Motion for Continuance — United States v. Douglas S. Ward (Western District of Missouri, Document 33)
Summary
Motion for Continuance in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Southern Division, Criminal Action No. 21-CR-05003, United States of America v. defendant Ward. Defendant Ward, through the attorney of record, requests a continuance of the jury trial setting, stating that the matter is scheduled for pretrial conference on April 06, 2021 and jury trial for the week of May 3rd, 2021. It states that defense counsel requires additional time for the discovery process and that the Government by AUSA Jessica Sarff does not oppose a continuance. The motion asks the Court to reset the matter to the August or September trial docket due to older cases that counsel has already set.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Motion for Continuance — United States v. Douglas S. Ward (Western District of Missouri, Document 33).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-3-21-cr-05003-dkt-33-w-d-mo-89c7425594/
, SHA-256 2d4e66005d4f25a9d675bb26c98cd89bddc8b83aa588e742def26bf2e11ba38b.Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI,
SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
vs. ) Criminal Action No.
) 21-CR-05003
)
DOUGLAS S. WARD )
)
Defendant. )
MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
COMES NOW Defendant Douglas S. Ward, by and through his attorney of record,
Stuart P. Huffman, and requests a continuance of the jury trial setting in the above-styled cause.
In support thereof, the Defendant submits the following sworn facts:
1. The above matter is scheduled for pretrial conference on April 06, 2021 and jury
trial for the week of May 3rd, 2021
2. Defense counsel requires additional time for the discovery process.
3. The Government by AUSA Jessica Sarff does not oppose a continuance.
4. That a continuance was discussed with Defendant Ward who understands the
need for additional time and that it is in his best interests.
5. This continuance is not sought for the purpose of dilatory delay, but is sought in
truth and fact so that Defendant may be afforded due process of law under the
Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
1
Case 3:21-cr-05003-MDH Document 33 Filed 04/02/21 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests this Court to remove this case from its
scheduled trial date and reset the matter to the August or September trial docket due to older
cases that Counsel has already set.
WHITEAKER & WILSON, P.C.
By /s/ Stuart P. Huffman__
Stuart P. Huffman
Missouri Bar No. 49633
Attorney for Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on April 2, 2021, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk
of the Court using the CM/ECF system which sent notification of such filing to the United States
Attorney and all other CM/ECF participants in this case.
By /s/ Stuart P. Huffman__
Stuart P. Huffman
Missouri Bar No. 49633
Attorney for Defendant
3315 E. Ridgeview St, Suite 4000
Post Office Box 3758
Springfield, MO 65808-3758
Telephone: (417) 882-7400
Facsimile: (417) 882-6101
2
Case 3:21-cr-05003-MDH Document 33 Filed 04/02/21 Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- 33.pdf
- Size
- 76,547 bytes
- SHA-256
- 2d4e66005d4f25a9d675bb26c98cd89bddc8b83aa588e742def26bf2e11ba38b
- Our copy
- 33.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.