Verdict Form — United States v. Ejembi Onah, No. 3:22-cr-00082 (N.D.N.Y.)

Summary

A Verdict Form dated October 10, 2023, at Utica, New York, labeled Court's Exhibit No. 1, in United States of America v. Ejembi Onah, 3:22-CR-82, Document 96, filed 10/10/23, in the Northern District of New York. Under the heading WIRE FRAUD, Counts One through Two, it asks whether defendant Ejembi Onah committed wire fraud as described in the indictment on or about July 1, 2020 and on or about July 20, 2020. Under MONETARY TRANSACTIONS IN CRIMINALLY DERIVED PROPERTY, Counts Three through Five, it asks about transactions on or about July 1, 2020 and July 21, 2020. Each question has a forfeiture money judgment follow-up, with printed amounts that include $72,000.00 for Count One and $72,083.32 for Count Two.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 3:22-cr-00082-DNH Document 96 Filed 10/10/23 Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
-v- 3:22-CR-82
EJEMBI ONAH,
Defendant.
VERDICT FORM

October 10, 2023 :
Utica, New York Court’s Exhibit No. 1
Case 3:22-cr-00082-DNH Document 96 Filed 10/10/23 Page 2 of 4

WIRE FRAUD
Counts One through Two

1. Do you find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant Ejembi
Onah committed wire fraud as described in the indictment on

or about July 1, 2020? aA

Not Guilty Guilty

1A. If defendant Ejembi Onah is guilty of Count One, do
you find by a preponderance of the evidence that he
must forfeit to the United States a forfeiture money
judgment in the amount of $72,000.00 representing
missing property obtained by the defendant that
constitutes or is derived from proceeds directly or
indirectly traceable to the offense of conviction?

Yes No

2. Do you find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant Ejembi
Onah committed wire fraud as described in the indictment on
or about July 20, 2020? 1

Not Guilty Guilty

2A. If defendant Ejembi Onah is guilty of Count Two, do
you find by a preponderance of the evidence that he
must forfeit to the United States a forfeiture money
judgment in the amount of $72,083.32 representing
missing property obtained by the defendant that
constitutes or is derived from proceeds directly or
indirectly traceable to the offense of conviction?

Yes No
Case 3:22-cr-00082-DNH Document 96 Filed 10/10/23 Page 3 of 4

MONETARY TRANSACTIONS IN CRIMINALLY DERIVED
PROPERTY
Counts Three through Five

3. Do you find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant Ejembi
Onah engaged in certain monetary transactions in criminally
derived property as described in the indictment on or about

July 1, 2020? ! 4d

Not Guilty Guilty

3A. If defendant Ejembi Onah is guilty of Count Three, do you
find by a preponderance of the evidence that he must forfeit to
the United States a forfeiture money judgment in the amount
of $10,926.00 representing missing property obtained by the
defendant that was involved in the commission of the offense

of conviction?

Yes No

4. Do you find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant Ejembi
Onah engaged in certain monetary transactions in criminally
derived property as described in the indictment on or about

July 21, 2020? ! (

Not Guilty Guilty

‘4A. If defendant Ejembi Onah is guilty of Count Four, do you
find by a preponderance of the evidence that he must forfeit to
the United States a forfeiture money judgment in the amount
of $11,000.00 representing missing property obtained by the
defendant that was involved in the commission of the offense

of conviction? 4

Yes No
Case 3:22-cr-00082-DNH Document 96 Filed 10/10/23 Page 4 of 4

5. Do you find beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant Ejembi
Onah engaged in certain monetary transactions in criminally
derived property as described in the indictment on or about

July 21, 2020? i

Not Guilty Guilty

5A. If defendant Ejembi Onah is guilty of Count Five, do you find
by a preponderance of the evidence that he must forfeit to the
United States a forfeiture money judgment in the amount of
$70,000.00 representing missing property obtained by the
defendant that was involved in the commission of the offense

of conviction?
Yes

Dated: October ik O , 2023 United States District Judge
Utica, New York.

No


File and source

File

96.pdf

Size

149,523 bytes

SHA-256

632fe8243b64dae7ccdf3e8310785ea072be446a96a7ac81270fe75a87b71769

Our copy

96.pdf

Original

storage.courtlistener.com