Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Order — Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel. Integra REC LLC v. Countrywide Securities Corp. et al. (Document 124)Search ⌕

Order — Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel. Integra REC LLC v. Countrywide Securities Corp. et al. (Document 124)

Summary

An Order, Document 124, filed 07/02/15 in Case 3:14-cv-00706-MHL, Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel. Integra REC LLC v. Countrywide Securities Corp. and other securities firm defendants, Civil Action No. 3:14cv706, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division. Pursuant to the parties' agreement, the Court orders a stay of the action until November 30,2015 to allow settlement discussions before Magistrate Judge David J. Novak, subject to limits in the June 15,2015 Order (ECF No. 122). The order also states that Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. appeared specially in the parallel state court action to object to personal jurisdiction, and that its participation in the settlement discussions will not waive that objection.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel. Integra REC LLC v. Countrywide Securities Corp. et al. (Document 124).” Original at ecf.vaed.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/court-filing-no-3-14-cv-00706-dkt-124-e-d-va-d3b9ffbb27/, SHA-256 45e1e78fd2e01313d5cd3fd9130d1b47ce36943ce82e40d1ecbe13f60f06f6c3.

Full text

Case 3:14-cv-00706-MHL            Document 124        Filed 07/02/15      Page 1 of 2 PageID# 4364




                         IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
                                          Richmond Division

 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ec rel.
 INTEGRA REC LLC,

                  Plaintiff,

                                                                 Civil Action No. 3:14cv706
 V.



 COUNTRYWIDE SECURITIES CORP.;
 CREDIT SUISSE (USA) LLC (f/k/a
 CREDITSUISSE FIRST BOSTON LLC);
 GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.;
 RBS SECURITIES INC. (f^t/a
 GREENWICH CAPITAL MARKETS, INC.);
 and, UBS SECURITIES LLC,
                   Defendants.

                                                 ORDER


             Pursuant to the agreement ofthe PlaintiffCommonwealth ofVirginia e* rel. Integra
  REC LLC and Defendants Countrywide Securities Corporation; Credit Suisse Securities (USA)
  LLC; Goldman, Sachs &Co.; RBS Securities Inc.; and, UBS Securities LLC (collectively, the
  "Parties"), the Court ORDERS astay ofthis action until November 30,2015 in order to allow
  for settlement discussions before the Honorable David J. Novak, United States Magistrate Judge.
           This stay shall be subject to the limitations described on page 7ofthe June 15,2015
  Order entered by the Honorable David J. Novak. (See ECF No. 122.)
             In the parallel state court action, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. ("DBSI") appeared
      specially for the limited purpose ofobjecting to personal jurisdiction and moving to dismiss the
      Complaint. In reliance on the Commonwealth's representation that the Commonwealth would
      not argue that by participating in the ongoing settlement discussions in the instant action DBSI
      had waived its jurisdictional objection, DBSI accepted the Court's invitation to participate in the
Case 3:14-cv-00706-MHL         Document 124          Filed 07/02/15     Page 2 of 2 PageID# 4365




settlement discussions. The Commonwealth has renewed and expanded its representation to
 encompass DBSFs continued participation in the settlement discussions, including without
 limitation providing information to the Commonwealth and/or the Court and seeking information
 from the Commonwealth in compliance with this Order. Accordingly, the Court finds that
 DBSFs participation in the instant settlement discussions shall not be deemed to be engaging in
 conduct related "to adjudicating the merits ofthe case" within the contemplation ofVirginia
 Code §8.01-277.1, and that, accordingly, such participation will not waive or compromise in any
 respect DBSFs objection to personal jurisdiction.
         Let the Clerk send acopy of this Order to all counsel ofrecord and to the Honorable
 David J, Novak, United States Magistrate Judge.

         It is so ORDERED.

                                                                           fs!
                                                                      M. Haimah
                                                              United States District Judge
  Richmond, Virginia
  Date: I ' i '

File and source

File
124-first100-v2-rank-42.pdf
Size
105,195 bytes
SHA-256
45e1e78fd2e01313d5cd3fd9130d1b47ce36943ce82e40d1ecbe13f60f06f6c3
Our copy
124-first100-v2-rank-42.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top