Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Memorandum Opinion — Sha-Poppin v. JPMorgan (Dkt. 87, N.D. Ill.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Memorandum Opinion — Sha-Poppin v. JPMorgan (Dkt. 87, N.D. Ill.)

Summary

A memorandum opinion and order by United States District Judge Joan B. Gottschall, dated August 10, 2021 and filed as Document 87 in Sha-Poppin Gourmet Popcorn LLC and Ajira AI LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Case No. 20-cv-2523 and Case No. 20-cv-4428, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiffs allege Chase did not process PPP loan applications on a first-come, first-served basis and bring negligence, fraudulent concealment, tortious interference, Illinois Consumer Fraud Act and unjust enrichment claims. The court finds the deposit account agreement is an enforceable agreement to arbitrate that clearly and unmistakably delegates arbitrability to the arbitrator. It grants Chase's motions to compel arbitration and stay the suits under 9 U.S.C. §§ 2–3.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 230 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name87-docket.pdf
SHA-2566d6946f62fb003e16073b05f1b8787285c2ba5a31ca9cc0072be591c73685ae6
Size235,770 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
87-docket.pdf
Size
235,770 bytes
SHA-256
6d6946f62fb003e16073b05f1b8787285c2ba5a31ca9cc0072be591c73685ae6
Our copy
87-docket.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top