Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Bill of Indictment — U.S. v. Johnson and Maddox (W.D.N.C.)Search ⌕

Bill of Indictment — U.S. v. Johnson and Maddox (W.D.N.C.)

Summary

A bill of indictment in United States v. Antoine Johnson and Kimberly Maddox, Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division, filed February 21, 2024 as Document 1. Count One charges conspiracy to commit bank fraud and wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1349, and Counts Two and Three charge false statements to a financial institution under 18 U.S.C. § 1014. The indictment alleges that between 2018 through 2023 the defendants sought approximately $2 million in lines of credit, bank loans and pandemic relief funds for Pick Up and Go Moving International, Inc. using false financial and employment information. It lists PPP funds of $128,087 and $122,475 from Cross River Bank and an EIDL of approximately $149,900. The forfeiture notice seeks a money judgment of at least $2 million.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Bill of Indictment — U.S. v. Johnson and Maddox (W.D.N.C.).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-3-24-cr-00044-dkt-1-be8344c47d/, SHA-256 dde9e807ee3de5a714fd30f9c74f410b333a38d256b5e5365da1bbd77792b9de.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

_— FILED
_. CHARLOTTE, NC

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FEB 214 2024
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROEINA oo cour
CHARLOTTE DIVISION WESTERN DISTRICT OF NC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOCKET NO. 3:24-cr-44-FDW

Violations: 18 U.S.C. § 1014
18 U.S.C. § 1349
18 U.S.C. § 2

(1) ANTOINE JOHNSON and

)
)
v. ) BILL OF INDICTMENT
)
)
(2) KIMBERLY MADDOX )

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES:

At all relevant times:
Introduction

1, Between 2018 through 2023, Defendants ANTOINE JOHNSON (“JOHNSON”)
and KIMBERLY MADDOX (“MADDOX”) executed a scheme to fraudulently obtain
approximately $2 million in lines of credit, bank loans, and COVID-19 pandemic relief funds on
behalf of their business by submitting false information, including false financial information
and fake employment data, in support of their applications.

Defendants and Their Related Entity

2. JOHNSON and MADDOX were married and residents of Huntersville, North
Carolina, within the Western District of North Carolina.

3. Pick Up and Go Moving International, Inc., also known as, Pickup & Go Moving
International, Inc., Pickup And Go Moving International, Inc., Pick Up And Go Moving
International, Inc., and Pick Up & Go Moving International, Inc. (collectively referred to as
“PUGMI”) was registered in North Carolina, with a business address in Huntersville, North
Carolina. JOHNSON was the president and MADDOX was the vice-president; both were co-
owners of PUGMI.

4. JOHNSON and MADDOX maintained a business bank account at Charlotte
Metro Credit Union ending in x8290 on behalf of PUGMI (the “CMCU Account”).

Victim Financial Institutions

5. Cross River Bank and Pinnacle (“Victim Banks”) were financial institutions, the
accounts and deposits of which were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(“FDIC”).

6. Allegacy Federal Credit Union, Charlotte Metro Credit Union, and Langley
Federal Credit Union (“Victim Credit Unions”) were financial institutions, the accounts and

1
Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR Document1 Filed 02/21/24 Page 1 of 9
deposits of which were insured by the National Credit Union Administration Share Insurance
Fund.

7. The Victim Banks and Victim Credit Unions (hereinafter the “Victim Financial
Institutions”) were financial institutions as defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 20.
The Victim Financial Institutions required, and relied upon, truthful information from applicants
seeking loans and credit lines, including providing truthful information about each applicant’s
business, employment, income, taxes, and other financial information.

The Paycheck Protection Program

8. The Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) was a COVID-19 pandemic relief
program administered by the United States Small Business Administration (“SBA”) that
provided forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other expenses. The
PPP permitted participating SBA approved lenders to approve and disburse SBA-backed PPP
loans to cover payroll, fixed debts, utilities, rent/mortgage, accounts payable and other bills
incurred by qualifying businesses during, and resulting from, the COVID-19 pandemic. PPP
loans were fully guaranteed by the SBA.

