Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty — U.S. v. Kinjal Patel, No. 3:23-cr-00252 (N.D. Tex.)

Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty — U.S. v. Kinjal Patel, No. 3:23-cr-00252 (N.D. Tex.)

Summary

A Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in United States of America vs. Kinjal Patel, Case No. 3:23-CR-252-K (02), N.D. Tex. Kinjal Patel, by consent, appeared before the magistrate judge under Fed. R. Crim.P. 11 and entered a plea of guilty to Count I of the 1-Count Superseding Information, filed on February 27, 2025. The magistrate judge states that the plea was knowledgeable and voluntary and supported by an independent basis in fact, and recommends that it be accepted and that Patel be adjudged guilty of Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud, in violation of 18 USC § 371[18 USC § 1344(a)(2)]. The form ends with a notice of fourteen (14) days to file written objections.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty — U.S. v. Kinjal Patel, No. 3:23-cr-00252 (N.D. Tex.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-3-23-cr-00252-dkt-250-n-d-tex-3598f8b3ff/, SHA-256 a37f479833afb99ad34656136e95b8086913b8a0032a5eab5632943faac5ece2.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT “iss SS ISTRIGE COURT
e

FOR THE RTHERN DI FT THHRN DISTRICTOM TEXAS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : APR 2 A 2005
VS. § CASE NO.: 3:23-CR-252-K (02)
§ — CLERK, U.S, DISTRICT ibn
y [a
KINJAL PATEL § ys

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

KINJAL PATEL, by consent, under authority of United States v. Dees, 125 F.3d 261 (5th Cir.
1997), has appeared before me pursuant to Fed. R. Crim.P. 11, and has entered a plea of guilty to Count I
of the 1-Count Superseding Information, filed on February 27, 2025, After cautioning and examining
Defendant Kinjal Patel, under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined
that the guilty plea was knowledgeable and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by an
independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. | therefore recommend
that the plea of guilty be accepted, and that Defendant Kinjal Patel, under oath concerning each of the
subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was, be adjudged guilty of Conspiracy to
Commit Bank Fraud, in violation of 18 USC § 371[18 USC § 1344(a)(2)], and have sentence imposed
accordingly. After being found guilty of the offense by the district judge.

Q The defendant is currently in custody and should be ordered to remain in custody.
SK The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1) unless the Court finds by clear

and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the
community if released.

P.4 The Government does not oppose release.
Se The defendant has been compliant with the current conditions of release.
Xf ] find by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to
any other person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or
(c),
Qo The Government opposes release.
Q The defendant has not been compliant with the conditions of release.
a If the Court accepts this recommendation, this matter should be set for hearing upon motion of the
Government.

o The defendant must be ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) unless (1)(a) the Court finds there
is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or (b) the Government has
recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, or (c) exceptional circumstances are clearly
shown under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained, and (2) the Court finds by clear and
convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the
community if released.

Signed April 24, 2024. by Pn

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
NOTICE
Failure to file written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days from the date

of its service shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking such Report and Recommendation before the assigned United
States District Judge. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B).


File and source

File
250.pdf
Size
69,049 bytes
SHA-256
a37f479833afb99ad34656136e95b8086913b8a0032a5eab5632943faac5ece2
Our copy
250.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top