Factual Proffer — United States v. Jason Scott Carter (Southern District of Florida, Document 41)
Summary
Factual Proffer in United States v. Jason Scott Carter, Case 9:22-cr-80094-WPD, in the Southern District of Florida, Document 41 entered on the FLSD docket 10/12/2022. The United States and Jason Scott Carter, with undersigned counsel, agree that had the case proceeded to trial the United States would have proven the stated facts beyond a reasonable doubt. The proffer describes the SBA's EIDL program, under which applicants certified their information as true and correct, and states that Carter submitted an EIDL application for a company and certified its gross revenues and cost of goods sold. It states that the representations were knowingly false, concerning the company's revenues and the use of the funds, and that the facts are offered as a basis for the defendant's plea of guilty. The signature blocks name an Assistant United States Attorney and the defendant.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Factual Proffer — United States v. Jason Scott Carter (Southern District of Florida, Document 41).”
Original at ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-9-22-cr-80094-dkt-41-s-d-fla-aaa9ea746c/
, SHA-256 9d687bb7047db36294120e1a51efd962d31196a671dbc81e390286ecdb47b3d4.Full text
Case 9:22-cr-80094-WPD Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/12/2022 Page 1 of 3
"UNIT~D :sTATES DJSTRICl' COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
·.. OF FLORIDA
. ·. . .
Case No. 22-cr-80()94,-)).ll\ll'f.ROU,LEAS
UNITED.STATES OF AME~tCA
vs.
JASON SCOTT CARTER,
____________
.I)efendant.
____,/·
FACTUAL P80FFER
The· United States of Amerii::~ .Jason Scott Cartex (''.Carter"), amt hi~ undersigµ.ed. counsel
agree that, had this- ~ase· -proc.ee:o.eq to ·µiaj., tb.e United Statt::~ woul4.have.· proven -the followi.h~
facts,_ among others, beyond a reas_0nable doµbt:
The .. E(;olion:iic. Injury· Dis~ster Loan ("EIDV') program was· a Small Business
Admil)istration C'SBA'') _progr.:µn_-,;m~ated fu:M}l];ch· 2020 by the- Corona.virus Aid, .Relief~ arid
Economic Security ("CARES").Act that provided low-interest financing .and cash advanc.es that
cJid not have to· be repaid to _s;!Uall business~s ex:petiencin~ substantial ·financial disruption due-to
"the COVID-19 .pru:i.d~mic,. T'o. obtain .a ioan and .advance -under--th.~ EIDL ,progfam, a .q~ing
.busiiies.s v.,as requited to ·stj.bm.it ah -~ppiic~ti.OJJ. to ·thie SBA and· provide information ·about -its
operations,. such ~s the number.ofett).ploye~s, grc;,~_s r.cweuµe_s.forthe ·t2.:.rnontli _period preceding_
the disaster,.defined.as bcc~ig on Janµary 31,202_0". Th~ app!icant wa.sJurther-required·to:certify
that all of·the .information .iii the -:applica\iQn w"'s "true and c9rr~ct t9 the best .of the· appiicanfs.
knowledg_e.
EibL: a;p.plicatioris· were submitted clirectly to-the: saA and processed by·the-.agency with
supporrfrom a government cc,,~tiactc;,r, R_api<;l .Fiila1;1.ce,. through.-servers existing outsfde the: state.
Case 9:22-cr-80094-WPD Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/12/2022 Page 2 of 3
of Florida:. The amoi.111t- of the loa~, ·if the applic~tiQn· was t,lppro.ved, was detennined based on ihe
irifortnatiop. provicied by the appli_c~t~bou~ employment, revenue?-and cost of;g'ootls,_as.described
above . .AQ.y funds issued ·wider a11.;EIP~ or:advance were·1ssued.directly.bythe.-SBA. EIDL·funds
could be us.<;id for-payroH expenses,. sick le.ave, production costs.~ and business Qbligati(ms~ -such as.
d.e.bt~, re.pt, tµ1d rpprtgage parments.