9, To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business had to submit a PPP loan application,
which was signed by an authorized representative of the business. The PPP loan application
required the business (through its authorized representative) to acknowledge the program rules
and make certain affirmative certifications to be eligible to obtain the PPP loan, including that
the business was in operation and either had employees for whom it paid salaries and payroll
taxes or paid independent contractors. A business applying for a PPP loan was required to
provide documentation showing its payroll expenses, such as filed federal income tax
documents. The business must have existed in an operational condition on or before February 15,
2020.

The Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program

10. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“‘CARES” Act) was a
federal law enacted on March 27, 2020, designed to provide emergency financial assistance to
the millions of Americans who were suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19
pandemic.

11. The provisions of the CARES Act, in conjunction with an officially declared
disaster by the United States Government, allowed the SBA to offer Economic Injury Disaster
Loan (“EIDL”) funding to business owners negatively affected by COVID-19. Through the SBA
online portal, EIDL applicants could submit personal and business information in support of an
EIDL application.

12. |AnEIDL application included a paragraph where the applicant affirmed that the
information submitted was true and correct under the penalty of perjury and other applicable
criminal statutes. The application process involved filling out data fields relating to the size of
the affected business entity, the ownership of the business, the number of employees, and gross

2
Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR Document1 Filed 02/21/24 Page 2 of 9
revenues realized in the 12 months prior to COVID-19’s impact on the national economy. The
business must have existed in an operational condition on or before January 31, 2020.

13. The EIDL application information, electronically submitted by the applicant, was
then used by SBA systems to calculate the amount of money the business was eligible to receive
in the form of a loan. The SBA Office of Disaster Assistance, an executive branch agency, had
authority over all loans created and disbursed under the EIDL program. EIDLs were solely
funded by the SBA and disbursed from government-controlled accounts maintained with the
U.S. Treasury at Federal Reserve Banks throughout the United States.

The Fraud Scheme and Conspiracy

14, Between November 2018 and November 2023, JOHNSON and MADDOX
fraudulently sought and obtained lines of credit and business loans from the Victim Financial
Institutions in the name of PUGMI by making false and fraudulent statements.

15. When seeking such loans and lines of credit, JOHNSON and MADDOX made
material misrepresentations to the Victim Financial Institutions, upon which the banks relied, to
induce them to approve and fund those loans and lines of credit.

16. The fraudulent statements submitted to the Victim Financial Institutions varied
amongst the different loans requested, but included, among others:
a. Misrepresentations about income;
b. False employment information; and
c. False information about the finances of the borrowers and their business,
including the submission of false tax returns and false financial statements.

17. After relying on the fraudulent loan information, the Victim Financial Institutions
approved and funded the loans and lines of credit. As part of the conspiracy and scheme to
defraud, JOHNSON and MADDOX obtained and attempted to obtain more than 30 loans,
totaling approximately $2 million, from approximately five financial institutions. For example:

a. On or about June 9, 2020, a loan application was submitted to Pinnacle with a
falsified 2017 PUGMI tax record, and represented that PUGMI had an annual
sales revenue of $5.4 million. On or about August 27, 2020, JOHNSON and
MADDOX signed a bank note for a PUGMI loan in the amount of $306,414.48,
which was subsequently funded by Pinnacle.

18. After JOHNSON and MADDOX obtained the proceeds from the fraudulent loans,
they defaulted on many of the loans, causing financial losses to the Victim Financial Institutions.

3
Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR Document1 Filed 02/21/24 Page 3 of 9
The PPP and EIDL Fraud Scheme

19. Between April 2020 and February 2022, JOHNNSON and MADDOX, submitted
and caused to be submitted false and fraudulent PPP loan and EIDL applications in the name of
their business to the SBA and its third-party participating lenders in an attempt to obtain funds.
As a result of the fraudulent loan applications, JOHNSON and MADDOX obtained at least
$400,000 in loan proceeds.

