Opinion of the Court — United States v. Jennifer Corinne Scoggins (Eleventh Circuit)

Summary

Per curiam Opinion of the Court filed March 27, 2025 as Document 34-1 in United States of America v. Jennifer Corinne Scoggins, No. 24-11544, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, D.C. Docket No. 5:23-cr-00087-MHH-HNJ-1. The panel consists of Circuit Judges Jordan, Luck and Kidd. The opinion states that appointed counsel William Bradford moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). It states that independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, grants counsel's motion to withdraw and affirms Scoggins's conviction and sentence. The document is marked DO NOT PUBLISH and is two pages.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Opinion of the Court — United States v. Jennifer Corinne Scoggins (Eleventh Circuit).” Original at www.govinfo.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-5-23-cr-00087-82c19966c3/, SHA-256 6040e46301a99aa800fb521718a2b7e4a7342eece8dff76f652fc3e495b8e1c4.

Full text

USCA11 Case: 24-11544    Document: 34-1     Date Filed: 03/27/2025   Page: 1 of 2




                                                  [DO NOT PUBLISH]
                                   In the
                United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eleventh Circuit

                          ____________________

                                No. 24-11544
                          Non-Argument Calendar
                          ____________________

       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                                                      Plaintiﬀ-Appellee,
       versus
       JENNIFER CORINNE SCOGGINS,


                                                  Defendant-Appellant.


                          ____________________

                 Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Northern District of Alabama
                 D.C. Docket No. 5:23-cr-00087-MHH-HNJ-1
                          ____________________
USCA11 Case: 24-11544      Document: 34-1     Date Filed: 03/27/2025     Page: 2 of 2




       2                      Opinion of the Court                 24-11544


       Before JORDAN, LUCK, and KIDD, Circuit Judges.
       PER CURIAM:
               William Bradford, appointed counsel for Jennifer Scoggins
       in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further
       representation and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
       U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record re-
       veals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
       correct. Because independent examination of the entire record re-
       veals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
       GRANTED, and Scoggins’s conviction and sentence are
       AFFIRMED.

File and source

File: ca11-24-11544-doc34-1-opinion-11th-cir-no-24-11544-per-curiam-opinion-03-27-2025-affirming.pdf
Size: 131,713 bytes
SHA-256: 6040e46301a99aa800fb521718a2b7e4a7342eece8dff76f652fc3e495b8e1c4
Our copy: ca11-24-11544-doc34-1-opinion-11th-cir-no-24-11544-per-curiam-opinion-03-27-2025-affirming.pdf
Original: www.govinfo.gov