Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Verdict Form — United States v. Denny Bhakta (S.D. Cal.)Search ⌕

Verdict Form — United States v. Denny Bhakta (S.D. Cal.)

Summary

The jury verdict form in United States of America v. Denny Bhakta, Case No. 21-CR-3352-JLS, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, filed October 31, 2024 as Document 140. For each count the jury writes NOT GUILTY or GUILTY against the offense charged in the Superseding Indictment. Count 1 is securities fraud, Count 2 money laundering, Counts 3 through 20 bank fraud and Counts 21 through 25 money laundering. The handwritten entries include Guilty for several counts. The four-page form is dated at San Diego, California.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Verdict Form — United States v. Denny Bhakta (S.D. Cal.).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-3-21-cr-03352-dkt-140-s-d-cal-e48edbc7c2/, SHA-256 51b23fa8936355d4ae568599f374e03bc48a79b1305c48e919598acb5f228d0b.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 21-CR-3352-JLS

Plaintiff,
Vv.
DENNY BHAKTA,
Defendant.

VERDICT FORM

We the jury in the above-titled cause find the Defendant Denny Bhakta:

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

Gus Hy

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

burly

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

COUNT 1

of the offense of securities fraud as charged in
Count | of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 2

of the offense of money laundering as charged in
Count 2 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 3

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 3 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 4

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 4 of the Superseding Indictment.
Guill

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

Guilty

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

Guilty

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY ‘OR GUILTY)

COUNTS

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 5 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 6

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 6 of the Superseding Indictment.

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 7 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 8

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 8 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 9

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 9 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 10

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 10 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 11

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 11 of the Superseding Indictment.
Case 3:21-cr-03352-JLS Document 140

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

Filed 10/31/24 PagelD.972

COUNT 12

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 12 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 13

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 13 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 14

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 14 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 15

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 15 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 16

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 16 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 17

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 17 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 18

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 18 of the Superseding Indictment.

Page 3 of 4
Case 3:21-cr-03352-JLS Document140- Filed 10/31/24 PagelD.973 Page4of4

(ourlty

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

_ Guilty

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

(NOT GUILTY OR GUILTY)

Date: \y~31- 24

San Diego, California

COUNT 19

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 19 of the Superseding Indictment. |

COUNT 20

of the offense of bank fraud as charged in
Count 20 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 21

of the offense of money laundering as charged in
Count 21 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 22

of the offense of money laundering as charged in
Count 22 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT-23

of the offense of money laundering as charged in
Count 23 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 24

of the offense of money laundering as charged in
Count 24 of the Superseding Indictment.

COUNT 25

of the offense of money laundering as charged in
Count 25 of the Superseding Indictment.


File and source

File
140-jury-verdict-form-denny-bhakta.pdf
Size
122,007 bytes
SHA-256
51b23fa8936355d4ae568599f374e03bc48a79b1305c48e919598acb5f228d0b
Our copy
140-jury-verdict-form-denny-bhakta.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top