20. It was part of the scheme that JOHNSON and MADDOX knowingly submitted,
and caused to be submitted, PPP loan and EIDL applications and supporting documents on
behalf of PUGMI that contained materially false statements and misrepresentations regarding
PUGMI’s income, gross revenues, expenses, and number of employees, and caused those
fraudulently obtained relief funds to be disbursed to the CMCU Account as set forth below.

PPP Loan Application x7907

21. On or about June 24, 2020, MADDOX submitted and caused to be submitted an
electronic application to Cross River Bank in the name of Pick Up and Go Moving International
Inc (“PPP Loan Application x7907”).

22. | PPP Loan Application x7907 falsely represented that the business had an average
monthly payroll of $51,235.10; had 10 employees; and that the purpose of the loan was for
payroll. In addition, as part of the application, MADDOX provided a false IRS Form W3 signed
by MADDOX as CEO purporting to show that, in 2019, the business made $587,884 in
payments to employees. In fact, no such Form was ever filed with the Internal Revenue Service
on behalf of the business.

23. On or about June 24, 2020, MADDOX signed, and caused to be signed, a Cross
River Bank promissory note, which attested: “I further certify that the information provided in
the application and the information provided in all supporting documents and forms is true and
accurate in all material respects. I understand that knowingly making a false statement to obtain
a guaranteed loan from SBA is punishable under the law, including under 18 USC 1001 and
3751; and, if submitted to a federally insured institution under, 18 USC 1014].]”

24, On or about June 25, 2020, Cross River Bank funded the loan by wiring $128,087
to the CMCU Account.

25. In or around January 2021, JOHNSON contacted Cross River Bank’s processor,
Kabbage, via telephone to inquire about obtaining additional PPP funds.

26. In furtherance of that effort, between January 2021 and February 2021,
JOHNSON and MADDOX made false statements and fraudulent representations about the
business to Kabbage. For example:

4
Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR Document1 Filed 02/21/24 Page 4 of 9
a. On or about February 2, 2021, false 2019 PUGMI federal tax records were
provided.

b. On or about February 11, 2021, a false payroll spreadsheet was provided.

c. Onor about February 11, 2021, during a recorded call, JOHNSON falsely
represented that the business had a lease agreement.

d. On or about February 25, 2021, during a recorded telephone call, JOHNSON
falsely stated that the business had a physical office, when in truth, the address
provided was a United Parcel Service store location, and MADDOX confirmed
falsely that the business address provided by JOHNSON was their office address
and that the business had a respective lease agreement.

27. On or about March 24, 2021, Cross River Bank provided additional PPP loan
funds in the amount of $122,475, which was wired to the CMCU Account.

EIDL Application x8002

28. On or about April 10, 2020, MADDOX submitted and caused to be submitted an
application through SBA’s electronic portal in the name of Pick Up & Go Moving International,
Inc. (“EIDL Application x8002”).

29. EIDL Application x8002 falsely represented that the business had $1.8 million in
gross revenue for the 12 months prior to the date of the disaster and had 21 employees.

30. Onor about July 2, 2020, MADDOX electronically signed the Loan
Authorization and Agreement in connection with EIDL Application x8002 for the business. In
the loan agreement, MADDOX certified that all the representations in EIDL Application x8002
were true, correct and complete and were offered to induce SBA to make the loan.

31. Onor about July 2, 2020, SBA funded the loan by wiring approximately $149,900
to the CMCU Account.

5
Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR Document1 Filed 02/21/24 Page 5 of 9
COUNT ONE
(Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud and Wire Fraud)

32. | The Grand Jury realleges and incorporates by reference herein, all of the
allegations contained in paragraphs | through 31 of the Bill of Indictment, and further alleges

that:

33. From in or around 2018 through in or around 2023, in Mecklenburg County,
within the Western District of North Carolina, and elsewhere, the defendants,

(1) ANTOINE JOHNSON and
(2) KIMBERLY MADDOX

did knowingly combine, conspire, confederate, and agree with one another to commit offenses
against the United States, those being bank fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1344; and wire fraud in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.

