Order: Motion for Travel Expenses to and from Sentencing — United States v. Heinlein (Dkt. 27, W.D. Wash.)
Summary
An Order, Document 27, filed 02/08/24, in United States of America v. Jessica Heinlein, Case No. CR23-5300 BHS, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Tacoma. The Court takes up Defendant Jessica Heinlein's motion for travel expenses to and from sentencing on February 12, 2024, in Tacoma, Washington. It states that the U.S. Marshals Service can cover the costs only for the trip from South Carolina to Tacoma. The Court concludes that Heinlein has sufficient funds in her "restitution account" and DENIES the request for a hotel for two nights, food for two days, and a return flight to South Carolina. It is dated the 8th day of February, 2024, over the name of Benjamin H. Settle, United States District Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order: Motion for Travel Expenses to and from Sentencing — United States v. Heinlein (Dkt. 27, W.D. Wash.).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-3-23-cr-05300-dkt-27-w-d-wash-54f2e08fbb/
, SHA-256 d62146fb43ca9617ff2ec19f177176cdec06e472f2a22b94858cfaaf4801ef04.Full text
Case 3:23-cr-05300-BHS Document 27 Filed 02/08/24 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. CR23-5300 BHS
8
Plaintiff, ORDER
9 v.
10 JESSICA HEINLEIN,
11 Defendant.
12
13 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Jessica Heinlein’s motion for an
14 order providing travel expenses to and from her sentencing on February 12, 2024, in
15 Tacoma, Washington. Dkt. 16. The Court previously granted this motion in part,
16 specifically concerning Heinlein’s request for the United States Marshals Service to
17 cover the costs of her travel from South Carolina to Tacoma and back. Dkt. 17.
18 Subsequent to the Court’s order, the U.S. Marshals Service reached out to the
19 Court and clarified that it is able to cover the costs of travel only for the trip from South
20 Carolina to Tacoma for Heinlein’s sentencing.
21 The Court contacted Pretrial Services to inquire whether it had the ability to
22 provide additional financial assistance for Heinlein’s travel. Specifically, for the trip
ORDER - 1
Case 3:23-cr-05300-BHS Document 27 Filed 02/08/24 Page 2 of 2
1 home from Tacoma to South Carolina, and for lodging and subsistence while she stays in
2 Tacoma for sentencing. Pretrial Services responded that it is able to provide such
3 assistance only through its “Second Chance Act” funds. Dkt. 26. It asked Heinlein to fill
4 out additional financial disclosures in order to assess whether she qualified for the funds.
5 Heinlein obliged, and pre-trial services determined that she did not qualify for its Second
6 Chance Act funds. Dkt. 26.
7 The Court concludes that Heinlein has sufficient funds in her “restitution account”
8 to pay for her expenses of lodging and subsistence while in Tacoma as well as her return
9 trip home to South Carolina after sentencing.
10 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Court DENIES Heinlein’s request
11 for funds to cover a hotel for two nights, food for two days, and a return flight to South
12 Carolina. Dkt. 16. The U.S. Marshals Service will cover her travel expenses for the trip
13 from South Carolina to Tacoma for her sentencing, and Heinlein is responsible for
14 expenses during her stay in Tacoma as well as expenses for her trip home to South
15 Carolina.
16 Dated this 8th day of February, 2024.
17
18
19
A
BENJAMIN H. SETTLE
United States District Judge
20
21
22
ORDER - 2
File and source
- File
- 27.pdf
- Size
- 117,107 bytes
- SHA-256
- d62146fb43ca9617ff2ec19f177176cdec06e472f2a22b94858cfaaf4801ef04
- Our copy
- 27.pdf
- Original
- archive.org