OIJ. Mar.ch 3.1 ~ 2026, Carter:subrnitted an ctpplicatioil. to the. SBJ.\.::.eelci~g-a:l,qan.and advance.
·Wider the·. EIDL. program.. Jor .h,!s conip~ny, Jason S~. Carter, inc_; (the. '"Company"). In. that
application, Carter. ct;:rtilied th.at .hi.s gross revenues -forAhe _year :precedfog the· pandemic were.
$.100.,000 -and his ·eost_qf good_s s~ld Was $40,000 .. C~er ,certi:fied.-that. those representations were
true and correct· on the application -and prqvided hls,.corr~~t personal..identify:ine;·infomiation· atid
the corporate ·bank account fo.r ·th~ ·:CQmpany where SBA was: to direct the funds. On April '21 :,.
2020, the· SBA dii"ec~ly deposited a $,l.,QbO. cash.'advance-in the ·C:Otnpany' bank account. Oil May
26, 2020, Cari;er execute4 a loan· agreement with SBA for a.loan amount of $29~_000. On 'that loan
application, Carter recerti:fieq. that his prfor: representation that the cr5mpany haii $'.100,_000. itj
revenue f<;irthe year
.
prec~ding the disaster was true and ·correct, certified
.
that he· wo-qld .1,1s.e:.~y
fun,ds -received f~oni .fh,e .Si3A..only fot- ,;-working: capital to alleviate economic ip,Jucy•► c~ui,;e4. by
the COVID- 1.9. p~d¢mic;;, and -M~in e~rt1fied that his. representations on the= toan agreement mid
sU.pportiil.~ documents, fricfacling the· intake. ~ppiication, wel'.e-"tr.ue· .and ·cottect urtder penalty- :of
perjury. On May 29~ 2020, th¢ :SBA. d,irectly· d~pos.it~~ $28;9.00, the loan amount.Jess a. $100
processing.fee,.into the Corit_pahy"bahk.ac9ount.
These t.epres·entations were ki1o:wip.gly 'false- .in two resp~cts . .Fir:;;t; the Company did not.
have r~venues 0{$100.000 for the. relevanttime p~tiod. -,As:.refl~cted iJI.hfa business bank account
2
Case 9:22-cr-80094-WPD Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/12/2022 Page 3 of 3
-records-amttheTevenues Hsted on"hi"fl;orpqra~e taxfotuin for 20] 9, th¢Coriipaiiy had revenues--
far lower· than $100;()00. Carter intentionally inflated that loan amount to get additional EIDL
funds. Second, Carter falsely stated t.hat he would use the funds only on alleviating economic h1jury
to.his company. In fact, he intend,ed, and did, spend $21;788 or the EIDL funds on high.-end and
o.ther repairs to a personal vintage car of his, a.19.69 Ford.Mustang, from June 15 through October
23, 2022. Carter made these false representations for the purpose of inducing SBA to transfer the
cash advance and loan proceeds fo. the Company.
As ofthe-date-of this factual proffer, the cu:rrent un~ollected bal~nce 'On Carter's EIDL loan
from the SBA is $28,616.00.
The facts described above are not intended to be a complete· re~itation of the,facts of this
case and are merely intended to foflll Ii basis for the unclersigned defendant's knowing, willful, and
intentional plea of guilty.
JUAN ANTONIO GONZALEZ
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Date: /,2./22
Jo »- •
By:.
:::~EN~
JULIA M. MALONEY
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS
Date: By:
TZ
.· R DEFENDANT
l
----
Date: B . ~---=::,
.
--~
' ~TT=C=AR=--.-T-.E------'R==--------
' EFENDANT
3
File and source
- File
- 41-major-prep-tsv-rank-86.pdf
- Size
- 129,720 bytes
- SHA-256
- 9d687bb7047db36294120e1a51efd962d31196a671dbc81e390286ecdb47b3d4
- Our copy
- 41-major-prep-tsv-rank-86.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)