Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Court filing — No. 3:22-cr-00009 (Dkt. 36)

Court filing — No. 3:22-cr-00009 (Dkt. 36)

Full text

                   IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA


 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                     Plaintiff,

        vs.                                    Case No. 3:22-cr-00009-SLG-KFR

 MICHAEL WAYNE HANZUK, II,

                     Defendant.



REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE UPON
                   A PLEA OF GUILTY
      Upon Defendant's request to enter a guilty plea pursuant to Rule 11 of the

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to Count One of the Information, Conspiracy to

Violate the Clean Air Act, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, this matter was referred to

the Magistrate Judge by the District Court. The Defendant, with the advice of

counsel, being fully advised of his right to proceed before a District Judge consented

to plead before a Magistrate Judge on the record and in writing, at Dkt. 30.

      On May 19, 2022, the Defendant, his counsel, and counsel for the United

States, in full compliance with Rule 11 and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure,

came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge, in open court and on

the record.




Final R&R re Plea of Guilty
United States v. Hanzuk II
3:22-cr-00009-SLG-KFR                                                          Page 1
      Case 3:22-cr-00009-SLG-KFR Document 36 Filed 05/20/22 Page 1 of 5
      In consideration of that hearing and the allocution made by the Defendant

under oath on the record and in the presence of counsel, and the remarks of the

Assistant United States Attorney,

      A. I make the following FINDINGS – that the Defendant understands:

          1. That any false statements made by the Defendant under oath may later

             be used against him in a prosecution for perjury;

          2. The right to persist in a plea of “not-guilty”;

          3. The consequences of a finding of guilty if he is not a United States

             citizen;

          4. The nature of the charges against him;

          5. The maximum possible sentence, including imprisonment, fine, and the

             effect of the supervised release term,

          6. Any applicable mandatory minimum penalty;

          7. The Court’s authority to order restitution;

          8. The Court’s obligation to impose a special assessment;

          9. Any applicable forfeiture;

          10. The right to a speedy and public trial by jury;

          11. The right to be represented by counsel – and if necessary to have the

             court appoint counsel– at trial and at every other stage of the

             proceedings;




Final R&R re Plea of Guilty
United States v. Hanzuk II
3:22-cr-00009-SLG-KFR                                                       Page 2
      Case 3:22-cr-00009-SLG-KFR Document 36 Filed 05/20/22 Page 2 of 5
          12. The right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, to be

             protected from compelled self-incrimination, to testify and present

             evidence, and to compel the attendance of witnesses;

          13. The Defendant’s waiver of trial rights if the Court accepts a guilty plea

             or nolo contendere;

          14. That Defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his

             right to appeal or collaterally attack his conviction and any sentence

             imposed if it is within the range permitted by the plea agreement; and

          15. That in determining a sentence, the court’s obligation to calculate the

             applicable sentencing guideline range and to consider that range,

             possible departures under the Sentencing Guidelines, and other

             sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. §3553(a).

      B. I further FIND that:

          1. The Defendant is competent to enter a plea;

          2. That the plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and

             voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or coercion;

          3. Any agreements or promises which induced the plea of guilty are set

             forth in the written plea agreement or on the record; and

          4. That there is a sufficient factual basis for the Defendant’s plea.

      C. I RECOMMEND that the District Court accept the Defendant’s plea of

guilty to Count One of the Information, Conspiracy to Violate the Clean Air Act, a

violation of 18 U.S.C. §371.


Final R&R re Plea of Guilty
United States v. Hanzuk II
3:22-cr-00009-SLG-KFR                                                             Page 3
      Case 3:22-cr-00009-SLG-KFR Document 36 Filed 05/20/22 Page 3 of 5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:

      D. A Presentence Report be prepared.

          1. Any objection(s) to the presentence report shall be filed no later than

             fourteen (14) days after receiving the presentence report pursuant to

             Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(f)(1);

          2. Any sentencing memorandum shall be filed no later than seven (7)

             business days prior to sentencing pursuant to D.AK. LCrR 32.1(d);

      The Sentencing hearing will be held before United States District Judge

Sharon L. Gleason on August 31, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. in Anchorage Courtroom 2. The

Court excludes time from May 19, 2022 until the time of sentencing pursuant to 18

U.S.C. §3161(h)(1)(G) on the ground that the District Judge will be considering the

proposed plea agreement.

             DATED this 20th day of May, 2022, at Anchorage, Alaska.

                                             s/ Scott A. Oravec
                                             SCOTT A. ORAVEC
                                             United States Magistrate Judge




Final R&R re Plea of Guilty
United States v. Hanzuk II
3:22-cr-00009-SLG-KFR                                                         Page 4
      Case 3:22-cr-00009-SLG-KFR Document 36 Filed 05/20/22 Page 4 of 5
                         NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT

      This Report and Recommendation is being issued as a Final Report and

Recommendation.      Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim P. 59(b)(3), any objections will be

considered by the District Court Judge who will accept, reject, or modify the

recommendation following de novo review. Any objections must be filed within seven

(7) days from the date of service of this Report and Recommendation. Fed. R. Crim.

P.59(b)(2) and D.Ak.L.M.R. 6(a) authorizes the Court to alter the standard objection

deadlines.

      Reports and Recommendations are not appealable orders. Any notice of appeal

pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1) should not be filed until entry of the District

Court’s judgment. See Hilliard v. Kincheloe, 796 F.2d 308 (9th Cir. 1986).




Final R&R re Plea of Guilty
United States v. Hanzuk II
3:22-cr-00009-SLG-KFR                                                        Page 5
      Case 3:22-cr-00009-SLG-KFR Document 36 Filed 05/20/22 Page 5 of 5


File and source

File
36.pdf
Size
113,757 bytes
SHA-256
06ff90e90aaece693c73d1222138c27808a589587c0666349a0c42d05b720648
Our copy
36.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top