Court filing — No. 7:21-cr-00681 (Dkt. 173, S.D.N.Y.)

Summary

A pro se filing styled Complaint Affidavit Challenge of Credibility of hearsay in notarized Affidavit, received February 20, 2024 and filed February 22, 2024 as Document 173 in Case 7:21-CR-00681-NSR in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It is captioned salahuddin, brenda vs. United States of America, Agent Jeffrey C. Coffman and Agent Courtney Heavey, and is marked without prejudice ucc 1-308. The filing argues that the arrest affidavit lacked a penalty of perjury statement and is at best hearsay. It is 3 pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 7:21-cr-00681-NSR Document 173 Filed 02/22/24 Page 1 of 3
RECEIVED
FEB 20 2024
U.S.D.C.
W.P.
1 of 3
In The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF NEW YORK
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
without Prejudice ucc 1-308
salahuddin, brenda
vs. 7:21-CR-00681-NSR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
AGENT, JEFFREY C. COFFMAN
AGENT, COURTNEY HEAVEY
DEFENDANTS.
Complaint Affidavit Challenge of Credibility of hearsay in notarized Affidavit under penalty of perjury, Also recorded without prejudice ucc 1-308 Communication
1. In the Current public records Criminal crime offense case documenting the Notary public's official Capacity that is exempted from hearsay that any
Case 7:21-cr-00681-NSR Document 173 Filed 02/22/24 Page 2 of 3
2 of 3
Affidavit must be recorded under penalty of perjury documenting a financial process of dishonor.
2. The arrest affidavit lacked the "penalty of perjury" to trigger the financial process. At best, the arrest Affidavit is hearsay to any financial benefits. The DEFENDANTS based their arrest affidavit on the notary public to execute a financial process that lacked the Required (Penalty of perjury) Liability.
3. The inception of the arrest affidavit triggered the financial process that the court is non-judicial by the notary public official capacity.
4. The rightful property owner of children quadri salahuddin, anwar salahuddin their financial dishonor Notice in their initial affidavit Notarized under the Penalty of perjury
5. This is a financial dishonor process that the common law and the Bill of rights were reserved that property owner Compel the prosecutor to file a valid verified Complaint in which the Childrens injured a party by their actions.
Case 7:21-cr-00681-NSR Document 173 Filed 02/22/24 Page 3 of 3
3 of 3
Acknowledgment
subscribed and sworn to before me a Notary public for said County and state, i do hereby Certify that on this 20th day of February 2024, the above mentioned appeared before me and executed the foregoing Complaint Affidavit, witnessed my hand and seal.
[signature]
CHARLAYNE-RENEE MASON Notary Public – State of New York No. 01MA6351248 Qualified in Westchester County My Commission Expires 11/28/2024
NOTARY PUBLIC/STATE OF NEW YORK
without prejudice ucc 1-308 Communication
y/s/ Brenda Salahuddin NYS Lic# 831 8[illegible]5 075
Being first duly sworn, depose, say, declare, and affirm under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing affidavit of fact are true, correct, Complete and Not Misleading.
Serve all concerned
without prejudice ucc 1-308 Communication


File and source

File

173.pdf

Size

199,690 bytes

SHA-256

6f8009822264eda01d16439ff509ba5c9cca3765d8601d55d93334609a7a5d1d

Our copy

173.pdf

Original

No public link identified.