Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — United States v. Jamoni Edwards (Eastern District of North Carolina, Document 13)

Order — United States v. Jamoni Edwards (Eastern District of North Carolina, Document 13)

Summary

An order in United States of America v. Jamoni Edwards, No. 4:22-CR-59-1D, Case 4:22-cr-00059-D-RJ, Document 13, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Eastern Division, filed 10/14/22. Under Rule 5(f)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, as amended by the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No. 116-182, the court confirms the government's disclosure obligation under Brady v. Maryland. It states that failure to comply could result in consequences such as exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal or reversal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions. The order is dated the 14th day of October, 2022, and names Kimberly A. Swank, United States Magistrate Judge.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — United States v. Jamoni Edwards (Eastern District of North Carolina, Document 13).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-4-22-cr-00059-dkt-13-e-d-n-c-b894cd4c05/, SHA-256 8a105a996d8b4480e4a7c16e1d925326ddeea54e6896c266d2fc899924f70ee1.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
EASTERN DIVISION
No. 4:22-CR-59-1D

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Vv. ORDER

JAMONI EDWARDS,

Defendant.

Pursuant to Rule 5(f)(1) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, as amended by the
Due Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No. 116-182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020), the court hereby
confirms the government’s disclosure obligation under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963),
and its progeny. See Brady, 373 U.S. at 87 (“[T]he suppression by the prosecution of evidence
favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to
guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.”’). Failure by
the government to comply with its disclosure obligation could result in such consequences as
exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal or reversal of charges, contempt
proceedings, or imposition of sanctions.

SO ORDERED, this 14th day of October, 2022.

KIMBERLY A. SWANK
United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:22-cr-00059-D-RJ Document 13 Filed 10/14/22 Page1of1

File and source

File
13.pdf
Size
186,388 bytes
SHA-256
8a105a996d8b4480e4a7c16e1d925326ddeea54e6896c266d2fc899924f70ee1
Our copy
13.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top