Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — United States v. Diana Lynn Johnson (Middle District of Florida, Document 53)

Order — United States v. Diana Lynn Johnson (Middle District of Florida, Document 53)

Summary

An Order in United States v. Diana Lynn Johnson and Roger Christopher Johnson, Case No. 8:26-cr-16-CEH-LSG, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, Document 53, filed September 10, 2026. The Court grants Roger Christopher Johnson's Motion for a Hearing to Determine the Linguistic Competency of the Defendant (Doc. 40) and Diana Lynn Johnson's Motion for Linguistic Competency Evaluation (Doc. 44), and appoints Jean F. Andrews, Ph.D., to examine both defendants. The order recites that the defendants were arrested on April 30, 2024, on a sealed indictment from the Eastern District of Texas under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) (Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering), and that counsel assert both were born deaf. It directs Dr. Andrews to submit a written report within 30 days.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — United States v. Diana Lynn Johnson (Middle District of Florida, Document 53).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-8-26-cr-00016-dkt-53-m-d-fla-0acd9e16b1/, SHA-256 3ee81dc42f6eb86d9c6fa7f8ada8af5298c3ff48c17e30b0ee5eca6b3b413649.

Full text

Case 8:26-cr-00016-CEH-LSG         Document 53      Filed 09/10/26     Page 1 of 5 PageID 269




                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
                                 TAMPA DIVISION

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 v.                                                      CASE NO: 8:26-cr-16-CEH-LSG

 DIANA LYNN JOHNSON and
 ROGER CHRISOPHER JOHNSON
 ___________________________________/

                                          ORDER

          This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant Roger Christopher

 Johnson’s Motion for a Hearing to Determine the Linguistic Competency of the

 Defendant Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241 (Doc. 40) and Diana Lynn Johnson’s Motion

 for Linguistic Competency Evaluation (Doc. 44). 1 The Motions ask the Court to

 appoint an expert to examine Defendants for linguistic competency.

          On April 30, 2024, Diana Lynn Johnson and Roger Christopher Johnson were

 arrested for violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) (Conspiracy to Commit Money

 Laundering) in a sealed indictment from the United States District Court for the

 Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division (6:22-cr-00159-JCB-KNM). Doc. 1. On May

 9, 2024, the Eastern District of Texas appointed Assistant Federal Public Defender

 Kenneth Robert Hawk, II, and Attorney Bobby D. Mims (collectively “Texas

 Counsel”) to represent Diana Lynn Johnson and Roger Christopher Johnson

 respectively. Texas Counsel met with Defendants in person with the assistance of an



 1
     The Government does not oppose either motion. See Docs. 43, 49.
Case 8:26-cr-00016-CEH-LSG      Document 53     Filed 09/10/26    Page 2 of 5 PageID 270




 American Sign Language (“ASL”) interpreter. Texas Counsel performed extensive

 research concerning litigation involving deaf and hearing-impaired clients, which led

 to a concern about Defendants’ linguistic competency. Accordingly, on June 19, 2025,

 Texas Counsel filed a Joint Suggestion of Linguistic Incompetence and Request for

 the Funding of an Expert to Examine the Defendants. On July 7, 2025, the Eastern

 District of Texas granted the motion.

       The linguistic competency evaluation was not completed in Texas, as this case

 was transferred from the Eastern District of Texas to the Middle District of Florida on

 January 23, 2026. Doc. 17. On June 16, 2026, the Court held a status conference and

 ordered Counsel to submit a new motion for a linguistic competency evaluation. Doc.

 37.

       Counsel for both Defendants assert that communication with Defendants is

 challenging because both Defendants were born deaf and communicate only in writing

 or through an ASL interpreter. Counsel believe that Defendants may not understand

 the trial process with enough competence to stand trial. Counsel seek an ASL expert

 in linguistics and trial procedures who can conduct an examination for linguistic

 competence. Counsel for both Defendants move the Court to appoint Dr. Jean

 Andrews of Beaumont, TX, as an expert to examine the defendants for linguistic

 competence. Dr. Andrews is a recognized expert in Speech and Hearing Sciences and

 Linguistics. She has experience in linguistic competency evaluations of deaf litigants

 and defendants in federal and state courts.



                                           2
Case 8:26-cr-00016-CEH-LSG     Document 53     Filed 09/10/26   Page 3 of 5 PageID 271




       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4241, the Court finds reason to believe that Defendants

 Diana Lynn Johnson and Roger Christopher Johnson may not be able to understand

 the nature and consequences of the proceedings against them or to properly assist in

 their respective defenses.

       Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

           1. Defendant Roger Christopher Johnson’s Motion for a Hearing to

              Determine the Linguistic Competency of the Defendant Pursuant to 18

              U.S.C. § 4241 (Doc. 40) is GRANTED.

           2. Defendant Diana Lynn Johnson’s Motion for Linguistic Competency

              Evaluation (Doc. 44) is GRANTED.

           3. Jean F. Andrews, Ph.D., is hereby APPOINTED to examine

              Defendants Roger Christopher Johnson and Diana Lynn Johnson.

           4. The aforesaid examination is for the purpose of determining if each

              defendant is linguistically competent to be able to understand the

              proceedings against him/her and properly assist in his/her own defense.

              The criteria to be applied for the purpose of rendering the opinion

              requested is whether each defendant has sufficient present ability to

              consult with his/her lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational

              understanding, and whether each defendant has a rational, as well as

              factual, understanding of the proceedings against him/her. The report

              should also include



                                          3
Case 8:26-cr-00016-CEH-LSG     Document 53     Filed 09/10/26    Page 4 of 5 PageID 272




                a. the person's history and present symptoms,

                b. description of any psychiatric, psychological, medical, or linguistic

                   tests that were employed and their results, and

                c. the examiner's findings.

          5. Dr. Andrews shall submit a written report of her findings within 30 days

             to United States District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell, 801 North

             Florida Avenue, Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse, Tampa, FL

             33602; with copies mailed to Assistant United States Attorney Courtney

             Derry, 400 North Tampa Street, Suite 3200, Tampa, FL 33602; defense

             counsel Patrick N. Leduc, Law Offices of Patrick Leduc, P.A., 4809 E.

             Busch Blvd. Suite 204, Tampa, FL 33647; and Assistant Federal Public

             Defender Yamilette Alvarez, 400 North Tampa Street Suite 2700,

             Tampa, FL 33603.

          6. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to Dr. Andrews at 1255 19th

             Street, Beaumont, TX 77706. Dr. Andrews’ telephone number is (409)

             351-5216. The statement for Dr. Andrews’ services shall be sent to the

             Office of the United States Attorney, 400 North Tampa Street, Suite

             3200, Tampa, FL 33602.

       DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on September 10, 2026.




                                          4
Case 8:26-cr-00016-CEH-LSG     Document 53    Filed 09/10/26      Page 5 of 5 PageID 273




 Copies to: Counsel of Record and Unrepresented Parties, if any




                                          5


File and source

File
53.pdf
Size
96,919 bytes
SHA-256
3ee81dc42f6eb86d9c6fa7f8ada8af5298c3ff48c17e30b0ee5eca6b3b413649
Our copy
53.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top