Order of Forfeiture — U.S. v. Romero Leandro (M.D. Fla.)
Summary
An Order of Forfeiture in United States of America v. Frank Adriel Romero Leandro, Case No. 5:25-cr-44-TPB-PRL, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Ocala Division, filed May 28, 2026 as Document 62. The Court grants the United States' motion (Doc. 61) and finds that the defendant obtained $1,234,360.46 in proceeds from the wire fraud scheme charged in Count One of the Indictment under 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Because the proceeds were transferred to third parties and cannot be located, the United States may seek substitute assets under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p) up to that amount, and the order is final as to the defendant upon entry. The signature block names United States District Judge Tom Barber.
Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order of Forfeiture — U.S. v. Romero Leandro (M.D. Fla.).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-5-25-cr-00044-dkt-62-m-d-fla-823afe8640/
, SHA-256 4daa38f8fee49082d7209d86c999ed1f39395d58882c7af1fe2c060041272ee7.Full text
Case 5:25-cr-00044-TPB-PRL Document 62 Filed 05/28/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID 136
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. Case No. 5:25-cr-44-TPB-PRL
FRANK ADRIEL ROMERO LEANDRO
ORDER OF FORFEITURE
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the United States' Motion for
entry of an order of forfeiture in the amount of $1,234,360.46, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2), which upon
entry, shall be a final order of forfeiture as to the defendant.
Being fully advised of the relevant facts, the Court finds the United States has
established that the defendant obtained $1,234,360.46 in proceeds as a result of the
wire fraud scheme, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, charged in Count One of the
Indictment.
Accordingly, it is hereby:
ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that for good cause shown, the
United States motion (Doc. 61) is GRANTED.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that, the proceeds of the offense were transferred
to third parties, and the United States cannot locate the proceeds upon the exercise of
due diligence. Accordingly, under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), the United States may seek, as
a substitute asset in satisfaction of this judgment, forfeiture of any of the defendant’s
Case 5:25-cr-00044-TPB-PRL Document 62 Filed 05/28/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID 137
property up to the $1,234,360.46 order of forfeiture. The court retains jurisdiction to
enter any order necessary to the forfeiture and disposition of any substitute asset.
DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Ocala, Florida, this 28th day of May,
2026.
Copies to:
Nicole M. Andrejko, AUSA
Counsel of Record
2
File and source
- File
- 62.pdf
- Size
- 157,101 bytes
- SHA-256
- 4daa38f8fee49082d7209d86c999ed1f39395d58882c7af1fe2c060041272ee7
- Our copy
- 62.pdf
- Original
- archive.org