Order — United States v. Sarrah Denton Willhite (Eastern District of Tennessee, Document 28)

Summary

Order in the Eastern District of Tennessee in the case against Sarrah Denton Willhite. It states that the case is before the Court on a pro se motion by the defendant (Doc. 26) to dismiss the indictment, and that the defendant is represented by appointed counsel (Doc. 5). The Order cites the Local Rules provision that a party who has appeared by attorney may not thereafter appear or act on that party's own behalf in the action or proceeding. The Court denies the pro se motion for failure to comply with the Local Rules.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                   )
                                             )
              Plaintiff,                     )
                                             )
 v.                                          )      No.:   3:22-CR-69-TAV-DCP-1
                                             )
 SARRAH DENTON WILLHITE,                     )
                                             )
              Defendant.                     )


                                         ORDER

       This case is before the Court on a pro se motion by defendant [Doc. 26] to dismiss

 the indictment. However, defendant is represented by appointed counsel in this case [Doc.

 5]. This Court’s Local Rules provide that “[w]henever a party has appeared by attorney,

 that party may not thereafter appear or act in his or her own behalf in the action or

 proceeding.” E.D. Tenn. LR 83.4(c). Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES defendant’s

 pro se motion [Doc. 26] for failure to comply with the Local Rules.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.


                                   s/ Thomas A. Varlan
                                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE




Case 3:22-cr-00069-TAV-DCP Document 28 Filed 01/27/23 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 116


File and source

File

28.pdf

Size

73,417 bytes

SHA-256

35768ac56dec15d4c2432feda3318ba352e246c7d43967bbb99bb8a912bc7ce7

Our copy

28.pdf

Original

archive.org