Memorandum Opinion — Sha-Poppin v. JPMorgan (Dkt. 83, N.D. Ill.)

Summary

A memorandum opinion and order by United States District Judge Joan B. Gottschall, dated March 5, 2021 and filed as Document 83 in Sha-Poppin Gourmet Popcorn LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and Phunware, Inc., Case No. 20-cv-2523, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. It summarizes the amended complaint's allegation that Chase gave preferential treatment to certain customers under the PPP's first-come, first-served rule, and that Sha-Poppin obtained a $6,000 PPP loan from another bank. The court resolves Phunware's motion to dismiss on personal jurisdiction grounds, stating that, as far as appears from the amended complaint, Phunware did not apply for a loan in Illinois or direct a loan application there. It grants dismissal of count VI, the unjust enrichment claim against Phunware, for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used