defendant.
BOBBY L. CHRISTINE
U?;IITEDBWES
Date "Karl I. Knoche
Chief, Criminal Division
Date Steven H. Lee
Assistant United States Attorney
16
TTti-
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 17 of 18
I have read and carefully reviewed this agreement with my attorney. I
understand each provision of this agreement, and I voluntarily agree to it. I hereby
stipulate that the factual basis set out therein is true and accurate in every respect.
Date Defend
I have fully explained to Defendant all of her rights, and I have carefully
reviewed each and every part of this agreement with her. I believe that she fully and
completely understands it, and that her decision to enter into this agreement is an
informed, intelligent, and voluntary one.
Date Defendant's Attorney
17
Case 6:21-cr-00002-JRH-CLR Document 18 Filed 03/19/21 Page 18 of 18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
STATESBORO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CR:
TRACY KIRKLAND
ORDER
The aforesaid Plea Agreement, having been considered by the Court in conjunction with
the interrogation by the Court of the defendant and the defendant's attorney at a hearing on the
defendant's motion to change her plea and the Court finding that the plea of guilty is made freely,
voluntarily and knowingly, it is thereupon,
ORDERED that the plea of guilty by defendant be, and it is, hereby accepted and the
foregoing Plea Agreement be, and it is, hereby ratified and confirmed.
This /f^avof A<ZicA 2021,
THE HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL
JUDGE,J^ITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
File and source
- File
- 18.pdf
- Size
- 1,379,558 bytes
- SHA-256
- db00a048d13e834e5a3c52c648937892a0bec5e47286c63213eb67c86219cec3
- Our copy
- 18.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.