Objects of the Conspiracy

34. Bank Fraud: It was a part and an object of the conspiracy that the named
Defendants, would and did execute and attempt to execute the scheme and artifice to obtain
monies owned by, or in the custody or control of, one or more Victim Financial Institutions, by
means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, in violation of
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344(2).

35. Wire Fraud: it was a part and an object of the conspiracy that the named
Defendants, with the intent to defraud, did knowingly and intentionally devise the above-
described scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property by means of
materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, and by concealment of
material facts, and for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice to defraud, did transmit
and cause to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate commerce any writing,
signal, picture, and sound, to wit, electronic loan applications, wire transfers, and other electronic
financial transactions in interstate commerce, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1343.

All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.

6
Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR Document1 Filed 02/21/24 Page 6 of 9
COUNT TWO
(False Statements to a Financial Institution)

36, | The Grand Jury realleges and incorporates by reference herein, all of the
allegations contained in paragraphs | through 27 of the Bill of Indictment, and further alleges
that:

37. | Onor about February 25, 2021, in Mecklenburg County, within the Western
District of North Carolina and elsewhere, the defendant,

(1) ANTOINE JOHNSON

did knowingly make and cause to be made a false statement with the intent to influence the
actions of Cross River Bank, a financial institution, the accounts of which are insured by the
National Credit Union Administration Share Insurance Fund, to wit, in PPP Loan Application
x7907, JOHNSON, among other things, falsely represented that the business had a physical
office space and a lease agreement.

All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014 and 2.

7
Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR Document1 Filed 02/21/24 Page 7 of 9
COUNT THREE
(False Statements to a Financial Institution)

38. | The Grand Jury realleges and incorporates by reference herein, all of the
allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 27 of the Bill of Indictment, and further alleges
that:

39. Onor about February 25, 2021, in Mecklenburg County, within the Western
District of North Carolina and elsewhere, the defendant,

(2) KIMBERLY MADDOX

did knowingly make and cause to be made a false statement with the intent to influence the
actions of Cross River Bank, a financial institution, the accounts of which are insured by the
National Credit Union Administration Share Insurance Fund, to wit, in PPP Loan Application
x7907, MADDOX falsely represented, among other things, that the business had a lease
agreement for a physical office space.

All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014 and 2.

8
Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR Document1 Filed 02/21/24 Page 8 of 9
NOTICE OF FORFEITURE AND FINDING OF PROBABLE CAUSE

Notice is hereby given of 18 U.S.C. § 982 and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c). Under Section
2461(c), criminal forfeiture is applicable to any offense for which forfeiture is authorized by any
other statute, including but not limited to 18 U.S.C. § 981, and all specified unlawful activities
listed or referenced in 18 U.S.C. § 1956(c)(7), which are incorporated as to proceeds by Section
981(a)(1)(C). The following property is subject to forfeiture in accordance with Section 982
and/or 2461(c):

a. All property which constitutes or is derived from proceeds of the violations set forth
in this Bill of Indictment; and

b. If, as set forth in 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), any property described in (a) and (b) cannot be
located upon the exercise of due diligence, has been transferred or sold to, or
deposited with, a third party, has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court, has
been substantially diminished in value, or has been commingled with other property
which cannot be divided without difficulty, all other property of the defendant’s to the
extent of the value of the property described in (a).

The Grand Jury finds probable cause to believe that the following property is subject to forfeiture
on one or more of the grounds stated above:

a. A forfeiture money judgment in the amount of at least $2 million, such amount
constituting the proceeds of the violations set forth in this Bill of Indictment.

A TRUE BILL:

FOREPERSON

DENA J. KING
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

ee. - (fle

CASSYE COLE
ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

9
Case 3:24-cr-00044-FDW-SCR Document1 Filed 02/21/24 Page 9 of 9


File and source

File
1.pdf
Size
555,948 bytes
SHA-256
dde9e807ee3de5a714fd30f9c74f410b333a38d256b5e5365da1bbd77792b9de
Our copy
1.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top