Continuance Order — United States v. Nathaniel Anderson (District of New Jersey, Document 18)

Summary

Continuance order in United States v. Nathaniel Anderson, Mag. No. 24-3001 (TJB), in the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, Document 18 in Case 3:24-cr-00535-RK, filed March 27, 2024. It responds to a joint application of the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey and the defendant for a continuance from the date the order is signed through May 31, 2024. The order lists findings, including that plea negotiations are ongoing, that the defendant has consented, and that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7). It orders that the period from the date the order is signed through May 31, 2024 is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

 Case 3:24-cr-00535-RK    Document 18      Filed 03/27/24   Page 1 of 3 PageID: 47




                      UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA               :     Hon. Tonianne J. Bongiovanni,
                                       :     U.S.M.J.
                                       :
      v.                               :     Mag. No. 24-3001 (TJB))
                                       :
NATHANIEL ANDERSON                     :     CONTINUANCE ORDER


      This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of

Philip R. Sellinger, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey

(by Alexander E. Ramey, Assistant United States Attorney), and defendant

Nathaniel Anderson (by Daniel M. Rosenberg, Esq. and Robert M. Perry, Esq.),

for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned

matter from the date this Order is signed through May 31, 2024, to permit

defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation in this

matter and to allow the parties to discuss the matter and conduct plea

negotiations in an effort to resolve the case before grand jury proceedings and

trial; and the defendant being aware that he has the right to have the matter

submitted to a grand jury within 30 days of the date of his arrest pursuant to

Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b); and one prior continuance

having been entered; and the defendant, through his attorney, having

consented to the continuance; and for good and sufficient cause shown,

      IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be

continued for the following reasons:
 Case 3:24-cr-00535-RK       Document 18       Filed 03/27/24   Page 2 of 3 PageID: 48




      (1)      Plea negotiations are ongoing, and both the United States and the

defendant seek time to achieve a successful resolution of these negotiations,

which would render trial of this matter unnecessary;

      (2)      The failure to grant such a continuance would deny counsel for the

defendant or the attorney for the government the reasonable time necessary for

effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence;

      (3)      The defendant has consented to the aforementioned continuance;

      (4)      The grant of a continuance will likely conserve judicial resources;

and

      (5)      Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7), the

ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interests

of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

                               27th day of March, 2024;
      WHEREFORE, it is on this _____

      ORDERED that this action be, and it hereby is, continued from the date

this Order is signed through May 31, 2024; and it is further

      ORDERED that the period from the date this Order is signed through

May 31, 2024, shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial

Act of 1974.



                                        HON. TONIANNE J. BONGIOVANNI
                                        United States Magistrate Judge




                                           2
 Case 3:24-cr-00535-RK   Document 18       Filed 03/27/24   Page 3 of 3 PageID: 49




Form and entry consented to:




Daniel M. Rosenberg, Esq.
Robert M. Perry, Esq.
Counsel for Defendant Nathaniel Anderson




Alexander E. Ramey
Assistant United States Attorney




                                       3


File and source

File

18.pdf

Size

219,408 bytes

SHA-256

1a8240fda8f845b6094ddd4ccb8f6fc7aa6038eb5ea9d57f45b93df03834ef1b

Our copy

18.pdf

Original

No public link identified.